Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just realised they ran the bimmer in 3rd. Why not 4th? Its a 5 speed and has tiptronic so it would hold gears....

Because auto cars have a 1:1 ratio in 3rd gear.. As opposed to manual cars in 4th.

  • Replies 224
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

5-speed automatic ZF 5 HP 24 EH.

Ratios ( r : 1):

Ratio : 1

Top Speed @ 6,000 RPM

1st 3.57 39 MPH

2nd 2.20 63 MPH

3rd 1.51 92 MPH

4th 1.00 139 MPH

5th 0.83 155 MPH @ 5,500 RPM*

The manual is a 6 speed, so 5th is required for 1:1.

Edited by Ten Four
Dyno is about right with 500+rwhp in a 10sec car.

Sounds like the guys at Autoworx did a good job.

So we come to the conclusion Hypers n Advans dynos are out 150+ hp :( , what MPH should we be running if the 500 hp is right ???

134/137MPH. Jeffs 480rwhp 10.4 was at 136mph. Most 10sec V8s I do are from 450 to 500rwhp running GTR weight.

Really big HP Turbo cars are often slower because you need large Turbos etc giving way to much Lag needing dedicated Gearbox's etc.

Your GTR running 10s and also working well on a race track would be a very smart 500rwhp (Board power curve) with 2 people in the car.

Huge topend power does not make for a fast car, Fat Power / Torque curves do.

5-speed automatic ZF 5 HP 24 EH.

Ratios ( r : 1):

Ratio : 1

Top Speed @ 6,000 RPM

1st 3.57 39 MPH

2nd 2.20 63 MPH

3rd 1.51 92 MPH

4th 1.00 139 MPH

5th 0.83 155 MPH @ 5,500 RPM*

The manual is a 6 speed, so 5th is required for 1:1.

Well there you go, as you can see I didn't research my repsonse in terms of your car :(

5-speed automatic ZF 5 HP 24 EH.

Ratios ( r : 1):

Ratio : 1

Top Speed @ 6,000 RPM

1st 3.57 39 MPH

2nd 2.20 63 MPH

3rd 1.51 92 MPH

4th 1.00 139 MPH

5th 0.83 155 MPH @ 5,500 RPM*

The manual is a 6 speed, so 5th is required for 1:1.

I chose 3rd because I wanted a roller speed between 120 and 180km/hr, in accordance with standard shoot-out proceedure. There's more to it than gearbox ratio - it's overall final drive that matters.

The GTR of the Bart only made 518hp because it was blowing the tyres off. Big deal. I ran the car in 4WD first up and it made good numbers at all 4. The dyno wasnt down. The car wasnt down. 540 or whatever it made at all corners is damn respectable, and backs up the time slips. The low figure in RWD was an issue of coupling one to the other. Do we have any other AWD dyno figures to compare it to?

They probably thought it had 1:1 in 3rd, I doubt they dyno many Beemers.

Levi, fantastic pics mate! I'll have to have a chat with you next time, grab a few tips off you! Can I grab a higher resolution picture of my car?

No problem, always happy to talk cameras.

Bigger Picture

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...