Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I replaced my water pump, went to set base timing and was well over the 30 mark, possibly at 50 degrees. Turned out when I put the belt onto the exhaust camshaft, it was one tooth over.

So off comes the timing belt again, everything lined up correctly. Base timing was set to just little over 15, possibly 17 as it wouldnt retard any more. (idle may of been tad high as I had to go off rpm tacho in car)

anyways so take the car for a drive, and it was making 7psi but the car had no power, felt like it had no boost.

I think maybe because I ran the car so long at idle with 50 degrees base timing the ECU has pulled out so much timing that now when I run it theres no power, so i disconnecetd the ecu this morning and will try again tonight.

Im waiting on a wideband controller so i can check the AFR.

But since the car is making boost, the only thing I can think of is fuel or timing as to why it has no power at all.

Any other ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/298428-making-no-power/
Share on other sites

Are you sure it's timed at 15? Some timing lights double the actual reading.

If it's idling at 7.5, then it's probably firing AFTER TDC on boost (ie the piston is already into the power stroke before the fuel/air mixture is ignited). And that is worse than useless for making power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/298428-making-no-power/#findComment-4964412
Share on other sites

If thats the case then I would have to set the timing to 30, but im pretty sure rotating the CAS completly wont take me that far.

I guess I can give it a shot though dont have anything to lose.

How am I suppose to know if the timing light is doubling the reading?

When I take the timming that far out 30+ it would miss at idle, so makes me think its a true reading.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/298428-making-no-power/#findComment-4964526
Share on other sites

its suppose to be a good timing light, borrowed it from a friends mechanic workshop.

Im using the wire that goes into the power transistor that sits at the far back top of the engine. There are 6 wires going into this power transistor, one of the wires has been pulled out of the 6 wire harness, just enough to attach the light too, this is what i used. Admittedly i didn't check if its cylinder #1, but if it wasn't it would be minimum 60 degrees out, which it isn't. But will double check.

If what blind elk said about the timing light showing double, my money is on that's the problem, will set it tonight to 30 degrees and see what happens.

Actually thinking about it, its the wasted spark firing system which would cause the light to show double (doing some research on the net confirms this)

Edited by pauly24
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/298428-making-no-power/#findComment-4965139
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...