Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Linton (or anybody else),

do you happen to know what tyres/breaks do 997 GT2s run?

big sticky ones :P

some have come with Pirelli P-Zeros and some have come with Michelin PS Cups. noone really knows why or which is coming with which...

the brakes are ceramic/carbon discs with 6 piston fronts and 4 pistons rears

  • Replies 304
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Rivarly was very alive and very bitter at Mallala today.

Many Porsche owners drove and praised the R32 GTR at Nissan track days in '91 but I doubt that the majority of them even remotely considered being seen in one and not much has changed with the R35 GTR

Do you reckon that is true? To some some extent you'd have to say yes....but I think the R35 is a lot more 'exotic' in appearance (more 2 door coupe than 2 door saloon) and much more upmarket inside than previous generations Globally I think the GT-R has found more than a few homes which includes or even REPLACED a Porsche. You certainly need Porsche money to buy one and I at least know of one customer in Oz who cancelled his 911 order to make way for the GT-R...

Do you reckon that is true? To some some extent you'd have to say yes....but I think the R35 is a lot more 'exotic' in appearance (more 2 door coupe than 2 door saloon) and much more upmarket inside than previous generations Globally I think the GT-R has found more than a few homes which includes or even REPLACED a Porsche. You certainly need Porsche money to buy one and I at least know of one customer in Oz who cancelled his 911 order to make way for the GT-R...

thats what i said... just in a different way... the styling is that of a z platform... had they released it has a top spec performance version of a 350z... there would be no dramas... my drama is that they call it a skyline and put the GTR badge on it... the skyline was always boxy, never swoopy or streamlined.

exotic over the old skylines... yes... exotic against an exotic??

3203412711_deac89892f.jpg

gt2_3_1600x12001.jpg

naaah... porsche ftw!

big sticky ones :P

some have come with Pirelli P-Zeros and some have come with Michelin PS Cups. noone really knows why or which is coming with which...

the brakes are ceramic/carbon discs with 6 piston fronts and 4 pistons rears

I wander what percentage of road cars (even if you consider the really, really fast road cars) come with semi-slick tyres (or carbon ceramic brakes)?

thats what i said... just in a different way... the styling is that of a z platform... had they released it has a top spec performance version of a 350z... there would be no dramas... my drama is that they call it a skyline and put the GTR badge on it... the skyline was always boxy, never swoopy or streamlined.

exotic over the old skylines... yes... exotic against an exotic??

3203412711_deac89892f.jpg

gt2_3_1600x12001.jpg

naaah... porsche ftw!

they didnt call it a skyline...

Do you reckon that is true? To some some extent you'd have to say yes....but I think the R35 is a lot more 'exotic' in appearance (more 2 door coupe than 2 door saloon) and much more upmarket inside than previous generations Globally I think the GT-R has found more than a few homes which includes or even REPLACED a Porsche. You certainly need Porsche money to buy one and I at least know of one customer in Oz who cancelled his 911 order to make way for the GT-R...

Totally agree. Have had my R35 at Mallalla when the Porsche guys are there as I'm also member of their club and although there's rivalry as there is even between themselves it's definitely not bitter. They have a lot of respect for the Nissan and its capabilities especially noting its price compared with their cars. Lots of disbelieving shaking of heads when you tell them how "cheap" it is. Usually they're poking around underneath it looking for slicks! I know of a few PCSA members who have purchased R35s either in place of or in addition to their Porsches even though they don't advertise the fact openly in the club :D . It just comes down to brand loyalty. If you've owned and loved Porsches all your life just as if you are a Holden or Ford man you aren't easily going to jump ship just because your competition comes out with something better in the short term. You will grudgingly accept it and just hang out for the next "greatest thing" to appear from your stable to show the new upstart up. Some who have the means to buy the latest and greatest will just add the new wonder to their garage on top of all their other loves....

