Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Ive got a strange set of problems that i would like some opinions on so i will explain in as much detail as possible.

My FJ20 was tuned over 2 years ago after it was built and it made 395HP at 17psi. A few weeks ago i took it back to the dyno to give it another power pull just to be sure everything was sweet. As i rocked up to the dyno, i put a new set of plugs in it just because it hadn't had plugs for 2 years. Anyway it made 394HP so everything was fine and i was satisfied.

I took it to the drags 2 weeks ago and on the first pass it felt like what was a fuel surge just before the line so i shut off and rolled over.

I was concerned that i had hurt the engine so i did 1 more pass short shifting a little earlier and still did the same MPH, this time without the fuel surge so i figured everything was ok.

Paranoid, i took it back to the dyno to do another pull to make sure everything was all alright. The first run it only made 375HP followed by 370HP on the second pull. Boost was also coming on later by about 500rpm but holding 17psi when it came on. We figured something was wrong so did a comp test straight away on the dyno which came out with all cylinders between 185-190.

Satisfied with that, Next we put a pressure tester on the front of the turbo and pressurised the system, the only thing that we could hear leaking was what was sounding like the inside of the external gate. Strange..

While the plugs were out, we inspected them which showed that 1,2,3 were fairly even, but 4 was very rich. (possible plenum design, see photo below)

Anyway, so we cleaned them and got straight into the power pull.

The first run, boost came on super late, by over 1000rpm and then went on to pull 395HP again, followed by a backup run at 391HP.

I pulled the plugs again and number 4 was definately rich still, but the power was back.

I have no idea why this has all happened and i know its a hell of a story, but if anyone has any ideas i would like to know. The only additional thing i can think of is that it was stalled backing onto the dyno and flooded, and took a while to get it started. Perhaps fouling a plug? but i dont know.

So to recap.

Boost on late - hissing noise in external gate. (turbosmart pro gate 48mm)

Power down but picked up with clean plugs.

1 rich plug - wondering if plenum design isn't very good.

Flooded before initial runs, could the plug have fouled causing lack of power?

Best pics i have of plenum

R6015.jpg

R6024.jpg

R6025.jpg

Thanks for the input,

G

Having seen many many custom plenums - most of them (well, all) taper. Start large, end up smaller.

Yours is just like a long tube.

There will be a reason for it to taper im sure, big companies don't spend big bucks for nothing... what that is though, no idea! :)

yes that plenum design is rubbish. its obvious cyl 4 is not getting as much air flow as the rest of the cyl.

what ecu are you running? you are describing microtech to me =)

btw, how do you keep the ass end together with all that power in a blue bird?

The plenum design i felt worked a lot better when i was making a lot less power, i used to get fairly even plugs then, however, I'm 22 now and built that plenum myself when i was 16, I was learning just how a turbo system works then, so i couldnt even have guessed it would be making 400HP a few years later.

The rear end is a 10 bolt series 3 TRX disc rear with a detroit locker centre and 4:11s. The trailing arms are welded and plated so touch wood, its not too bad so far.

I run a Wolf ECU V4. So definately not the best thing in the world.

Will running that cylinder so rich become a problem? i have been told a resistance check of the leads may show something up as well.

G

yes that plenum design is rubbish. its obvious cyl 4 is not getting as much air flow as the rest of the cyl.

what ecu are you running? you are describing microtech to me =)

btw, how do you keep the ass end together with all that power in a blue bird?

can you get an IR temp gun and check the exhaust runner temps on the dyno (crude but i doubt you have egt in each runner) i would compare 1234 especially 2 and 4 and see what the diff is, you will have to do it mid pull.... not nice or safe leaning in a red hot bay,

I would have a look at the dizzy capa nd leads , maybe #4 is missing. I would have thought #4 cylinder would run lean with that plenum, with the pressure banking up at the back.

