Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.testdrivenau.co.cc/?p=553

I'm guessing the M35 they tested was slightly modified - as is visible by the non-standard exhaust and rims.

However going by the comments made regarding turbo noise, I'd say the turbo itself was the factory item. This also means that boost is likely to be unmodified and therefore there is no reason to believe there are any other modifications to the engine/driveline.

Some impressive performance stats, but it still leaves me wondering - because I doubt very much my (stock) M35 would come close...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/300095-m35-stagea-vs-ve-sportwagon/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

http://www.testdrivenau.co.cc/?p=553

I'm guessing the M35 they tested was slightly modified - as is visible by the non-standard exhaust and rims.

However going by the comments made regarding turbo noise, I'd say the turbo itself was the factory item. This also means that boost is likely to be unmodified and therefore there is no reason to believe there are any other modifications to the engine/driveline.

Some impressive performance stats, but it still leaves me wondering - because I doubt very much my (stock) M35 would come close...

Nice read, Steve. Thanks.

Dunno about how factual the 0-100 times are for the Stag... with a standard turbo.

Just so as you know, my high flow makes the same loud noise as the stock one did when I first bought it, so it could be running something not-entirely OE.

Stock M35 v VE SS not even close? I think that perhaps you need to play a bit more... Pretty damn close in stock trim.

Oh, and it is a Kakimoto exhaust in case you were wondering :thumbsup:

Nice read, Steve. Thanks.

Dunno about how factual the 0-100 times are for the Stag... with a standard turbo.

Just so as you know, my high flow makes the same loud noise as the stock one did when I first bought it, so it could be running something not-entirely OE.

Ok - there you go. I wouldn't be surprised if it was modified - 5.6sec 0-100km seems a little low for me.

Stock M35 v VE SS not even close? I think that perhaps you need to play a bit more... Pretty damn close in stock trim.

Oh, and it is a Kakimoto exhaust in case you were wondering :D

Maybe I'm just not familiar with the VE SS? The thing is the new sportwagon with the V6 SIDI (wondering if holden know of anything other than "spark ignition" but we'll let them think they have something special) has similar specs on paper to the M35...but it's heavier. A guy at work here who has one proudly asked me the specs of my M35 and became a little less enthusiastic thereafter...still, in the mind of the average holden enthusiast - 4 extra kw means the holden is faster right? :thumbsup:

I'd agree with all the comments made regarding ride & handling, the M35 really does drive so much nicer than any other wagon I've ever been in. I'm willing to bet that if the M35 was sold here locally it would be more often compared with the likes of VW, Subaru, Audi, BMW than Ford/Holden.

BS....I've driven one....the VE would eat a standard M35.......may not in the wet....but around somewhere like Eastern Creek the VE would be GONE!!!!!!......the only stag the would give it a run is a standard RS260

but for 55K on the VE!!!!....you'd have a lot of spare cash for mods on an M35!!!!

Problem #1 - 180km limiter!

Problem #2 - brakes are alot better on the VE

Problem #3 - 6 years difference in tech

Problem #4 - Our auto gearbox is shit....FULLSTOP!

Problem #5 - well the list would go on

Our 8 year old cars still have more tech than a new GM...

Cruse control with distance sensors anyone... Factory reversing Cameras... Proper Factory Sat Nav... Part time AWD...

And our 5-speed gearbox wipes the floor with the 6-speed in the Commodores.. Unlike the Ford 6-speed, which is also used by Jag and BMW, the unit used by GM feels like it is from a decade ago..

Don't know about yours, but part throttle changes are so smooth on my ARX... Even full throttle changes are nicely controlled, with engine and transmission speaking to each other fluently.

Problem #3 - 6 years difference in tech

Problem #4 - Our auto gearbox is shit....FULLSTOP!

Problem #1 - 180km limiter!

Not a big deal on a road car - that review never mentioned racing on a circuit :(

Problem #3 - 6 years difference in tech

Haha, yeah, but the other way...

Find me something any Holden has that Nissan or some other Jap manufacturer didn't invent in the 90's.

Problem #4 - Our auto gearbox is shit....FULLSTOP!

agreed...but is the VE one better?

Problem #5 - well the list would go on

Yep, such as:

* no awd (= traction issues in the wet that gets worse the more torque you have)

* no climate control

* lack of boot space (the review says it has more but I disagree - the M35 has loads of room under the boot as well as the full use of all boot space to the roof due to the rear boot shape).

