Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Spotted now across from my house - Grey R32 GTST, no wing, 5spoke rims, cannon exhaust, number plates ends in either 77S or 775, can't completely see from here, bad angle.. Also appears to have a rear diffuser as apart of the rear bar.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/514/#findComment-4217424
Share on other sites

Hey Kat, prob not a good idea to post actual parked locations... dodge ppl may read it thats all...

This is right in the middle of Russell in the open visible to about 5 buildings and patrolled by the AFP... Don't think there'd be too much of a worry with this one.

Plus there's about 6 carparks there so take your pick if you feel like going through all of them.

Edited by GTRKat
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/514/#findComment-4218368
Share on other sites

This is right in the middle of Russell in the open visible to about 5 buildings and patrolled by the AFP... Don't think there'd be too much of a worry with this one.

Plus there's about 6 carparks there so take your pick if you feel like going through all of them.

Plenty of thieves do go through them, I wouldn't hold any confidence that the AFP are a deterrent.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/514/#findComment-4218448
Share on other sites

Plenty of thieves do go through them, I wouldn't hold any confidence that the AFP are a deterrent.

This is true - there are certain bad spots. But most of them are pretty safe. Without saying where this spot actually is, if someone got away with stealing something from here not only are they pretty ballsy but they're pretty damn good!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/514/#findComment-4218457
Share on other sites

Saw a nice R32 gtr goign along parkway leaving work at 6, although not quite sure wats the go with the driver, seemed like a bit of a d-head driving home like there was no tomorrow! Pissed alot of ppl off cutting them off and doing lane changes every second or two............just pisses me off when people drive like that, only thinking of themselves and getting home 5 seconds quicker.

Edited by 33Sedan
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/514/#findComment-4227218
Share on other sites

ZCR - followed an auto black 32gts(t?) from fyshwick to glenlock, got a nod n gave a nod

That would have been me on my way home taking the long way home and ... :laugh: enjoying it

Saw your car in the rear view approaching behind looked cool sits very nicely on the road ,

thought ya might have been off here...

it's surprising how many skyline owners are on this forum from around Canberra...

Edited by hr32gts
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/514/#findComment-4229659
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, yeah, look - here's the thing. You always replace the tensioner when you're going in there to replace a belt....under normal circumstances. You want to make sure it is good and safe, and that you don't create a reason to take the front of the bloody motor apart again. But in this case, OP is replacing a belt that has aged out on time, not usage. The belt is a million miles away from aging out on usage. The belt gets a time "limit" merely because it is made of rubber and can degrade naturally. The tensioner? Not so much. I reckon it could last forever on the current usage pattern. So I reckon if the thing is going to continue to get used at the same rate, replacing the tensioner is somewhat gratuitous. Would I replace it if I was doing it on my car right now? Hell yes. Because my car does 10-20 thousand kays a year. So it's all going to be the same thrashedness. Would I YOLO it on OP's car. More than likely.
    • I dunno. I think any one of those from each side to sump is probably enough. Remember - this is about creating a path for gas flow up from the sump to the cam covers. That gas flow then has to leave via the lines to the catch can. There's probably little point in providing 100% more capacity from sump up to covers cf. what you have from there to the catch can. Put in the 3 convenient ones? Any which way that you see fit. That'd be my thoughts.
    • Getting holes drilled into to cam covers and AN10 fitting welded on. My sump has 2x AN10 fittings on it already. These are the options I have come up with that can be done without needing to remove the sump to add more fittings. In all options front of passenger side cover connects to VCT head drain bung (i know this isn't the best spot but my feeling is it must do something). Option 1 (pink). The back of each cam covers gets its own line to sump. Option 2 (blue). The back of each cam covers are linked and share a line to sump. The front of drivers side gets its own line. Option 3 (Black). Drivers side are Tee'd together and share a line to the sump. Passenger side rear gets its one line to the sump.
    • I'd be surprised if Nissan doesn't mention it in the manual as it seems unlikely that a tensioner is going to last 200,000km.
    • Tapin,    So got mine up and realize a few things. First was my slave line doesn’t reach the other side, so I have to get a longer hose made. I want to ask did you have to extend your wires for the CD009 sensors? One on the driver side(right side of car looking at the car from the rear) and one on the passenger side( the left side of car from rear). And do you know what those two sensors are respectively? I know it’s not Speedo since we talked on this already. And I may have to separate the trans again to swap out throw out bearing. We will see. Did you run your RB slave cylinder? I know you cracked your original but replaced it with a nismo. But wasn’t sure if you bought the one designed for the CD009 or not. Thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...