Edited by fungoolie
thats what i said... just in a different way... the styling is that of a z platform... had they released it has a top spec performance version of a 350z... there would be no dramas... my drama is that they call it a skyline and put the GTR badge on it... the skyline was always boxy, never swoopy or streamlined.

exotic over the old skylines... yes... exotic against an exotic??

3203412711_deac89892f.jpg

gt2_3_1600x12001.jpg

naaah... porsche ftw!

Yeah right, compare a happy snap of a GT-R at a motor show taken from above to a full on studio shot of the Porker with fancy lighting and wide angle lens taken by a midget!! Agreed theres beauty in function and thats why Porsches are so appealing to people who truly understand cars. However their real beauty lies beneath their skin. The raised emotion that their mechanical perfection causes in people tends to taint their view of what the cars actually look like. Honestly if another car maker such as Audi rocked up with something styled like the current 911 when they released the R8 they would have been laughed out of said motor show. Porsches styling is only truly loved by their enthusiasts. To all others they look stuff all different than what they did 20-30 years ago, especially with the "retro" look of the 997. They tried to change it with the 996 and the diehard enthusiasts cried foul. Ferraris, Astons and Maseratis etc are a completely different league to the German marque when it comes to styling revolution. Thank god for the ritual iconoclasts that exist in these other companies, (including Nissan). Imagine the time warp we'd be stuck in...

I go cruising with my brother in his 997 911T and honest to god, the GT-R makes the Porsche fade into the background when they are parked or driving together. And I'm not talking about some subjective opinion from my biased and opinionated viewpoint :D . I'm talking about the car that gets the blowflies buzzing around it with camera phones in hand and windows winding down while the 911 whumps on in relative anonymity. We were at a random breath testing station with him stopped in front of me and 3 coppers including the one who tested him made a beeline for me as soon as he'd finished blowing and kept me there for another 5 minutes just poring over the Jap car. I don't know if its simply the physical presence of the GT-R being so much bigger than the 911 or it's relative newness/rarity/novelty but it definitely draws all the attention. What I generally hear from the average punter is that the 911 no matter how new is "just another Porsche". And forget expecting a non Porsche enthusiast to be able to distinguish the different variants of the 911. They sometimes cant even tell a Cayman from a 911 and these guys are into cars, just not really heavily into exotica. I'd be slightly peeved if my car was being mistaken for a 1990 R32 GTS because the average person couldn't distinguish it from the old one simply because Nissan for whatever dogmatic reasons couldn't be bothered coming up with something significantly and two decades fresher.

What I truly love is that the typical non-car person hasnt got even the foggiest clue what the GT-R is! It definitely catches their eye though. They just know its something special....

Edited by fungoolie
Now this is exotic!

Herbie.jpg

Its all good fun, no one is losing an eye, even MGS would be having a good laugh at this thread :banana:

hahaha.... if Mr T went racing... thats what he'd drive

Totally agree. Have had my R35 at Mallalla when the Porsche guys are there as I'm also member of their club and although there's rivalry as there is even between themselves it's definitely not bitter. They have a lot of respect for the Nissan and its capabilities especially noting its price compared with their cars. Lots of disbelieving shaking of heads when you tell them how "cheap" it is. Usually they're poking around underneath it looking for slicks! I know of a few PCSA members who have purchased R35s either in place of or in addition to their Porsches even though they don't advertise the fact openly in the club :D . It just comes down to brand loyalty. If you've owned and loved Porsches all your life just as if you are a Holden or Ford man you aren't easily going to jump ship just because your competition comes out with something better in the short term. You will grudgingly accept it and just hang out for the next "greatest thing" to appear from your stable to show the new upstart up. Some who have the means to buy the latest and greatest will just add the new wonder to their garage on top of all their other loves....

there should be no bitterness... we are all car guys and everyone loves their car for their own reasons, if you dont, then its time to jump ship. ive tried all different cars, and the most memorable have been my skylines, mainly my r33 gtst.. what i would give to go back in time and re-live that period over again.

