Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I'm interested to know from anyone that has or knows of people running a R34 Plazmaman Plenum with after market ECU and Turbo " 3540 " Etc

Anyone here making over 300 - 400 RWKW From Plazmaman R34 Plenum? Or have Dyno reports

Thank you

Edited by dsrturbo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/299653-r34-plazmaman-plenums-hp-out-put/
Share on other sites

The plazmaman plenums are rated at something like 800HP-1000HP of air flow aren't they? So i doubt they would be a resctriction of any sort if that's what you are asking.

Edited by PM-R33
get a life and go read the rb25det dyno results thread

What on earth is up with this comment??? Seems "reading your previous posts" your not a happy guy.

Has anyone actually made over 3-400KW with this Plenum?

Edited by dsrturbo

Well you can make that much power on the factory one mate... so you would very much hope an aftermarket one would do the same now wouldn't you? :(

But yeah, you could just read the dyno results thread. Look at the part list... then look at the power made... you then answer your question with a bit of your own self help :D

I'm confused, what are you actually worried about? It not flowing enough air to support that power? As Ash said, the stock one can flow that much power, so one twice the size obviously will.

These plenums are capable of flowing 1000+ HP. Not only will you experience instant power gains , but you will have the capability to maximize future modifications .

Quote from Plazmamans site.

The plenum isn't going to be a problem anywhere near those power levels.

I have a er34gtt with pon cams, pistons, exhaust gear, rods, link g4,ross balancer, plazma plenum, 3540.82 turbo. 70 pound springs.

At 8psi car makes 275 rwkw. Increase the boost to 17ponds it makes 285kw..

Weve done pressure tests in Exhuast and intercooler and cant figure out why it wont make power. Today i tested the valve springs and none of them are spungy -all fine at 70+ pounds.

I need to rule out the plenum and to do that im asking t see a 400kw or less er34gtt.

Car should make 330+ Kw at 14psi and 380+ at 19 pounds. As our partners cars have with the same turbo using a er33 engine.

Maybe r34 just cant make power.

Next to do is the following:

1. Dial in the exhaust cam.

2. Backpressure test the exhaust manifold/turbo inlet to determine ratio of inlet/exhaust.

Edited by dsrturbo
I have a er34gtt with pon cams, pistons, exhaust gear, rods, link g4,ross balancer, plazma plenum, 3540.82 turbo. 70 pound springs.

At 8psi car makes 275 rwkw. Increase the boost to 17ponds it makes 285kw..

Weve done pressure tests in Exhuast and intercooler and cant figure out why it wont make power. Today i tested the valve springs and none of them are spungy -all fine at 70+ pounds.

I need to rule out the plenum and to do that im asking t see a 400kw or less er34gtt.

Car should make 330+ Kw at 14psi and 380+ at 19 pounds. As our partners cars have with the same turbo using a er33 engine.

Maybe r34 just cant make power.

Next to do is the following:

1. Dial in the exhaust cam.

2. Backpressure test the exhaust manifold/turbo inlet to determine ratio of inlet/exhaust.

You are expecting to get 380+rwkw from a GT35R with a 0.82 rear? Is this a Rb25/30 or just an RB25?

You are expecting to get 380+rwkw from a GT35R with a 0.82 rear? Is this a Rb25/30 or just an RB25?

Same turbo on r33gtst engine is making 330 at 14psi. Using a r32 Computer and 300zx air flow meter and de cam shafts. Hub Dyno. Same Dyno, same tuner

Even at 17 pounds Engine should be making more power than 285. Its only 10kw difference and yet 9psi Increase.

Above comments Is next to do

Edited by dsrturbo

I think that .82 housing is going to stop you from making 380rwkw, but we shall see. Back to your original problem.

The plenum isn't the problem. You got any dyno graphs you could show us?

When you say you tested the exhaust and intercooler, did you drop the exhaust at the dump/cat to test that?

^ hub dyno's is not RWKW mate. Lukas - that is why he is higher than normal.

If boost goes up, power does not = exhaust restriction most of the time.

Have you even dropped the exhaust from the dump/front pipe and seen what happens? (im dubious of this "pressure" testing you've done when its as simple as 3 bolts)

Are you 100% sure the cam/gears are all dialled in correctly?

I think that .82 housing is going to stop you from making 380rwkw, but we shall see. Back to your original problem.

The plenum isn't the problem. You got any dyno graphs you could show us?

When you say you tested the exhaust and intercooler, did you drop the exhaust at the dump/cat to test that?

Yeh dont take the exhaust off at the turbo and test haha. I also think that the 0.82 will restrict you from that power level. Are you 100% sure they aren't running a 1.06 rear housing or something? Have you checked that your cat hasn't collapsed?

I think that .82 housing is going to stop you from making 380rwkw, but we shall see. Back to your original problem.

The plenum isn't the problem. You got any dyno graphs you could show us?

When you say you tested the exhaust and intercooler, did you drop the exhaust at the dump/cat to test that?

We put a pressure tester in the oxygen sensor hole and did a run. The result was 2psi. Could be better but that is not the problem

^ hub dyno's is not RWKW mate. Lukas - that is why he is higher than normal.

If boost goes up, power does not = exhaust restriction most of the time.

Have you even dropped the exhaust from the dump/front pipe and seen what happens? (im dubious of this "pressure" testing you've done when its as simple as 3 bolts)

Are you 100% sure the cam/gears are all dialled in correctly?

Ah ok well then that makes a lot more sense.

Yeh dont take the exhaust off at the turbo and test haha. I also think that the 0.82 will restrict you from that power level. Are you 100% sure they aren't running a 1.06 rear housing or something? Have you checked that your cat hasn't collapsed?

Piston Compression test no not yet. Possible cause. But i asked Tuner and he sai unlikly. CP and pauta rods. Will test tho next run ( no smoke or problems - tuner would pick up ? )

Piston Compression test no not yet. Possible cause. But i asked Tuner and he sai unlikly. CP and pauta rods. Will test tho next run ( no smoke or problems - tuner would pick up ? )

huh? I was just wondering if the cat had collapsed. hahaha sorry if you thought I meant do a compression test.

^ hub dyno's is not RWKW mate. Lukas - that is why he is higher than normal.

If boost goes up, power does not = exhaust restriction most of the time.

Have you even dropped the exhaust from the dump/front pipe and seen what happens? (im dubious of this "pressure" testing you've done when its as simple as 3 bolts)

Are you 100% sure the cam/gears are all dialled in correctly?

Cam gears dialed in will be done next. However tuner has asked other tuners advice and they say if car makes 275 on 96 octane at 8psi. It should have no trouble making more power dialed or not. Im pretty sure the dynaPack Dyno is in rear wheel kw. I will have to ask about this?

Edited by dsrturbo
huh? I was just wondering if the cat had collapsed. hahaha sorry if you thought I meant do a compression test.

Cat like catconverta? It has no cat it has been removed. VT has been turn off and on with no significant difference

Right now its a odd ball. Because alot of money has been spent on te engine to only make 275kw :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...