Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I have a 1990 r32 gtst with the nice rb20det. Now i was searching on the internet to find a nice metal headgasket. There's only one with i don't know and that the bore of the engine. All i can find that is 78,0mm. But all the headgaskets are 80.5mm or 83,5mm. Can anyone tell me which one i need?

Cheers Patrick.

Hey man. Here is some copy pasta from wiki. The URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_RB_engine

Bore and stroke

All Nissan engines follow a naming convention, identifying the engine family (in this case, RB), displacement, and features present- see the list of Nissan engines for detail.

The stock dimensions for the RB engines;

  • RB20 - 2.0 L (1998 cc, bore: 78.0 mm, stroke: 69.7 mm)
  • RB24 - 2.4 L (2428 cc, bore: 86.0 mm, stroke: 69.7 mm)
  • RB25 - 2.5 L (2498 cc, bore: 86.0 mm, stroke: 71.7 mm)
  • RB26 - 2.6 L (2568 cc, bore: 86.0 mm, stroke: 73.7 mm)
  • RB30 - 3.0 L (2962 cc, bore: 86.0 mm, stroke: 86.0 mm)

________________________________________________________________________________

__

Where have you looked to find only those sizes? Im not an RB20 person so don't quote me on anything. Like I said, straight copy pasta from wiki

Edited by Lukas 33

This is what ive found;

The following is intended for hcr32 and hnr32 owner or any car sporting the rb20det.

Vehicle model: hcr32 and hnr32

Engine type: rb20det

Displacement (cc): 1998

Combustion chamber: pent-roof type

Valve arrangement : DOHC belt drive

Bore x stroke mm: 78.0 x 69.7

Compression ratio : 8.5

Compression pressure: (kg / cm2) / (rpm) 12.0 / 300

Maximun output (net) (ps / rpm): 215 / 6400

Maximun torque (net) (kg-m / rpm): 27.0 / 3200

Fuel consumption ratio (g / GS.h) / (rpm): 215 / 2400

Dimensions m/t (l / w / h) (mm): 845x660x685

Dimensions a/t (l / w / h) (mm): 830x660x685

Idle speed (rpm): 800

Ignition timing a/t (BTDCdegrees / rpm): 15 / 650

Ignition timing m/t (BTDCdegrees / rpm): 20 / 650

Firing order: 1-5-3-6-2-4

Valve clearance cold (mm) intake: 0.45 +/- 0.003

Valve clearance cold (mm) exhaust: 0.38 +/- 0.003

Throttle chamber bolts torque setting (kg-m) first stage: 0.9 - 1.1

Throttle chamber bolts torque setting (kg-m) second stage: 1.8 - 2.2

Flywheel run-out limit (mm): 0.10

Con rod nut tightening stage 1 (kg-m): 2.3 - 2.9

Con rod nut tightening stage 2(kg-m): 3.9 - 4.5

That's the same as to above post. Also 78.0mm bore. So waht headgasket do i need than. I would think i need an 78.0mm headgasket but they are not for sale only the 80.5 and 83.5 for a rb20det.

chrs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...