Jump to content
SAU Community

Challange Street Spec Resonated Mid Pipe


GT-Ricer
 Share

Recommended Posts

For sale: Almost new (500km) R35 Challenge Street Spec (twin-resonated cat-less 76mm/3") Mid Pipe.

Imported from USA, cost $1150, will take $800 ONO.

Proven power gains 17kW over stock with no ECU tune.

Verified 0-100kph 3.65 sec vs. 3.85 sec stock and 1.5 sec/lap gain at Eastern Creek.

Great sound, quite "sporty" at WOT and not too loud at cruising speed.

I decided to sell it because I am getting a complete mid pipe/cat back system.

PM for more info.

post-62393-1260453298_thumb.jpg

post-62393-1260453499_thumb.jpg

post-62393-1260453570_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Pre Christmas sale: $700 for a beautifully engineered piece! Come on guys, you know you want it!

202 views, 250 R35 GT-Rs in the country and not one bite?

Am I selling it too cheap or is the quality too high? :P

Edited by GT-Ricer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

202 views, 250 R35 GT-Rs in the country and not one bite?

Am I selling it too cheap or is the quality too high? :)

To be honest mate it just doesn't look as good as the Willall titanium pipe for around the same money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest mate it just doesn't look as good as the Willall titanium pipe for around the same money

Thanks for your honesty. At last...it took 200+ views to get some feedback!

LOOKs good or PERFORMs better? I think this one LOOKS fantastic, so nice and shiny and without any of those short titanium section welds every few centimeters.

Unfortunately no matter how lovely it looks you only get to see it for a few minutes max and then the hoist goes down and the show is over for good...

As for all those "weight savings" achieved with fashionable titanium bits, next time fill the tank with 10litres less fuel and you will save $15 and 7.5kg straight away...LOL

When it comes to the price, it's negotiable, provided it goes to a good home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Thanks for your honesty. At last...it took 200+ views to get some feedback!

LOOKs good or PERFORMs better? I think this one LOOKS fantastic, so nice and shiny and without any of those short titanium section welds every few centimeters.

Unfortunately no matter how lovely it looks you only get to see it for a few minutes max and then the hoist goes down and the show is over for good...

As for all those "weight savings" achieved with fashionable titanium bits, next time fill the tank with 10litres less fuel and you will save $15 and 7.5kg straight away...LOL

When it comes to the price, it's negotiable, provided it goes to a good home.

Sold it yet ?

If not send me a text to 0417 909 273.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...