Edited by Adriano

nice, that is one damn cool car! i would like to see some pics of it if you don't mind

anthonye at skylinecentral.org

The plenum design i felt worked a lot better when i was making a lot less power, i used to get fairly even plugs then, however, I'm 22 now and built that plenum myself when i was 16, I was learning just how a turbo system works then, so i couldnt even have guessed it would be making 400HP a few years later.

The rear end is a 10 bolt series 3 TRX disc rear with a detroit locker centre and 4:11s. The trailing arms are welded and plated so touch wood, its not too bad so far.

I run a Wolf ECU V4. So definately not the best thing in the world.

Will running that cylinder so rich become a problem? i have been told a resistance check of the leads may show something up as well.

G

hey guys,

Thats not a bad idea with measureing the heat of the runners, have to go back to the dyno though. I might get the injectors checked as if #4 is a bit dodgy, then it may be leaking at idle or something. I thought the plenum would favour cyl 4 however, its curved around feeding the air in there. Also, with a turb like a 3040, it should have enough CFM of air flowing through that plenum to keep up with the cylinder. But im very open to the opinions here because it was only my guess.

I also built myself a pressure tester today to pressurise the inlet system and i've definately got a leak in the gate somewhere. Air is pissing out from between where the valve shaft goes up into the head of the gate. That was only with about 12psi showing on the boost gauge. I'm guessing thats not normal hey?? would that cause a slow spool up?

Im still stumped why it would run 25HP down for 3 runs until i cleaned the plugs and the HP came back...

(thanks guilt-toy, ill flick some pics over!)

G

Edited by Gareth87

I have a bit of a soft spot for blue birds because it was my first road regoed car and a soft spot for FJ's as it was my fist boosted car in a 180b sss :blink:

hey guys,

Thats not a bad idea with measureing the heat of the runners, have to go back to the dyno though. I might get the injectors checked as if #4 is a bit dodgy, then it may be leaking at idle or something. I thought the plenum would favour cyl 4 however, its curved around feeding the air in there. Also, with a turb like a 3040, it should have enough CFM of air flowing through that plenum to keep up with the cylinder. But im very open to the opinions here because it was only my guess.

I also built myself a pressure tester today to pressurise the inlet system and i've definately got a leak in the gate somewhere. Air is pissing out from between where the valve shaft goes up into the head of the gate. That was only with about 12psi showing on the boost gauge. I'm guessing thats not normal hey?? would that cause a slow spool up?

Im still stumped why it would run 25HP down for 3 runs until i cleaned the plugs and the HP came back...

(thanks guilt-toy, ill flick some pics over!)

G

I have a bit of a soft spot for blue birds because it was my first road regoed car and a soft spot for FJ's as it was my fist boosted car in a 180b sss ;)

haha mine too... sies III wagon :blink: cause i was a surfy dude.

Yeah my first RWD/then EFI/then turbocharged car .

I bashed out a long post this morning but lost it to cyber space .

1) Early non intercooled DR30 Skylines had the largest plenum volume OE FJ20 inlet manifold .

2) I used an S12 Gazelle clutch master and a brake master/booster from a JDM Bluebird SSS .

The trick is to separate the rear from the front half of the boosters chamber and turn it 180 deg to offset the whole assembly downwards . Then you can fit a DR30 manifold on an FJ20 in a Bluebird , must also use the OE manifold brace or the mount nuts come lose .

If you must use an Oz spec booster/master pull the booster out and unbolt the aluminium mount off the boosters two rear studs . Rotate it 180 and bolt it back on . Makes them sit lower .

Really better off geting an early MR30 Skyline booster and having it rebuilt with longer rear studs , std too short for a Bluebird but same pattern .

JDM Nabco or Tokiko masters are MUCH better quality and larger bore ie 15/16 than the Oz birds 13/16 Girlock piece of crap .

3) DR30 Skyline front struts bolt into Bluebirds but one of the line fittings is non std onthe hardline side of our Blueys , change it and all falls in .

