Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They would be rated differently, not sure if that's the issue.

I have an N/A R34 GT Fuel Pump removed at 110,000kms due to upgrade for turbo conversion. I think it will be a standard replacement, if that's what the problem ends up being.

i highly doubt it would be the issue. otherwise all the guys with turbo cars would have issues when they upgraded their pumps.

what is probably happening is that before it was running lean and now it isn't and your coil packs are arcing out as they aren't able to ignite the extra fuel

thanks guys i will acutly look in to it and check da coil packs

beofre i changed da fuel pump i changed my spar plugs and still didnt start so dat when i changed da fuel pump and started doin dat problem yesterday i opened the spar pugs and the first one was da only one black from da puttom and it wasnt oit, do u know wat dat could

thanks

thanks guys i will acutly look in to it and check da coil packs

beofre i changed da fuel pump i changed my spar plugs and still didnt start so dat when i changed da fuel pump and started doin dat problem yesterday i opened the spar pugs and the first one was da only one black from da puttom and it wasnt oit, do u know wat dat could

thanks

thanks guys i will actually look into it and check the coil packs.

before i changed fuel pump i changed my spark plugs and still didn't start so that when i changed the fuel pump and started doing that problem. yesterday i opened the spark plugs and the first one was the only one black from the bottom and it wasn't it, do you know what that could (is? maybe not sure)

not sure if that helps lol =/ tried deciphering it.

it helped a lot. i think he was trying to say at the end that it wasn't oil.

well if it was black but not oil it would've been carbon and unburnt fuel, caused by it running rich or the spark plug not firing.

get a spare spark plug and pull the coil out and hook the spare spark plug up to it and turn the car over to see if it will spark. if it does then swap the spare plug with the one in the engine and try it again to make sure the spark plug isn't dead

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...