Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Agreed - very cool - have been meaning to try it sometime but haven't yet.

There are two ways to do it - the proper way (as gadl above does)

and the cheating way where you take one pic and do it in PS in 3 steps

(obviously not as good!)

Here for example is one I made the cheating way (pretty crap)

before

2009_02_05%20Brisbane%20CBD.jpg

after

2009_02_05%20Brisbane%20CBD%20Land.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/297679-wee-planets/#findComment-4954920
Share on other sites

1. Convert the photo into a square image

Use the Photo|Image Size menu item to change the image size into a large square. Uncheck ‘Constrain Proporties’ and set the “height” value to the same value as your “width” value.

2. Turn image upside down

Rotate by 180°

3. Apply the polar effect

“Filter|Distort|Polar Coordinates” filter - choose the “Rectangular to Polar” setting

When selecting a photo to start with you should keep the following things in mind:

  • Select a panorama photo or a cropped landscape photo (aspect ratio at least 2:1, which means the width should be at least two times the height).
  • The bottom area (bottom 25% or so) of the photo in most cases should have only very little detail (e.g. sand, asphalt, water). This area will later be in the middle of the picture and will also be distorted the most.
  • The upper area (upper 25%) should also have only little detail, most preferably just one color (e.g. blue sky, night sky etc.).
  • The left and the right border of the photo should neatly fit into each other (which is always the case for a stitched 360° panorama).
  • The horizon must be exactly horizontal, the left and right end of the photo will be joined together and if they are on different heights your planet will have a big crack in the surface (again this is no issue for 360° panoramas).
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/297679-wee-planets/#findComment-4955114
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I don't think that's what you're seeing. Something else doing that. The only time I've seen it get so retarded is when it's trying to control idle (in which case we're not talking about mapped timing tagets anyway) and when there is an extreme coolant temperature sensor fault. The RB26 ECU is essentially the same as the 20 ECU and I knew that ging inside out. There is no facility for it to retard that heavily on cold start. The OEMs never used to do it back then. I mean, shit, the catalyst is abotu 3 miles down the exhaust anyway. Early light-off was just a twinkle in some EPA arsehole's eye back then, not a regular engine control strategy.
    • I must preface my comments with a general expression of ignorance. I have no specific knowledge of these NA automtaic things. I can only assume that the "steering wheel button" is for enabling the tiptronic controls. Wierd that it would even need/want a button for that... But anyway.... Was the car previously tiptronic? Did you put a new cluster in as part of all this?
    • Regardless, it doesn't seem wise especially on RBs to actually chase MBT. Timing scatter is the big one on stock CAS, even if that's fixed overshoot is worse than undershoot. 
    • It's all about reducing the overall output. Reduce the source of it, you have wayyyy less to deal with in every other step and trick you play with. It's why something like a modern vehicle, so VW, Audi etc, there's thousands of tables for the ECU to calculate what it should be doing with the engine.   Why would you NOT reduce emissions the most effective way possible, when it has very minimal tradeoff, AND manufacturers are always struggling to meet the current standards.
    • Ran into this bloke trying to give Oscar some advice pre-race today.
×
×
  • Create New...