Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

to be honest i would only look at these setups if your really on a budget. The manifolds become bit of a restriction at anything over 280rwkw (we have made alot more but exhaust pressures are way high), we just swapped out a std manifold (gt3582) for a low mount merge collector getup and it transformed the car.

Edited by URAS

Sweet figure there Trent as 280rwkw is what i was aiming for :cool:

See i'm from the Caribbean and its hot as shit right through so i want to keep under bonnet temps down as much as possible therefore not looking at those ss high/low mount manifolds....... not to mention our 95 fuel makes things so much better.

My friend has one of those high mounts installed and has constant problems with coil packs.

This system also "kills two birds with one stone" as it provides a spot to mount the wastegate and a spacer to clear the compressor

Foolboost pic shows a 44mm wastegate right?

Wouldnt that be too big for my application?

I'm on quite a budget with my build and am using a Hypergear ATR28G4 IW on the stock manifold.

Plan is to eventually run an external gate on the stock manifold.

I have a spare stock manifold and a die grinder and plan to port match to the gasket on both ends of the stock manifold and maybe abit of ceramic coating.

Will this make a difference on the amount of power that can be made?

yes it will. when I was using my HX35 on the stock manifold it made around 280rwkw and had boost control issues. now with the external gate welded to the manifold on the same boost it makes 326rwkw on 19 psi. there would be no more in it though. there is probably a huge amount of back pressure but no detonation.

300 is the realistic limit.

What Island are you on bro? We'll be docked in Sint Maarten/St Barths for a while.

If you go with the stock manifold, take the time to match port it to a set of gaskets at least. If you can, get someone to media blast the inside too with some fairly aggressive abrasive.

Good luck.

Sweet figure there Trent as 280rwkw is what i was aiming for :)

See i'm from the Caribbean and its hot as shit right through so i want to keep under bonnet temps down as much as possible therefore not looking at those ss high/low mount manifolds....... not to mention our 95 fuel makes things so much better.

Brisbane RB30 guru's JW Automotive mount GT3540's on not only stock VL turbo manifolds but also have done RB25 manifolds for Godzilla Motorsport. They have given lots of proven results for a considerable amount of time now. They use a Turbosmart external gate mounted along the manifold and a small laser cut spacer plate to give clearance for the turbo. Excellent boost control using this method and have quite a number of cars running 9's and 10's with this set-up.

Brisbane RB30 guru's JW Automotive mount GT3540's on not only stock VL turbo manifolds but also have done RB25 manifolds for Godzilla Motorsport. They have given lots of proven results for a considerable amount of time now. They use a Turbosmart external gate mounted along the manifold and a small laser cut spacer plate to give clearance for the turbo. Excellent boost control using this method and have quite a number of cars running 9's and 10's with this set-up.

When u say mounted "along" the manifold what exactly do u mean???

When u say mounted "along" the manifold what exactly do u mean???

hole cut in manifold and small pipe section complete with flange welded on...quite simple really and looks very neat. Justin is a top class welder also....he welded a trust TD06 flange on a S14 HKS manifold that we needed to modify last night and you would swear it was done by a robot!

Edited by DiRTgarage

Yeh alot of ppl seem to have done this with good results

I guess its a matter of getting it weld right to avoid cracking.

What would be better though... welding the flange directly on the manifold like in the pic i posted earlier or welding in a short piece of pipe with the flange on the end?

I guess the only advantage of welding a piece of pipe allows me to place the gate where i want it?

Also what size gate is recommended for this set up......Rb25, Gt3076 / .63, stock manifolds, 280rwkw which should be around 16-18psi-ish

I was originally going to use a 38mm but in the dyno thread saw some ppl using up to 44mm with this turbo.

What Island are you on bro? We'll be docked in Sint Maarten/St Barths for a while.

If you go with the stock manifold, take the time to match port it to a set of gaskets at least. If you can, get someone to media blast the inside too with some fairly aggressive abrasive.

Good luck.

You're far still bro..... I'm at the end of the chain

Trinidad :ninja:

You're far still bro..... I'm at the end of the chain

Trinidad :ninja:

Ha ha ha ha ha... yeah. We don't get down that far. There seems to be quite a skyline/nissan/import scene going on down there... I know a couple of guys in Florida that send alot of gear and built rb's down your way. Might have to check it out some time.

For my GF's rb25, we cut a hole in the center of the collector, then welded a mounting plate directly to the manifold, bolted a 38mm turbosmart wastegate on and plumbed it back into the exhaust.

J.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
×
×
  • Create New...