Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just realised they ran the bimmer in 3rd. Why not 4th? Its a 5 speed and has tiptronic so it would hold gears....

Because auto cars have a 1:1 ratio in 3rd gear.. As opposed to manual cars in 4th.

  • Replies 224
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

5-speed automatic ZF 5 HP 24 EH.

Ratios ( r : 1):

Ratio : 1

Top Speed @ 6,000 RPM

1st 3.57 39 MPH

2nd 2.20 63 MPH

3rd 1.51 92 MPH

4th 1.00 139 MPH

5th 0.83 155 MPH @ 5,500 RPM*

The manual is a 6 speed, so 5th is required for 1:1.

Edited by Ten Four
Dyno is about right with 500+rwhp in a 10sec car.

Sounds like the guys at Autoworx did a good job.

So we come to the conclusion Hypers n Advans dynos are out 150+ hp :( , what MPH should we be running if the 500 hp is right ???

134/137MPH. Jeffs 480rwhp 10.4 was at 136mph. Most 10sec V8s I do are from 450 to 500rwhp running GTR weight.

Really big HP Turbo cars are often slower because you need large Turbos etc giving way to much Lag needing dedicated Gearbox's etc.

Your GTR running 10s and also working well on a race track would be a very smart 500rwhp (Board power curve) with 2 people in the car.

Huge topend power does not make for a fast car, Fat Power / Torque curves do.

5-speed automatic ZF 5 HP 24 EH.

Ratios ( r : 1):

Ratio : 1

Top Speed @ 6,000 RPM

1st 3.57 39 MPH

2nd 2.20 63 MPH

3rd 1.51 92 MPH

4th 1.00 139 MPH

5th 0.83 155 MPH @ 5,500 RPM*

The manual is a 6 speed, so 5th is required for 1:1.

Well there you go, as you can see I didn't research my repsonse in terms of your car :(

5-speed automatic ZF 5 HP 24 EH.

Ratios ( r : 1):

Ratio : 1

Top Speed @ 6,000 RPM

1st 3.57 39 MPH

2nd 2.20 63 MPH

3rd 1.51 92 MPH

4th 1.00 139 MPH

5th 0.83 155 MPH @ 5,500 RPM*

The manual is a 6 speed, so 5th is required for 1:1.

I chose 3rd because I wanted a roller speed between 120 and 180km/hr, in accordance with standard shoot-out proceedure. There's more to it than gearbox ratio - it's overall final drive that matters.

The GTR of the Bart only made 518hp because it was blowing the tyres off. Big deal. I ran the car in 4WD first up and it made good numbers at all 4. The dyno wasnt down. The car wasnt down. 540 or whatever it made at all corners is damn respectable, and backs up the time slips. The low figure in RWD was an issue of coupling one to the other. Do we have any other AWD dyno figures to compare it to?

They probably thought it had 1:1 in 3rd, I doubt they dyno many Beemers.

Levi, fantastic pics mate! I'll have to have a chat with you next time, grab a few tips off you! Can I grab a higher resolution picture of my car?

No problem, always happy to talk cameras.

Bigger Picture

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi soviet_merlin, We appreciate your concern regarding this possibly being some sort of PR/Political hype, I assure you that is not the case, I wish we could claim something like that, but in this case, we merely reached out for comment on the basis of the outrage we too felt, as those heavily in the automotive industry. Ps. the original source in the social media post is CarExpert not CarExplore.    Best, CE.
    • Made a bit of a discovery, but while I was cruising, I randomly decided to test to see if it worked and it showed up on my IC7. The entire time I tested it before, I never thought to turn the ignition on. I only tested it with head lights turned on but with the ignition off. Huge oversight on my end. I’m a dummy. I know. 
    • G'day all, I have drilled and tapped the hole for the relocation of the timing belt tensioner. That was straight forward. I'm unsure if I need to also put another hole for the smaller stud that the spring behind the tensioner catches on (this is how it seems to work in its original spot). Or do you not use the spring behind it and just torque it down? Thanks in advance, I did a search but couldn't find anything related and it doesn't mention it in the rb30det sau guide.
    • Hi All,  just thought I would provide an update as I know smooth (Matt) was on this forum from 2003.    my brother Matthew passed away end of may 2024 at the age of 41 from liver failure. I am not sure how many of his original team krazy friends are still on here or active but thought it reasonable to let the forum know.    if you have any photos or pictures it would be great if you could share them.    it took me a while to work out he was active on here.    thanks so much 
    • Hi All,  just thought I would provide an update as I know smooth (Matt) was on this forum from 2003.    my brother Matthew passed away end of may 2024 at the age of 41 from liver failure. I am not sure how many of his original team krazy friends are still on here or active but thought it reasonable to let the forum know.    if you have any photos or pictures it would be great if you could share them.    it took me a while to work out he was active on here.    thanks so much   
×
×
  • Create New...