Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This facade that RBR are putting on in regards to equal billing is turning fans away.

Do they believe that we are so stupid not to catch on?

RBR can go and choke on a bag of Dicks!

If it wasn't for Capt Chin having decent success, I am sure we would all just walk away from giving them any sort of support

No doubt they will be 1-2 after the race,

Hopefully MW in front.

However I will be rubbing every lucky foot and Voodoo Doll I have to see I'matool spear off into the country side.

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yeah I didn't understand that. I started punching the couch when he qualied first. Can't stand him anymore.

Noticed Nando was taking a looong hard look at the RB6 after qualifying though. He might think theres something suss (but we all know he is prone to have a sook).

Hopefully Webber finishes first, SV and FA tangle, and Hamilton second :thumbsup:

not to side with RBR but I probably would have done the same thing given that Vettel is ahead in the championship and therefore you would try to give him the best opportunity of winning the WDC.

Of course my main gripe is that RBR did not provide the same support to Webber when he was leading the championship, by giving poor team orders in the sphincter of the universe in both the race and qualifying and using the bad strategy for Canada when clearly they should have made it Webber ahead of Vettel given their relative positions in the WDC at that time.

It's obvious to see where RBR's allegience lies, I guess Webber signed on for further years because he thinks RBR is still the best chance for a WDC win in the coming years, but he'll be saddened to find out he'll just end up like Barachello.

not to side with RBR but I probably would have done the same thing given that Vettel is ahead in the championship and therefore you would try to give him the best opportunity of winning the WDC.

Of course my main gripe is that RBR did not provide the same support to Webber when he was leading the championship, by giving poor team orders in the sphincter of the universe in both the race and qualifying and using the bad strategy for Canada when clearly they should have made it Webber ahead of Vettel given their relative positions in the WDC at that time.

It's obvious to see where RBR's allegience lies, I guess Webber signed on for further years because he thinks RBR is still the best chance for a WDC win in the coming years, but he'll be saddened to find out he'll just end up like Barachello.

Webber has been in front of Vettel, had a better quaifying record this year, has won as mang GPs as Vettel this year, there are still 10 GPs to go... Vettel being ahead on points means very little at the moment.

Earlier in the year was Helmut Marko at every GP? I recall that he used to only turn up to the occassional race and often commented from a distance about the team. Interesting to see him in the pits the last few weekends since the sphincter of the universe! ???????

Webber has been in front of Vettel, had a better quaifying record this year, has won as mang GPs as Vettel this year, there are still 10 GPs to go... Vettel being ahead on points means very little at the moment.

Earlier in the year was Helmut Marko at every GP? I recall that he used to only turn up to the occassional race and often commented from a distance about the team. Interesting to see him in the pits the last few weekends since the sphincter of the universe! ???????

If you're talking head to head Vettel leads Webber 5-4 in qualifying, I believe.

5-5 So even stevens now. So Webber was 5-4 up on Vettel

Whats the bet that if Webber is able to shadow (if) Vettel up to the first pit stop he gets no chace of jumping with either an early or later stop. They will be pulled in within a lap of one another meaning status quo

5-5 So even stevens now. So Webber was 5-4 up on Vettel

Whats the bet that if Webber is able to shadow (if) Vettel up to the first pit stop he gets no chace of jumping with either an early or later stop. They will be pulled in within a lap of one another meaning status quo

No, 5-4 includes yesterday. It was 4-all

Hang on , wires are being crossed here. Silverstone is the 10th GP of the season. So how do you have 5-4????

Bahrian: Vettel

Australia: Vettel

Malaysia: Webber

China: Vettel

Spain : Webber

Monaco: Webber

the sphincter of the universe: Webber

Canada: Webber

European GP: Vettel

Silverstone: Vettel

Hang on , wires are being crossed here. Silverstone is the 10th GP of the season. So how do you have 5-4????

Bahrian: Vettel

Australia: Vettel

Malaysia: Webber

China: Vettel

Spain : Webber

Monaco: Webber

the sphincter of the universe: Webber

Canada: Webber

European GP: Vettel

Silverstone: Vettel

I think I forgot the one where neither of them got pole

Very obvious where the RBR allegiance lies. They should have said sorry seb, yours got damaged mark kept his in good nick. there's f**k all difference anyway so just get out there and get on it.

To actually take it off one drivers car and put it on the others is showing that with only 12 points difference at the halfway point in the season they are already using any chance to give Vettel an advantage and make sure he wins WDC not Webber.

if it was 3 races to go and vettel had 20 points on his teammate then sure. but now it's just a flimsy excuse.

