Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i'm out, trying to get through to your brain is more difficult than finding a truthful A Current Affairs report.

You live with the dream that nothing can be done to the r35 to make it better. Go tell those tuning shops not to bother, because some guy called Jack said its perfect....

i'm out, you guys bicker amongst yourselves and i'll delete my posts tomorrow because they arnt related to the main thread anymore

Dude, no need to get emotional, we are having a constructive discussion.

Point out to me where I said the R35 is perfect.

All I'm saying is that you have an opinion which is not necessarily correct, didn't mean to hurt your feelings...

Friends??

  • Replies 304
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

gallery_462_50_7269.png

I vote for less jibber jabber and more 997 pics. Is Porsche thinking about using their PDK in the GT2? I hope not but if they can get the weight down to the point that it is similar to a normal manual...and they turf that silly reverse pattern/direction for shifting and use proper/more common paddles then it could squeeze a bit more performance from the thing....

well you have missed the point even though i cannot make it any clearer. Everything is up high on the R35, the lcd screen, dash, seat possition, bose sound system subs ect.... its not just the roof thats high, the thing is just too high. I know the numbers are in favour of the car as it is. But if the car had some simple design improvements isn't it obvious yet to you that those numbers would be much better?

Theres a reason why race cars are low, theres a reason why 4wd's don't corner well, the r35 doesn't have the heaviest roof, but unless it weighs nothing then the position of the car can be improved? Nissan did the whole car right in regards to making it stick as well as a car of its height can do, but all i'm simply saying is if the thing was much lower there would be an even more amazing car.

Yes we know those pesky japanese are so dumb when it comes to car design.

Why is the GT-R a well designed car?

Centre of mass height/wheelbase equal to the best out there. Note the Porsche is not even close:

http://www.nagtroc.org/w/images/2/22/Press...-mech-1a_07.jpg

http://www.nagtroc.org/w/images/5/51/Press...-mech-1a_05.jpg

Downforce as a function of Cd better than anything else out there.

http://www.nagtroc.org/w/images/b/b0/Press...-mech-1a_12.jpg

And finally scroll down to the dashboard picture and see that the instrument layout was intentionally laid out as it was.

http://www.nagtroc.org/wiki/Nissan_GT-R_Press_Kit_-_Package

While you're there take a look at the weight distribution graphic. Why have a mid engine and lose the back seat if you can achieve the optimum weight distribution from alternative means?

Your "qualitative" assessment of the engineering principles the car was designed around is truly laughable. And I just love your exaggerations, comparing it to corollas and suzukis..... Yes Nissan could have made it lower. But everything is comprimise and lets face it, if you can achieve your design objectives without making it as awkward as an Exige to climb in and out of then more power to you! In my humble opinion Nissan has minimised the comprimise in manufacturing a supercar. Since when is being low an end in itself? Show me another supercar that can fit drivers from 144cm-190cmin height and has 4 seats. You really miss the point of this car. All that being excessively low does is result in a car that can't get up my driveway and scrapes on every spoon drain. Gets tedious after a while.

Finally sorry to burst your italo-centric bubble. But your beloved Ferrari's will no longer be available in a manual version. The 458 is only going to be available in flappy paddle. Apparently less than 5% of customers wanted it in manual. Maybe that says more about the drivers of the Fazzas than the manufacturer but based on your perspective that statistic would be casting serious aspersions on the driving ability of the average Ferrari owner.

And please will people please stop attributing the Nissan's supernatural performance on electronics and gizmos!! IT IS FASTER AROUND A TRACK WITH VDC OFF as many guys on here who track them will attest to. It's just like the F430/911T/GT2 is and every other german/italian supercar out there. You dont think germans understand electronics? Just because it has a playstation dashboard people seem to think that it has some breakthrough technology built in to it to make it go faster....

They did a GOOD job???? FFS, considering they made a car that goes faster than any of your hero cars for a fraction of the cost and also way more practical, (read not as low and uncomfortable) they did a freakin fantastic job!

Edited by fungoolie
lol i'm back for a min, then im definately going to bed this time.

My opinions not necessarily wrong *still shakes head you can't grasp it*

i'm only stopping because there will be no agreement on this topic, and we have hijacked the GT2 thread and i dont think mods will be very happy.

