Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, i just compared "factory spec" 0-60mph and 1/4mile from R32GTR, R33GTR, R34GTR and I am shocked, could you guys help me justify this please!!

R32GTR 1430kgs

0-60mph 4.7s

1/4mile 13.00

R33GTR 1530kgs

0-60mph 4.9s

1/4mile 14.00 at 104 mph

R34GTR 1540kgs

0-60mph 4.9s

1/4mile 13.7s at 103.5 mph

Results were found from http://www.infinitig35.net/R34/GTR/Specs/

I have always thought that the R34GTR is the fastest stock GTR excluding the R35 of course, but these specs shocked me hard, i own a 1993 R32GTR and always thought the r32gtr is the underdog, after seeing this... all i can say is wow.

Secondly, I would like to know if our skylines have a good chance of beating Holden commodore SS V8 (Stock Vs Stock)? some of them claim to have more than 270KW, however their factory 0-60mph is slower than 5s, could you guys help me clear this argument please.

cheers guys!

-long

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey guys, i just compared "factory spec" 0-60mph and 1/4mile from R32GTR, R33GTR, R34GTR and I am shocked, could you guys help me justify this please!!

R32GTR 1430kgs

0-60mph 4.7s

1/4mile 13.00

R33GTR 1530kgs

0-60mph 4.9s

1/4mile 14.00 at 104 mph

R34GTR 1540kgs

0-60mph 4.9s

1/4mile 13.7s at 103.5 mph

Results were found from http://www.infinitig35.net/R34/GTR/Specs/

I have always thought that the R34GTR is the fastest stock GTR excluding the R35 of course, but these specs shocked me hard, i own a 1993 R32GTR and always thought the r32gtr is the underdog, after seeing this... all i can say is wow.

Secondly, I would like to know if our skylines have a good chance of beating Holden commodore SS V8 (Stock Vs Stock)? some of them claim to have more than 270KW, however their factory 0-60mph is slower than 5s, could you guys help me clear this argument please.

cheers guys!

-long

Firstly, the '270kW' from the Holdens is NOT at the wheels. With small mods most SS's are at 220-230kW, only when they get a cam are they looking at 270kW+ ATW. Secondly, yeah the 32 GTR has always been the fastest. Not a huge surprise though, it just has a better power to weight ratio than the the 33/34.

Weight is a huge issue, think of reducing weight as adding power. Commodores weigh over 1800kg, not including passengers.

Stock v Stock the GTR will f**king eat commodores.

Thats a bit short sighted when you consider drive-train losses of an AWD vehicle not to mention the tremendous amount of torque the SS has. I reckon it would be very close over the quarter. Don't get me wrong the r32 was king in its day and would most definitely wipe the floor with VR and VS SS commodores but its 20 years old. 270kw and 530 NM of torque is nothing to sneeze at and as hard as it is to admit it holden has come a long way in its development of the VE.

I'd love to see a race around a track between the 2.

Thats a bit short sighted when you consider drive-train losses of an AWD vehicle not to mention the tremendous amount of torque the SS has. I reckon it would be very close over the quarter. Don't get me wrong the r32 was king in its day and would most definitely wipe the floor with VR and VS SS commodores but its 20 years old. 270kw and 530 NM of torque is nothing to sneeze at and as hard as it is to admit it holden has come a long way in its development of the VE.

I'd love to see a race around a track between the 2.

Well come on out to the NSW production car champs. There are standard commodores (300kw, 6.0l), evos, wrxs, falcon fpv, and my poor old 20yo gtr running around.

The GTR has not been beaten in a race it started (I only did the first 2 rounds). http://www.ctcnsw.com.au/reports.php

We have 6 rounds next year between Wakefield, Eastern Creek and Bathurst.

As for 32 v 33 v 34 stock for stock.....each of them made 206kw and the 32 was lighter. Sure the factory spec 32 is quicker. Of course there is very little stock (or even if stock not in good original condition) still getting around these days.

go spend 50+k on a new VE commo, v8 6L blah blah watever you want to make it to be.

