Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Ive got an engine with a 4 stage dry sump pump and I have a question about oil tank venting.

The engine is fully sealed. From what I understand the 3 scavenge stages (which are 1.75" stages) should be able to pull the crankcase into a vacuum around the -10 to -15 inHG. Of course all this air that is sucked out of the block plus cylinder blow by ends up in the main oil tank and must be vented. I'll be doing this by a remote mounted vent with a couple of filters on it which is the pretty much standard approach.

My question is, can I put a one way pressure relief valve in line between the remote vent and the filters in order to lightly pressurise the tank?

My thoughts behind this is if the tank is lightly pressurised (to about 1 psi) this will assist oil flow to the pressure stage. With 1psi pushing oil to the pressure stage and a low vacuum on the other side of the engines bearings. The reason I want to do this is the length of the hose between the pressure stage and the tank is quite long because the oil tank is in the boot. The hose size I am using is -12. The pump pressure stage is 1.25".

I'd appreciate any thoughts other people with dry sump experience might have about this.

Cheers,

Ian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/300280-dry-sump-tank-question/
Share on other sites

Yes, the boot should be able to hold the oil you are going to blow out of the tank.

But seriously, creating the vacuum in the engine means pressurising the res. tank. If you don't vent it properly, you will not only restrict flow into the tank from the pump but also cause the oil to try to escape the tank. I don't think there are any secrets left in dry sumps so just do what everyone else does.

If your tank is in the boot...I believe you need atleast -16 lines to and from the tank to pump. Anything smaller and it makes it hard for the pump to suck it over that distance.

From memory the peterson guide says -12 for upto 3-4 foot anything greater then its -16.

Ive never heard of anyone doing what you are suggesting....but you can always be the first to try and find out the results first hand.

Edited by r33_racer

Thanks for the info. Im able to run a -16 supply line without too much trouble.

I have a ERL501 thermostat and a pair of oil coolers running on the return line before it returns to the tank. Is there any rule saying that a -12 return line isnt large enough? I figured because its returning to the tank and not under pressure it should be fine right?

Im not 100% sure...We ran -16 on both lines. Something to do with the large amount of air/oil being pushed and pulled through the lines. I think so long as the pump supply line is -16 you will be safe as thats the critical one.

Make sure you do it with a single line too if possible, eliminate the use of multiple lines and fittings, as they can cause problems.

Afraid not, there just isnt a way to get the plumbing through the car now... I should have run pipes through the chassis before the car was 95% assembled. Now all thats left to do with it is wire the ecu and run the oil supply and returns. This is another one of those things i'll put on my list of things to do should I ever scratch build a race car again.

Edited by GTRNUR

I run a -16 return line and a -12 feed to the oil pump with a 3gallon tank in the boot and have no issues with oil pressure. A -12 will be fine for the pressure feed. What sort of pump do you have I run a peterson pump and it has -12 inlet on the pressure side and all the scavage lines and a -16 fitting for the return line and is supplied by peterson in that configuration.

I personally would not try to put any sort of pressure relief valve in the breather line from the tank as you do not want it pressure in the tank at all best bet is just to breath your oil tank into a catch can and then vent this can thru the boot floor so you dont fill the cabbin with fumes/

I should have posted all the details from the start... so here goes.

The tank is mounted at about the same height as the pump, so there is no down hill flow for the oil. Im sure that only helps for priming the pump but has little effect on the pump operation when the engine is running.

The pump is an RPM 4 stage pump. 2 x scavenge stages are 1.75" and use -12 scavenge lines, and the 3rd scavenge stage uses a -10 line. The pressure stage is 1.25" and is all -10 from the pressure side to the engine. From the pump it blows through a remote filter and straight into the engine.

I just spent the evening finishing off the -10 plumbing for the oil coolers to the thermostat. The thermostat return is a -10 hard line.

The return line from the pump to the thermostat is yet to be purchased, but it will be easiest to setup with -12 as that was the fittings that came with the pump.

The supply line has to go through the firewall and has 2 x 90 degree fittings (one off the tank and the other at the firewall), 1 x straight and 1 x 130 degree fitting at the pump end that is a size adapter from -16 hose to -12 fitting at the pump. Based on what everyone is saying I should be keeping the supply a -16, not only because of the length involved but also because of the bends and fittings that will be in the line. I estimate the supply line will be about 4.5 Meters and the return line will be about 5 meters.

I was planning on using a -12 vent line to the catch can. Venting through the floor makes good sense too, thanks for that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...