Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Not sure if i posted in correct section, but my ODO seems to be reading incorrectly for the traveled KM's

I've tested it this week and so far half tank has gotten me 78KMs?

I don't think its my fuel efficiency as my car hardly has anything that would use that much petrol when driving normally

I was expecting at least 150 - 200 on half tank reading but its sitting on 82KM traveled at the moment

Any help would be appreciated

Cheers,

Will

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/296632-odo-doesnt-accumuate-kms-accurately/
Share on other sites

Odometer measures distances, not fuel economy.

Poor fuel economy is often the result of a failed engine temp sensor (ECU thinks the engine is still cold, and overfuels the mixtures).

Other possibility is a dirty air filter restricting airflow into the engine.

Odometer measures distances, not fuel economy.

Poor fuel economy is often the result of a failed engine temp sensor (ECU thinks the engine is still cold, and overfuels the mixtures).

Other possibility is a dirty air filter restricting airflow into the engine.

Yes i know it measures the distance but is it possible for it to read inaccurately?

I will be getting my car checked out this week, will be running it on my mates dyno to see if the ODO matches up with the dyno distance traveled

I'll get the engine temp sensor checked as well, other then that any other possibilities?

Yes i know it measures the distance but is it possible for it to read inaccurately?

I will be getting my car checked out this week, will be running it on my mates dyno to see if the ODO matches up with the dyno distance traveled

I'll get the engine temp sensor checked as well, other then that any other possibilities?

What I'm saying is that just because you have used more fuel than you expected to use doesn't mean the odometer is inaccurate. Presumably it has been accurate until now, so there is no reason why it would suddenly become inaccurate.

And it's "other THAN that".

What I'm saying is that just because you have used more fuel than you expected to use doesn't mean the odometer is inaccurate. Presumably it has been accurate until now, so there is no reason why it would suddenly become inaccurate.

And it's "other THAN that".

Fair enough, I'll see how it goes this Saturday

Hopefully its something as simple as the O2 sensor or Engine temp sensor

... but my ODO seems to be reading incorrectly for the traveled KM's

I've tested it this week and so far half tank has gotten me 78KMs?

I don't think its my fuel efficiency as my car hardly has anything that would use that much petrol when driving normally

I was expecting at least 150 - 200 on half tank reading but its sitting on 82KM traveled at the moment

Cheers,

Will

What blind_elk is saying is that there has to be something else other than just the odometer that's at fault.

If you're using up half a tank to get as far as 78Kms, something abominable is going on (according to your fuel gauge + tripmeter + calculations of where you've travelled).

2 faults = 2 different sets of symptoms in this case

What blind_elk is saying is that there has to be something else other than just the odometer that's at fault.

If you're using up half a tank to get as far as 78Kms, something abominable is going on (according to your fuel gauge + tripmeter + calculations of where you've travelled).

2 faults = 2 different sets of symptoms in this case

Yeah at the moment I'm still trying to see what else is going on, taking into account everyone's suggestions as well

I wont know until i have it checked out this Saturday, i just thought it was strange as my driving style hasn't changed and i feel i have traveled more then 80KM this week (Liverpool to Wollongong on Saturday which should have yielded at least 80kms on top of whatever i already had).

But yeah look will keep you guys posted on this.

Thanks for your help

  • 2 weeks later...

Update!

Got it checked out and it was the ODO reading incorrectly (half of what its meant to read)

I just got the SINE WAVE box re calibrated so all is reading correctly.

Thanks for your help guys

Update!

Got it checked out and it was the ODO reading incorrectly (half of what its meant to read)

I just got the SINE WAVE box re calibrated so all is reading correctly.

Thanks for your help guys

Good stuff Grimmjow. Bet you feel vindicated that it WAS the ODO :-)

haha im having the same problem with my stock one, and the speedo is half of what it should be :\ maybe i need to get it calibrated? Dunno getting a new cluster and gear sensor this weekend

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Some of them keep working fine. 9 out of 10 of them end up causing an absolute misery bleeding the system and get thrown on the workshop floor in a tantrum and never thought about again because they were never really needed and just added crap to the car that we could have done without. Same-same with HICAS, A-LSD, and various other stupidities that over eager 10x engineers thought we had to have.
    • Not required but appreciated. Super Coppermix Twin even the non-competition model feels like the pedal is noticeably heavier than stock which was pretty well judged IMO. I'll be swapping in the Nismo operating cylinder soon to see how that feels.  Personally I haven't felt anything that justifies replacing the damping loop, at least compared to more modern stuff where the clutch delay valve is actually quite noticeable.
    • He made that comment in my thread - In my case the vents ARE to lower engine heat, when the car is not moving, which is the only scenario I have heat problems with the aircon on, sitting in traffic, on 40C+ days. I can't imagine a scenario that this NC needs any at this point in time. I do not know if it will actually make my cooling when the car is MOVING worse, and I sincerely hope that won't be the case. If it does, well, um, f**k.
    • Nice, thanks. Thats why I was asking, there'd been a fair bit of discussion in the E90 world about vents and where it makes sense to put one (ie, over the filters is not great as that is inline or slightly behind the struts and in higher pressure area). I struggle with air flow and pressures. It sill weirds me out that a radiator in the boot can work. 
    • Neither really Vents, when located in the right place, will lower the engine bay "pressure", as air has a path to escape, thus lowering the engine bay pressure, thus.....improving the efficiency on the coolant stack (read: IC, condenser, radiator) This is why the Blits vented bonnet on my 33 worked so well, the vent was in the front 1/3 of the bonnet, which put it right after the radiator  If the vents are to far back toward the windscreen, which is a high pressure zone, it can actually force air into the engine bay, causing higher pressure and effectively loosing efficiency on the cooling stack, like the fab of raising the rear of the bonnet, which does allow heat to escape, but only when the car isn't moving  There's heaps of cool "fluid dynamics" info out there, but, I'll attach a video of a 'Merican joint that focuses on "Miatas" as I found it when looking into vents for mine, they explain it way better than me  
×
×
  • Create New...