Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Pfft if you can find one...

P.s I m looking for if anyone knows where one is! Contact me please :)

http://www.my105.com.au/classified.asp?id=...5&feature=1

I should really focus on my work, at work... :)

Hope what you are looking for...

Seems Glenney in the pulse evo has trouble selecting with the PPG Gearbox too...Can hear it in the vid a couple down from the V8 vs Rotor

Sort of, I wanted to see the Pan Speed and R Magic cars but I will keep an eye out on the site.

That RX7 v Supercar vid is pretty telling of what affect weight and no tyres does for the Supercar. You see the RX7 is able to go soooo much later on the brakes and carry so much more speed mid corner.

So who is going to be the first to throw the mortgage at an R35. Stroker kit with bigger turbos, PPG gearset. Completley gut the thing and swiss hole it with lexan windows, carbon, titatium and as little cage as you can get away with.

So who is going to be the first to throw the mortgage at an R35. Stroker kit with bigger turbos, PPG gearset. Completley gut the thing and swiss hole it with lexan windows, carbon, titatium and as little cage as you can get away with.

my thoughts exactly. and will they do it by next years superlap. and even if they do, will the new platform be enough of an advantage to overcome what little development time a 12 month build-tune&test schedule would allow?

That RX7 v Supercar vid is pretty telling of what affect weight and no tyres does for the Supercar. You see the RX7 is able to go soooo much later on the brakes and carry so much more speed mid corner.

So who is going to be the first to throw the mortgage at an R35. Stroker kit with bigger turbos, PPG gearset. Completley gut the thing and swiss hole it with lexan windows, carbon, titatium and as little cage as you can get away with.

As last reply to this site, I'll do a 35, but by no way on your recommendation - enjoy - see ya's next year

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...