Yeah right, compare a happy snap of a GT-R at a motor show taken from above to a full on studio shot of the Porker with fancy lighting and wide angle lens taken by a midget!! Agreed theres beauty in function and thats why Porsches are so appealing to people who truly understand cars. However their real beauty lies beneath their skin. The raised emotion that their mechanical perfection causes in people tends to taint their view of what the cars actually look like. Honestly if another car maker such as Audi rocked up with something styled like the current 911 when they released the R8 they would have been laughed out of said motor show. Porsches styling is only truly loved by their enthusiasts. To all others they look stuff all different than what they did 20-30 years ago, especially with the "retro" look of the 997. They tried to change it with the 996 and the diehard enthusiasts cried foul. Ferraris, Astons and Maseratis etc are a completely different league to the German marque when it comes to styling revolution. Thank god for the ritual iconoclasts that exist in these other companies, (including Nissan). Imagine the time warp we'd be stuck in...

I don't know if its simply the physical presence of the GT-R being so much bigger than the 911 or it's relative newness/rarity/novelty but it definitely draws all the attention. What I generally hear from the average punter is that the 911 no matter how new is "just another Porsche". And forget expecting a non Porsche enthusiast to be able to distinguish the different variants of the 911. They sometimes cant even tell a Cayman from a 911 and these guys are into cars, just not really heavily into exotica. I'd be slightly peeved if my car was being mistaken for a 1990 R32 GTS because the average person couldn't distinguish it from the old one simply because Nissan for whatever dogmatic reasons couldn't be bothered coming up with something significantly and two decades fresher.

but the offset and design of the factory wheels.... ohhh the horror!!!... happy snap or full on photoshoot... the wheels and the stance because of the wheels on the r35 is truly horrid.. look how much gap is between the wheel and the guard... and then compare that to the porsche..

the r34 is much fresher than an r32.. nissan did a good job at refreshing the models for each series... there is no way you could be mistaken for any other model.

ducati did the same thing with the release of the 999... ducati fans hated the vertical light setup and it is viewed as a lesser ducati because of it... on the next model, the 1098, they went back to the side by side lights and it they were snapped up quicksmart and are praised throughout the world.

looking at the evolution of all car brands.. they all stick to their signature shape... porsche, lamborghini, mercs, ferraris, beamers, wrx's and evo's etc, heck, even holden .. they all find a refreshing spin on the next gen models but still keep it with the original shape making it instantly recognisable to even the faintest of people into cars.

audi, and the release of the r8 still doesnt strike me as an audi... it doesnt have the boxy bull nose shape i imagine when i hear the word audi.. an awesome car maybe, but not what i would consider their poster car... the rs6 is much better for that... it instantly springs to mind as an audi.

they didnt call it a skyline...

its an r35... which follows on from the r34.. they didnt call it a v35 or 350z-r or something like that... or start a new family chain.. therefore i see it as a predecessor to the R34 GTR.. i feel that the R34 Mspec Nur should have been the end of the skyline generation and a new family be created with the r35, never comparing the new r35 to the original skylines.

the m spec nur could have been a legend... the last ever skyline gtr... instead.. its now just a previous model, to be outdone by the next one, and the next one after that.

google r35 skyline and sure enough, you'll get lots popping up.. the gen pop knows it as a skyline.. thats all that matters.

its an r35... which follows on from the r34.. they didnt call it a v35 or 350z-r or something like that... or start a new family chain.. therefore i see it as a predecessor to the R34 GTR.. i feel that the R34 Mspec Nur should have been the end of the skyline generation and a new family be created with the r35, never comparing the new r35 to the original skylines.

the m spec nur could have been a legend... the last ever skyline gtr... instead.. its now just a previous model, to be outdone by the next one, and the next one after that.

google r35 skyline and sure enough, you'll get lots popping up.. the gen pop knows it as a skyline.. thats all that matters.

the R34 is the last skyline GTR. The R35 is just a Nissan GTR. it's very deliberately marketed without the skyline name.

its an r35... which follows on from the r34.. they didnt call it a v35 or 350z-r or something like that... or start a new family chain.. therefore i see it as a predecessor to the R34 GTR...