Or take your 50+k and spend buy a clean r32 gtr. for say 20k.... and go spend the 30k u got left on it in mods..... than see who comes out on top..... No matter how many people like to put shit on the old r32 gtr, for them being old and gunner blow up the second you put your foot into them, for the money you can pick them up for these days.... They will Never be beaten... especially by a Aussie built peace of crap wearing a holden or ford badge.

my 2cent : D

Well come on out to the NSW production car champs. There are standard commodores (300kw, 6.0l), evos, wrxs, falcon fpv, and my poor old 20yo gtr running around.

The GTR has not been beaten in a race it started (I only did the first 2 rounds). http://www.ctcnsw.com.au/reports.php

We have 6 rounds next year between Wakefield, Eastern Creek and Bathurst.

As for 32 v 33 v 34 stock for stock.....each of them made 206kw and the 32 was lighter. Sure the factory spec 32 is quicker. Of course there is very little stock (or even if stock not in good original condition) still getting around these days.

Is yours stock Duncan?

go spend 50+k on a new VE commo, v8 6L blah blah watever you want to make it to be.

Or take your 50+k and spend buy a clean r32 gtr. for say 20k.... and go spend the 30k u got left on it in mods..... than see who comes out on top..... No matter how many people like to put shit on the old r32 gtr, for them being old and gunner blow up the second you put your foot into them, for the money you can pick them up for these days.... They will Never be beaten... especially by a Aussie built peace of crap wearing a holden or ford badge.

my 2cent : D

I believe this post started talking about a stock SS and a stock R32 GTR.

Stock vs stock i'd take the GTR.

Yes the new commodore's have more power and torque however they are also listed at 1700+ KG so 1800+ with driver. That means the power to weight ratio's are similar (6.94 GTR vs 6.3 SS). As the SS is RWD with a lot of torque, it will be much harder to get off the line and up to speed where as the 32 GTR can dial up 5K, sidestep the clutch and disapear without much of a fuss.

The SS will have a little bit more top end but it's got to have the right stretch of road or track to even utilise that advantage and then it will still have to pull back the gap the GTR has gained from getting off the line.

I had a wildly modified soarer in the past that made nearly 400rwkw and it would get slaughtered by GTR's all the time because it didn't have the room required to wind up. Mind you if it did get into 3rd gear on boost it'd be a different story, but it proved to me the point about having usable power.

Hey guys, what's going on in here?

OP: paper stats always fluctuate so they can only ever give you a ballpark to go by. Don't underestimate the SS Commodore...these cars get faster every model they release and the latest are no slugs. Remember that the GTR is always going to be a manual and consequently needs to be driven properly to obtain these 0-100 times, which will not be consistent for every run you do. SS Commodores for most part are auto and if you're taking on one in a drag, you will need something of a good launch because off the line is where the GTR is so fast. If you stuff this up or engage in a rolling drag, do not expect to win because you will run out of steam before the Commodore...particularly as 20 year old engines don't yield their factory power/torque anymore.

Hey guys, i just compared "factory spec" 0-60mph and 1/4mile from R32GTR, R33GTR, R34GTR and I am shocked, could you guys help me justify this please!!

R32GTR 1430kgs

0-60mph 4.7s

1/4mile 13.00

R33GTR 1530kgs

0-60mph 4.9s

1/4mile 14.00 at 104 mph

R34GTR 1540kgs

0-60mph 4.9s

1/4mile 13.7s at 103.5 mph

Results were found from http://www.infinitig35.net/R34/GTR/Specs/

start rant/ Those last 2 are pathetic quarter times, and just proves whoever did them has no idea how to drive, only the R32 time is meh ok, the rest are a joke. The 34 got less mile aswell what a joke. Going buy those figures a WRX should keep up and close are you kidding me!!!/end rant

And why are you getting your info for a car that was never sold to the yanks from a yank website, those guys are just shocking.

After being in Duncans production race car... Those SS commodores DON'T STAND A CHANCE!

The amount of grip the AWD gives when driven in aggression... You could take 50KW off the GTR and it'd still wipe the floor with the SS... The RWD vehicles just CAN'T put the power down to be useful in going uber fast!

I believe this post started talking about a stock SS and a stock R32 GTR.

i find it hard to do the whole VS thing when you car puting a 1989-1994mod, up against a 2009model car..... hows there even a VS?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...