Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah bang for buck it's pretty good, ( be better on E85, diff go's bang ) not bad for a daily

2 points higher, if it was actually higher, would make it run a bee's dick richer, hardly worth plugging the laptop in but!

Or get a gearbox full of third........

2 points higher i would have thought be richer too....Alls i know is that fuel will not be going in my daily ever again....E85 on the other hand hmmmm....

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well the United site lists E85 being sold only at United Tapleys, hopefully they will bring it to Salisbury, then ill seriously consider it.

http://www.unitedpetroleum.com.au/distribu...5-locations.asp

Increasing by 2 points shouldn't make it run like a POS if it ran fine on BP 98 though......different story when decreasing by the same amount.

Apart from running slightly cleaner, the only issue by not tuning to the extra 2 points would be that you would not be taking advantage of the increased octane.

I stand to be corrected by the tuning gurus though. :D

I may be wrong but thought I read the V8 supercars switched to E85 and had a world of issues until they got the tune right. I don't think the RON value is the issue, maybe it's the way the fuel burns which requires the vehicle to be tuned accordingly. I've also heard you will use a third more fuel if tuned correctly thus burning the cost advantage. So ultimately the only advantage to E85 on a standard vehicle would be your conscience effort to support the environment.

I may be wrong but thought I read the V8 supercars switched to E85 and had a world of issues until they got the tune right. I don't think the RON value is the issue, maybe it's the way the fuel burns which requires the vehicle to be tuned accordingly. I've also heard you will use a third more fuel if tuned correctly thus burning the cost advantage. So ultimately the only advantage to E85 on a standard vehicle would be your conscience effort to support the environment.

^^ not entrily true

Less knock and more power even if it uses more fuel you still get more power

yes but on gasolene more power does not always mean you're burning more fuel. Your engine will burn more E85 per Kilowatt than gasolene no matter what the tune, so the cost advantage is moot.

And FWIW I don't think the v8's changed to E85 because they get more power out of it, I think it was enviironmentaly driven............pardon the pun :D

When peeps convert to E85, cost doesn't even come into it, neither does the environment...that's just a bit of cream on the cake.

They do it purely for higher state of tune that can be achieved and extra boost that can be had without the leaning and knocking that pump gas gives you at maximum AFR's and timing.....hence more power, with only injector and fuel component upgrades needed.

My 34 has been runnig on e85 for daily duties for over 9 months now, and there is no issues once tuning and injectors and better fuel pump gets addressed.

To run this fuel you have to add the supporting mods you cant just put it in and expect more power or reliable operation. I did it properly once and the car runs the same as on pump fuel sligtly smoother at idle.

yes but on gasolene more power does not always mean you're burning more fuel. Your engine will burn more E85 per Kilowatt than gasolene no matter what the tune, so the cost advantage is moot.

And FWIW I don't think the v8's changed to E85 because they get more power out of it, I think it was enviironmentaly driven............pardon the pun ;)

Your wrong. My car would ony make 280awkw on 98premium, the day i changed to e85 the car jumped to 300kw with no tuning, and then up to 315awkw with a better tune. So yes e85 does make more power, you do burn slightly more of it, and at the end of the day dont give a hoot how much it costs, i was buying it from scotchers at 1.80 per litre but out at mallala the car is always on redline on every gear change without even the slightest misfire or anything.

Your wrong. My car would ony make 280awkw on 98premium, the day i changed to e85 the car jumped to 300kw with no tuning, and then up to 315awkw with a better tune. So yes e85 does make more power, you do burn slightly more of it, and at the end of the day dont give a hoot how much it costs, i was buying it from scotchers at 1.80 per litre but out at mallala the car is always on redline on every gear change without even the slightest misfire or anything.

that's a bit of a blanket statement, which part of my posts are wrong? To summise I've stated so far:

Yes you need to tune to suit E85

Yes you will get more power on E85

Yes you will use more fuel doing so

Yes the running costs will go up.

So what is so wrong with what I said when you just confirmed all of it.......... :rofl:

And let's not forget that I've stated all this in relation to the GP who drive street cars, not race tuned track cars.

yes but on gasolene more power does not always mean you're burning more fuel. Your engine will burn more E85 per Kilowatt than gasolene no matter what the tune, so the cost advantage is moot.

And FWIW I don't think the v8's changed to E85 because they get more power out of it, I think it was enviironmentaly driven............pardon the pun :rofl:

This bit :P

then I'll make the blanket statement and say YOU are wrong. :rofl:

The press release:

E85 fuel supplier announced

Friday 10/10/2008 13:10

Author: Briar Gunther | Source: BigPond Sport - copyright

V8s at Phillip Island

CSR Ethanol was this morning named as the official fuel supplier of the V8 Supercar Championship Series for 2009 and beyond.

V8 Supercars Australia Chairman Tony Cochrane joined Ian Glasson, the Chief Executive Officer of CSR Sugar – an associated company of CSR Ethanol - at the Supercheap Auto Bathurst 1000 on Friday to make the announcement.

While this year V8 Supercars use a five per cent ethanol blended fuel, next year they will run the E85 fuel which is an 85 per cent ethanol and 15 per cent petroleum blended fuel.

The safety cars will also run on the E85 fuel, which is made from molasses (a byproduct of sugar cane).

“This is one (announcement) that I think we’re particularly proud of at V8 Supercars Australia,” Cochrane said.