Predecessor means to come before. The predecessor to the R34 was the R33. The R35 GTR is the successor of the R34.

I feel that the R34 Mspec Nur should have been the end of the skyline generation and a new family be created with the r35, never comparing the new r35 to the original skylines.

the m spec nur could have been a legend... the last ever skyline gtr... instead.. its now just a previous model, to be outdone by the next one, and the next one after that.

That would have been the Z-Tune. Made from 2003 onwards.

google r35 skyline and sure enough, you'll get lots popping up.. the gen pop knows it as a skyline.. thats all that matters.

And as in many things in life, the general population would be wrong.

Predecessor means to come before. The predecessor to the R34 was the R33. The R35 GTR is the successor of the R34.

That would have been the Z-Tune. Made from 2003 onwards.

And as in many things in life, the general population would be wrong.

hahaha oops... successor is what i meant.. thank you.

z tune was fettled with and released by nismo, so to me its not the same..

general population most definatly wrong... all i mean is that they have dubbed it has a new skyline gtr, whether it is or isnt named a skyline by nissan.

google r35 skyline and sure enough, you'll get lots popping up.. the gen pop knows it as a skyline.. thats all that matters.

Actually google images skyline without the R35 and you get surprisingly few R35s popping up!!! Id say its about 1 in 15. You get the concepts appearing which were released before the name was confirmed as just GT-R. Maybe the general population is surprising me with their knowledge here :(

If the car has four afterburner lights on the tail, it's probably a Skyline or a Corvette. And the R35 isn't pretty enough to be a Corvette so it's most probably a Skyline. It doesn't matter what the manufacturer calls it in their marketing campaigns, the public consensus is what it is. If a car is a piece of shit for example, the market will call it that irrespective of what the manufacturer has to say about it...and the name will ring true.

If Nissan wanted true liberation from the Skyline name they would have ditched the Rxx prefix in favour of a new prefix let alone continue the numbers starting from 35. It didn't need to be called a Skyline because everyone knew it was the new Skyline and given the only level of trim available is the GTR, calling it a Nissan Skyline R35 GTR is an unnecessarily hierarchical/long name to market. What they went for is a balance between giving the car its rise from sports coupe into supercar territory, stealing sales from the Euro manufacturers, all the whilst retaining product interest from the Skyline fanbase (ex R34 owners etc) by retaining the Skyline inference of an "Rxx" prefix. Referring to it as simply the R35 GTR throughout marketing campaigns - I will take a guess at it having alot to do with fellow market buddy names being short and nounless themselves i.e. 911 GT2, R8, M3, F430.

And as in many things in life, the general population would be wrong.

Majority rules man! In a marketing situation like the branding of a vehicle name, telling the majority of a population that they're wrong - is 1980's style marketing suicide! Nissan did a good job of telling everyone that the Pulsar is now called the Tida :(

Actually google images skyline without the R35 and you get surprisingly few R35s popping up!!! Id say its about 1 in 15. You get the concepts appearing which were released before the name was confirmed as just GT-R. Maybe the general population is surprising me with their knowledge here :(

given that there are 5 models in the 80's and 90s... each with atleast 3 trim levels... getting an r35 pic when you type in skyline is, like you say, 1 in 15 chance... but type in r35 skyline and there should be no images found, as its not called a skyline, but alas... there are many many images with the full r35 skyline in the image title..

the fact that it is on this very forum shows that its considered a skyline.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks, I removed the fuse and the relay from the car and made my own circuit with them to test them with a test bulb.  I will look for the wiring diagram and go from there.
    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
×
×
  • Create New...