Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is what a freind told me when I asked why he swicthed from a gt30 to a big turbo like the T04Z...I was kinda shocked of his response..this is on a rb25. I think it may be built.. Hope this helps!!

"Power wise there are a few t04z's in good combo's making 800+hp.

I went from GT30 which was like a light switch into boost and not easy to drive to a GT35, i was diapointed by the GT35's added lag and lack of top end punch and thus went to T04z in full twin scroll, in 3rd, 4th or 5th i make 2bar boost by 4200rpm and I rev to 8500... this is a massive power band, even in 2nd im making enough boost ligth up the 285 RE55's by 5000rpm still leaving it with 3500rpm of power band. My main reason to go T04z was that i circuit race more than anything else and the progresive nature and smooth spool up of the T04z make it much easier to control than the "hair trigger" smaller turbos. Most of my video i have of the T04z is just mess around stuff, I have video of it on the hub dyno putting out close to 600kw/788hp at 2.25bar boost, that said most of my usage is at 1.2 1.3bar where the car is very easy to drive."

i wouldnt reffer to a T04Z on a stock capacity 26 as responsive, if you want boost at 3000 look into a GT3076 with a 0.82 rear however on 98 pump fuel it will be limited to ~320rwkw.

any particular reason you want 380kw?

380kw or 380rwkw?

380rwkw - .60, forget it. Not a chance unless using race fuel

380kw - 320rwkw.. again, shit up a hill.

A T04Z front end is capable of over 400rwkw. To even let it enter discussion below that level is pointless.

i wouldnt reffer to a T04Z on a stock capacity 26 as responsive, if you want boost at 3000 look into a GT3076 with a 0.82 rear however on 98 pump fuel it will be limited to ~320rwkw.

any particular reason you want 380kw?

Agreed.

Thank you for your kind words

380awkw is 380awkw - on a 4WD

i have been given a T04z off a sr20 hence the 0.61 rear housing i am aware of other logical turbo choices to acheive my desired power output) - but this cost money :)

i have noticed the 1.0 rear housing is the way to go on rb26 to see over 400awkw

When you say not a chance unless on race fuel - what is the reasoning behind this? greater oxygen for combustion? it still comes out the small exhaust housing?

My concerns are surge?

My thoughts are - if a 6 cylinder is boosting this thing it should come in alot earlier - such as 3000rpm? obviously there would be a trade off - ie top end? hence 380awkw would be wishful thinking :)

I dont really care if you think this would be a pointless discussion - at least i will understand the reasonings behind different exhaust housings and possibly what may eventuate.

i am currently making 320awkw on twin trust turbos and i am contemplating whether this would be feasible upgrade

Cheers!

380kw or 380rwkw?

380rwkw - .60, forget it. Not a chance unless using race fuel

380kw - 320rwkw.. again, shit up a hill.

A T04Z front end is capable of over 400rwkw. To even let it enter discussion below that level is pointless.

Agreed.

This is what a freind told me when I asked why he swicthed from a gt30 to a big turbo like the T04Z...I was kinda shocked of his response..this is on a rb25. I think it may be built.. Hope this helps!!

"Power wise there are a few t04z's in good combo's making 800+hp.

I went from GT30 which was like a light switch into boost and not easy to drive to a GT35, i was diapointed by the GT35's added lag and lack of top end punch and thus went to T04z in full twin scroll, in 3rd, 4th or 5th i make 2bar boost by 4200rpm and I rev to 8500... this is a massive power band, even in 2nd im making enough boost ligth up the 285 RE55's by 5000rpm still leaving it with 3500rpm of power band. My main reason to go T04z was that i circuit race more than anything else and the progresive nature and smooth spool up of the T04z make it much easier to control than the "hair trigger" smaller turbos. Most of my video i have of the T04z is just mess around stuff, I have video of it on the hub dyno putting out close to 600kw/788hp at 2.25bar boost, that said most of my usage is at 1.2 1.3bar where the car is very easy to drive."

interesting comments - the setup will be circuit orientated as well, does the progressive nature of the power spool equate to better times or loss times around a track :)

.60 rear would choke it down to probably 300-330rwkw give/take - it's hard to pin exactly.

The T04Z is a 800-850hp compressor, with a rear end that isn't going to flow much at all. It would have been restrictive on the SR as well. I would have thought a larger housing would have been used. Silly to put a Z on a SR with a .60, much better combinations out there for the money.