* fuel usage

* no turbo

* excessive price

I've been through this exercise many times, especially when deciding on the M35 vs another car. No other car can offer ALL of the features of the M35 (or C34 for that matter) at anywhere near the price.

ok now for the person who thinks that a ve wagopn is anywhere near the speed of the stag. fair wnough i have never driven a m35 but i have a series 2 rs4s. i went and test drove a ve ss 6 speed, it had previously belonged to the owner of the car yard, he had fitted a chip, exhasust, suspension (and wheels but not power/handling improvement). it basically comes down to it feels like a stag before boost comes on, i just sat there waiting for the power to come and it never did. :( also i think its sad when you have to drop from 6th to 3rd at 100 just to over take. (my wife has a 6 speed zzt231r celica and it effortless overtakes in a quick drop to 5th for the average knob and 4th if you are beside a teenager/hoon who wantys to give a quick squirt as you overtake)

at the end of the day the ve is the same shit enigne they built 50 years ago just bigger.

edit:- and yes the stag boot is bigger then the ve boot (he tried to use the fact that its got a roll out cover as a selling point)

ok now for the person who thinks that a ve wagopn is anywhere near the speed of the stag. fair wnough i have never driven a m35 but i have a series 2 rs4s. i went and test drove a ve ss 6 speed, it had previously belonged to the owner of the car yard, he had fitted a chip, exhasust, suspension (and wheels but not power/handling improvement). it basically comes down to it feels like a stag before boost comes on, i just sat there waiting for the power to come and it never did. :banana: also i think its sad when you have to drop from 6th to 3rd at 100 just to over take. (my wife has a 6 speed zzt231r celica and it effortless overtakes in a quick drop to 5th for the average knob and 4th if you are beside a teenager/hoon who wantys to give a quick squirt as you overtake)

at the end of the day the ve is the same shit enigne they built 50 years ago just bigger.

edit:- and yes the stag boot is bigger then the ve boot (he tried to use the fact that its got a roll out cover as a selling point)

Really

So your rs4 is standard too?

If you think I am a fan of the VE your are seriously mistaken....fact is fact....it is a quicker car than ANY standard Stag....C34 or M35....like I said the only car that would give it a is the rs260. If your to compare a 2002 model Holden with a 2002 Stagea you are right though.

lol sorry I know you guys are died-in-the-wool Stagea nuts, but anyone who seriously thinks a stock M35 would keep up with a current model SS in a straight line has their hand on it. I love M35s but please, take your blinkers off.

Really

So your rs4 is standard too?

If you think I am a fan of the VE your are seriously mistaken....fact is fact....it is a quicker car than ANY standard Stag....C34 or M35....like I said the only car that would give it a is the rs260. If your to compare a 2002 model Holden with a 2002 Stagea you are right though.

Surely the 14sec 1/4 is slow for the V8 though...because the M35 realistically can do just below 7sec 0-100 and just under 15 sec down the 1/4 mile - which is pretty good if you consider the M35 is running about half the displacement of the V8 (even if you factor in boost).

I think a fairer comparison would be the new 3.6L SIDI VE wagon. Still way more expensive, although if you wait 6-8 years it may be around the same price as our stags on the 2nd hand market.

M35 2.5T = 206(+)kw @ 6400rpm & 407N-m @ 3200rpm - 1680kg = 122.6 kw/tonne

VE 3.6L = 210kw @ 6400rpm & 350N-m @ 2900rpm - 1767kg = 118.8 kw/tonne

Another interesting one (even though we cant get it here) is the VQ30DD (direct injection) model.

M35 3L DI = 190kw @ 6400rpm & 324N-m @ 3600rpm

VE 3.0L DI = 190kw @ 6700rpm & 290N-m @ 2900rpm

Who said 6 years newer tech? the M35 3L direct injection came out in 2001 with the same power (at lower revs) and more torque than the VE in 2009. Fuel economy in this model M35 is also very good. One owner on here was getting less than 10L/100km in city driving alone - whereas the 3L VE is listed as 12L/100km. I cant compare the "ADR combined" fuel economy figure because the M35 doesn't have one.

Haha, yeah, but the other way...

Find me something any Holden has that Nissan or some other Jap manufacturer didn't invent in the 90's.

DSC?

lol sorry I know you guys are died-in-the-wool Stagea nuts, but anyone who seriously thinks a stock M35 would keep up with a current model SS in a straight line has their hand on it. I love M35s but please, take your blinkers off.

Having driven both, I would agree.... depending on your definition of keeping up.

Being that I got into it with a VE SS when my M35 was stock, I can say that whilst the SS DID slowly creep away above a certain speed, it certainly did not walk away.

Yes it was dry and yes it was a straight line.... and yes, it was with a test vehicle down near Koo Wee Rup (suburb near Lang Lang).

Still seem to think that perhaps Kamikazee had an influencing hand in that writeup... perhaps to sell more M35's?

No way can they do 0-100 in 5.6secs with just a cat-back. No. Way.

It could if you put smaller tyres on it. Looks to me like the wheels are a lot smaller than stock which would give the impression on the speedo you were going a lot faster, and also help lower the gear ratio a bit.

It could if you put smaller tyres on it. Looks to me like the wheels are a lot smaller than stock which would give the impression on the speedo you were going a lot faster, and also help lower the gear ratio a bit.

You raise a valid point. My speedo is out by around 7% so that when it says 100 I'm actually only doing about 93. I wonder if they factored that kind of thing into their timing. Smaller wheels would exaggerate this even further...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
×
×
  • Create New...