So now i'm off, people can read both sides for now, but tomorrow i'm going to take my posts off that arnt relevant to the GT2 thread discussion.

and relax we can still be friends, afterall its only the internet, nothing on here is accurate.

can we agree that Holdens are a waste of materials????

Yep, don't mess with the mods, especially that R31Nismoid, he's not afraid to use his ban stick!!!

Must say that GT2 is special, and for the owner to modify it aswell??? The standard power is not enough????

Kudos to the OP, one damn fine car... :)

fungoolie - very accurate information, you can't argue with physics and enginnering!!! Very imformative, thanks for sharing...

Roy - took me a good ten minutes to recover from that one!!!!

Oh and sorry to MGS996TT for taking it off topic...

Will this car see the track at all??

Can half of you guys shut the f**k up, my god. This thread is about his GT2, his thoughts on it and the modifications he is doing to it. I am really enjoying this thread so can we please lay off a bit. I would hate for the OP to stop posting because of some of the comments being thrown around.

Sorry will not see the track, only the occasional weekend drive.

Nothing wrong with that!!!!

Can only imagine what this thing would be like at full noise in the higher gears.

Any suspension mods on the cards???

Any suspension mods on the cards???

No suspension mods in the works at the moment on the GT2. But have some new Hybrid Turbo’s in manufacture for the 996TT. UMW in Seattle is finishing them up.

After the Akrapovic system is installed on the GT2. Next item on the GT2 list is an uprated pressure plate & clutch…..then possibly Secan intercoolers.

No suspension mods in the works at the moment on the GT2. But have some new Hybrid Turbo’s in manufacture for the 996TT. UMW in Seattle is finishing them up.

After the Akrapovic system is installed on the GT2. Next item on the GT2 list is an uprated pressure plate & clutch…..then possibly Secan intercoolers.

Nice. Have you had the GT2 on a dyno? Would be interesting to see what gains your getting with the new mods.

Doesnt the GT2 have the uber magnetic suspension etc? If its anything like some of the other systems i have seen and read about then aftermarket suspension will just make it handle worse????????

Yep you are 100% correct. OEM system works great. Most of the GT2 guys are not going aftermarket.

Dude, no need to get emotional, we are having a constructive discussion.

Point out to me where I said the R35 is perfect.

All I'm saying is that you have an opinion which is not necessarily correct, didn't mean to hurt your feelings...

Friends??

i think the statement below is what he was referring to

It's ok, Nissan have thought of everything when designing the R35.
Yes we know those pesky japanese are so dumb when it comes to car design.

While you're there take a look at the weight distribution graphic. Why have a mid engine and lose the back seat if you can achieve the optimum weight distribution from alternative means?

Your "qualitative" assessment of the engineering principles the car was designed around is truly laughable. And I just love your exaggerations, comparing it to corollas and suzukis..... Yes Nissan could have made it lower. But everything is comprimise and lets face it, if you can achieve your design objectives without making it as awkward as an Exige to climb in and out of then more power to you! In my humble opinion Nissan has minimised the comprimise in manufacturing a supercar. Since when is being low an end in itself? Show me another supercar that can fit drivers from 144cm-190cmin height and has 4 seats. You really miss the point of this car. All that being excessively low does is result in a car that can't get up my driveway and scrapes on every spoon drain. Gets tedious after a while.

They did a GOOD job???? FFS, considering they made a car that goes faster than any of your hero cars for a fraction of the cost and also way more practical, (read not as low and uncomfortable) they did a freakin fantastic job!

what you've just described there is not a supercar... merely a really fast car really well designed for the masses, speed, power and handling have nothing to do with the overall scheme of things... holden could build a commodore to go fast round a track faster than a ferrari or porsche, doesnt make it a supercar though..

supercars are all about the quirks and perks and sheer ridiculousness of the whole ordeal... thats why they are supercars... they are impractical, obnoxious, unbearable and unique....

with all your links, youve just showed that the r35 gtr requires explanation of what it is and what it does, it needs to show what its capable of to earn respect, it may be quicker on paper and around the ring but a real supercar can command respect without even moving.

heck, an american made tank lapped the ring quicker then the gtr

nissan have made a real supercar before... this is not one of them and nothing like them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...