A .60 is virtually what a gts-t hi-flow is to give you an idea. Most of them peak out around 260-280 give/take.

Which trust items do you have on there currently?

Unless you just buy a larger rear housing for it I don't think its going to be an upgrade at all. Lot of cost & expense for nothing.

It could also surge indeed with a small rear like that, it'll be turning the front end very early so you might have minor surge issues in lower RPM's as boost builds - i had a similar issue with a GT30 with the largest comp wheel. about 2000rpm every so slight which hurt boost build a tad and a tiny bump in the ramp up on the graph (we guessed about 200-300rpm by the graph)

Comments on race fuel etc was as you were thinking. Same volume on the out, just better combustions going on inside for that amount of air.

side note - rwkw/awkw same thing for GTR's really (i assume you are talking GTR here). It's not a full time 50/50 split like other 4WD cars.

interesting comments - the setup will be circuit orientated as well, does the progressive nature of the power spool equate to better times or loss times around a track :)

If you are going circuit then you don't want a t04z unless you need big numbers.

I totally disagree with meet07's friend or whatever about the GT30. My setup was excellent and power came on nicely. Not uncontrollable at all.

The t04z would come on with a hard rush which you would think would make it harder to drive.

Friend of mine pulled OFF a t04z and went back to twin low mounts for this reason.

As Ash said, the 0.60 rear will choke it too much. I would be surprised if it saw over 330awkw.

As for spooling earlier due to being 6 cylinder, that is nonsense. An SR20 will spool that turbo exactly the same as your RB26 will. It has to do with exhaust pulses and the amount each cylinder displaces each stroke.

Also, Ash - T04Z is only rated to 750+hp which is a very generous 800 engine hp if you were really lucky and pushing boost over 2 bar.

As Ash said, the 0.60 rear will choke it too much. I would be surprised if it saw over 330awkw.

As for spooling earlier due to being 6 cylinder, that is nonsense. An SR20 will spool that turbo exactly the same as your RB26 will. It has to do with exhaust pulses and the amount each cylinder displaces each stroke.

Also, Ash - T04Z is only rated to 750+hp which is a very generous 800 engine hp if you were really lucky and pushing boost over 2 bar.

i was in the ballpark lol >_<

I know GT35's are 700hp - 380rwkw or so - took a stab around 800hp being you can make 440rwkw off a Z if you wanted to.

Probably could have googled... to much effort though :)

i was in the ballpark lol >_<

I know GT35's are 700hp - 380rwkw or so - took a stab around 800hp being you can make 440rwkw off a Z if you wanted to.

Probably could have googled... to much effort though :)

Yeah, with turbos it's never really exact anyway. That's why they say 750+. Your 800hp guess is not inaccurate

Generally with a T04Z running 26-28psi I have seen them touch on 500rwkw almost. 475rwkw on Gervase's RB26 with a 0.8 rear and 494rwkw on Michaels RB26 with a 1.0 rear both running about 26-28psi.

You don't tend to make too much more than that on a Z though. With that 0.6 rear this guy is talking about, I reckon he might be able to force it to 380rwkw with very high boost but it is going to generate a lot of heat in the process and the turbo is going to suffer as a result.

Ye same, i don't think you'd even be able to push that much out.

It'll be det'in like crazy due to the backpressure and then the heat as well as you say, similar to having a blocked cat - will only make so much power and anything more goes nowhere.

I'd like to see it done though just for shits and giggles aint my motor >_<

i have been given a T04z off a sr20 hence the 0.61 rear housing i am aware of other logical turbo choices to acheive my desired power output) - but this cost money >_<

Here is a reallity check for you, there are 3 options below but you can only choose 2 of them:

1) cheap

2) reliable

3) fast

Pick any combination of two and the third one is not possible.

Edited by W0rp3D
Ye same, i don't think you'd even be able to push that much out.

It'll be det'in like crazy due to the backpressure and then the heat as well as you say, similar to having a blocked cat - will only make so much power and anything more goes nowhere.

I'd like to see it done though just for shits and giggles aint my motor >_<

that is what im afraid of - it would be interesting to see whether anybody out ther has experienced a change in exhaust housing and have dyno graphs to show. I have seen this done with a sr20 with a 1.0 to 0.8 to see a much more responsive turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...