“It’s not only a great day for our sport, it’s a great day for the environment, and a great day for renewable energy here in Australia.

“What we consider is one of our key roles in all of this quite frankly is to help educate over the next five years the Australian motoring public in particular.”

Glasson said E85 fuel will substantially lower the greenhouse footprint of motor racing.

“CSR Ethanol is delighted to be part of V8 Supercars to improve the environmental footprint of the sport and also to establish ethanol as a very credible fuel, not only in V8 Supercars but across the Australian motoring public,” he said.

“Every litre of E85 produces about half the greenhouse gas of traditional fuel.

“That’s a very significant improvement and not only is it sustainable but renewable.”

So not environment driven then !!!!!!!

http://envirofuel.com.au/2008/03/01/v8-sup...se-e85-in-2009/

Edited by mosoto

the teams mechanics dont give much away while looking for any advantage they can get, atm they are more interested in economy than power and since e85 can be run much leaner before shit melts thats the direction they are playing, IMO the teams who can afford to run leaner will win, triple 8 have the advantage here because they have lots $$$ and can push there engines further

V8SA's green theme doesnt seem as friendly if someone mentions performance

Your missing the point. A car wil get as much as a 40kw increase by switching to e85 over premium.

Im not fighting the fact that it is an enviro fuel. All im saying is the prformance benefits are quite large. So if you think tyres is what make horsepower in an engne than thats fine. Id rather beleive what my figures say than someones press release.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any difference in induction noise?
    • If I got a dollar for every flipped commuter missile I've driven past I'd have two dollars   Some people get into wild adventures on the road and I doubt it's gender or ethnicity specific. I'm just glad I don't usually drive during peak times.
    • Just got the car back and gave it a good run back home Power wise, whilst it only made a extra 5 killerwasps up top at 7200 rpm, it made more power everywhere from 2500 rpm and kept pulling much harder all the way, to the point of me relearning when to shift so I don't hit the 7200 limiter, with the old intake it seemed to take alot more time to rev out, and, throttle response is also much improved  As I didn't want to remove the bumper every time I serviced the air filter (basically every aftermarket and fabricated CAI has the filter behind the bumper) it currently has a hektic exposed pod in the engine bay sucking in hot air, this will be rectified shortly after some some of my CAD (cardboard assisted design) for a alloy heat shield feed by the OEM intake tube behind the bumper, this will cop some wrinkle black paint, as well as the intake pipe for that totally OEM look... The only fly in the ointment was that the OEM "strut" brace doesn't fit over the rear runner of the new intake with the 2.5 engine is in the engine bay, as the 2.5 raises the engine up by 20mm, it's not a war stopper, and I didn't notice any difference without it in some twisties, but....... MX5 Mania is bringing in some GWR "fancy pants" braces that apparently do fit, if it bolts up I'll grab it, it is also stiffer than the OEM one, which is a bonus All in all I'm happy with the outcome      Fancy pants "strut" brace that gives the required clearance      This is where the clearance issue was, the GWR extends out past this
    • Well, I'm back from the dyno today. Some things do partially make sense. The pod filter/airbox delete picked up between 6-10rwkw on 98 - because heat soak does kind of affect things and there was playing with tune/timing/AFR. Oddly enough, the car was running much leaner than before. So lean it was audibly pinging on the dyno which I got video of:   70de0dd5-2099-4a71-8b10-6fc833fb9d59.mp4   We're talking going from ~12.7 in the past to the first run being at like ~14.0. It is now tuned to ~12.5 on the Dyno, which correlates to about ~12.1 on my wideband in the car. These matched last time, which is very odd. The dyno plots only show the dyno's reported AFR - should be last time, yet now it no longer agrees and was way leaner. Nobody has an explanation for how a pod can make the car run notably leaner, yet not really give any more power when you add fuel in. A few different types of intake design were tested:   94c22c34-7991-4902-af85-314b5f5bf352.mp4   There was no difference other than IAT with the pod sticking out of the bay. The pod sticking out of the bay (but connected) is actually still warmer than what I usually see on the road. Removing the pod entirely lost about ~2kw. But to be fair, all of the runs could be argued to vary by that amount when temperatures climb etc etc. It's safe to say that the filter isn't causing any restrictions of any note that can be reasonably altered in any way. This is in line with what I'd expect given the Engine Masters testing. 323KW on 98 and ~335KW on E85 is actually a pretty solid result, up about ~45kw from 99% of LS1 cammed combos, with generally much larger cams/exhaust etc as well. It is after all up 42KW (98) and 54KW (E85) from before. +10KW from a pod and removing the box is cheap as chips compared to what the head work cost per kw No, I did not get to drop the exhaust and test. When it comes to exhaust... it all just seems to change frequencies and cost or gain 2hp here or there. I don't realistically think I'll drop this to test it - because there's not much else I can really do about it/route it any other way/make it bigger/just bought mufflers. Engine masters beat the hell out of headers with a hammer to deliberately kink them and didn't lose power at all, I sincerely doubt that going larger primaries would help. If it were even possible for clearance/conversion reasons... which it's not... I may throw the E85 in there at some point and do a drag run to see what MPH it traps for science. It isn't lost on me that ~320kw Skylines do trap about the same MPH that ~370kw F-Body/Corvettes do in the USA for the same  or similar weight. (122-125mph). Of course, if I go there and trap 104mph or something then I'll just 'accidentally' have an accident on the way home from the drag strip and buy a M4.
×
×
  • Create New...