I'm going to tip that the first three places will be as qualified. Much as I want to see webber get up I don't think he'll be able to get around vetool

Hmmm with mark on the dirty side he'll be lucky to be third by the end of the 2nd corner, Having said that i hope mark rips that little prats wing of into turn one. :banana:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, thumbsup from me. The distant shot of the bay just looks same-same as before.
    • Dad had a court case drag out with them from 1998 to 2004. He was in a not at fault accident, NRMA were the ones who covered the other person. They tried to blame his neck injuries on the fact he'd had an injury in 1981 on his extreme lower back where he slipped a single disc right near the bottom. Had been all cleared from that injury for years. This accident destroyed his shoulder, and f**ked a heap of discs in his neck, and he still has major problems with it to this day. Sarah's sister while on her L plates had a small Suzuki Alto, she had stopped to give way to an ambulance, and someone changed lanes behind her because there lane was also slowing, and rear ended her at 80km/h. (She had been stopped for a few seconds already too!). Car was completely f**kED. NRMA sent the vehicle around to 3 different workshops as they kept claiming "We believe it can be repaired, and not written off, we just need to find the correct workshop". It took 3 months, and a lot of arguing before they'd concede and wrote it and paid out. About two years later her sister had a Lancer, someone pulled out of a stop sign without stopping (in an 80 zone). Her sister swerved, hit the front of the other persons car (Instead of dead t-boning the drivers door), which ramped her Lancer, and made it roll multiple times down the road. It hit every panel on the way through. Her sister had slid her self out of the car, and remembers the ambos walking to the accident (They'd been sitting at a set of lights just down the road and witnessed it) and they were saying "Well, this ones going to be a fatality, no way you can walk away from that". Well, she did. And then NRMA sent two assessors out to look at the car, both of which wrote it off. They tried to send another assessor out, except a HUGE uproar was raised, and they FINALLY paid it out. That was on a car, that had damage to EVERY panel, you could see from 100m away the whole car was also twisted, roof bowed etc. Nah, we'll try get out of needing to payout on a $10,000 car... Her sister ended up with major shoulder reconstructive surgery being required, and was permanently limited in her ability to do her job as a nurse after that, as she can't (And was told before surgery too this would be guaranteed to happen) regain full strength in that shoulder. However, there was no choice to not have it, as she could barely use her arm, which was her dominant one, and was in near constant major pain. (And she's the type of person that would try and walk off a broken leg!) NRMA did the biggest run around on the personal injury side too for about 18 months, even to the point of trying to put 100% blame of the accident on Sarah's sister, even though the other driver admitted she didn't look, and didn't stop, and was charged by the police. Sarah used to have a Barina insured with them. It was a policy setup, paid all 12 months in advance. At the end of the 12 months, Sarah was living with me, I reviewed the renewal, it clearly stated "If you do nothing, your policy will cease on XYZ date". We did nothing, as we moved her insurance in with all of mine and I was with Shannons. We find out 10 months later, NRMA decided, because he DAD had a car insurance policy at the same address as what Sarah's mailing address was (Garaged address had been changed), that they'd put Sarah's (What should have been non existent policy) onto her Dad's month to month charges on his credit card. We had to jump through hoops, to get a refund. They didn't care that we actually found the letter that said "If you do nothing, your policy will cease" they made us prove we had NON COMPULSORY insurance else where before they'd issue the refund, and after they agreed to the refund, it still took another 6 weeks and 3 more phone calls for them to actually process it. They also had two insurance claims from storm damage, and they were an absolute cluster to get resolved as well (one vehicle, one house). Some how, up until about 3 years ago, her parents were still loyal to NRMA too, and we were like "How the hell are you so loyal to staying with them, when other places are so much cheaper, and they've f**ked you over every time you've ever had to make a claim?"
    • I got the four AN10 fitting welded up to the cam covers and started up making the head to sump breather/drain lines. The front passenger side cover I used a 45 up top and a 90 at the bottom into the stock VCT head drain spot (3/4" BPST to AN10 adapter) thats unused on the RB25DET NEO with some speedflow flame shield to protect it from the manifolds heat.   back passenger side was a 90 up top with some flame shield and 45 at the sump end. The rear drivers is 45 at both ends   the front drivers fitting is capped off for now but ready to go if i want to try moving the breathers around. I was told by the fabricator to leave all the welds raw for now to make sure there are no pin hole leaks. A lot of cleaning up, re bundling looms and degreasing to go as well as final assembly on the cam cover baffles. The first real test will be 28th March at a Circuit event. added complexity and more spots for leaks but overall looks relatively neat imo
    • Yeah i think the dash needs to come out. To get the loom or maybe just climate control and radio cluster. My mirrors are done i think the motors don’t work so well after flood haha i need the ac fan, you said you wanted to keep it for your 31 and interior loom not including boot. The wiper motor. I’m not sure how good the window surrounds are on the exterior on the pintara.  I will message you to get your bank details shortly 
    • Just another barrier put up to stop cars being modified. When we're all driving Chinese sewing machines, you won't want to modify it anyway, and you'll likely already have slashed your wrists and be locked up in a padded room for your own protection.
×
×
  • Create New...