4) Rear four link and H190 ok for straightline use , resist temptation to use urethan bushes in the rear because the top diagonal links work in different planes to the lower parallel ones .

5) Takes lots of work to get a decent radiator and intercooler into a Bluebird , I used an R32 GTR rad and a pair of DR30 elec fans . Cooler was an early Plasmaman and the bonnet latch was converted to a 1600 Datsun type . Headlight inner mounts were loped off and new ones made .

GTR rad pins sat on sockets welded onto the removable caster rod brackets in rubber bushes . Also lower mounts for the fan shroud went into those brackets . I had a steel pipe made up to transfer water across the bottom because GTR rad and FJ20's are opposites so to speak .

6) Gearboxes , the best of the 71 series boxes was the manual R32 RB20DET ones . You take the FJ type bellhousing and bore its lower bearing tunnel accurately out to suit the RB's larger lower bearing and then fit the RB's front bearing cover/clutch bearing spigot . RB 71 boxes have the wide gears and all big syncros . I know people slot the top bell housing bolt holes on RB bellhousings and flick one of the dowels but that's the bodgey way to do it .

Almost 10 yrs and lots of resources went into my Bluey , it was engineered and legally registered in NSW with TRX910 plates .

I couldn't get 7 for it in the end even with a DR30 IRS R200 LSD rear end/Autronic/Bilsteins etc .

Parted it out and made almost 7 so far in bits . Last I saw the shell was on the back of a truck with the cranes boom through its roof . Such is life .

A .

hahaha!! Mine was series III sedan! Good ole ca20.. man i won some bets about the 8 spark plug thing.. i ended up rebuilding it.. thing had 210psi compression per cyl ! could only use very expensive head gaskets the cheap ones would die straight away ;)

haha mine too... sies III wagon :( cause i was a surfy dude.

A little update, i pressure tested the system again yesterday while i had some time and it wasnt costing shit loads sitting on a dyno.

The external gate is leaking big time out between the shaft and where it goes up into the head of the gate. I rang turbo smart and they said its a worn valve guide leaking boost. I can only assume this is causing my problem of boost coming on slow. They said the 48mm progate which is what i run is outdated and may be hard to repair. Man i was pissed off, its got less than 10ks on it and its not even a track car! bullshit.

Anyway, assuming that when i repair the gate, the boost should come on earlier again, its now down to why did it do 2 runs low on power and why #4 plug is fouling?

Still need to try the above options when i get time. The gate cant be fixed until mid Jan, when they get back from holiday anyway.

G

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey guys, i just had my injectors cleaned about half hour ago and they were pretty much fine. In fact, #2 was pumping out the most fuel. But they were all within a 4% tolerance.

I need to check the lead to that pot now but i think the fuel side is fine.

Would that cylinder running rich cause any problems? if there was enough fuel for it to glaze i would have thought it would show by being down on power or drive poorly or something. Does anyone think it will be a problem to drive?

Also, i had the radiator rebuilt and cleaned which i picked up today. He said it was around 20% blocked. Which isnt much, but maybe enough to creep up the temps at idle.

Anyway, opinions on the injector situation would be great. Or do you still think its the plenum design even though ive had good plugs colours in the past.

G

I just measured the leads then, i think i was using the multimeter correctly, (had it on the 2000k setting)?

Anyway,

#1 - 10

#2 - 13

#3 - 16

#4 - 12

I have no idea what im looking for with leads so any info would be great. As it runs an electronic dizzy, is it worth checking anything there?

Thanks, G

interesting.

have you noticed any extra timing chain rattle on start up?

not meaning to scare you but when mine started playing up it dropped the lower jackshaft chain and f**ked the motor...

might pay to pull the roker cover off and check if the cam timing is ok and the ignition timing is as it should.

have you got a cat converter? check its not melted.

it would have to be a very big leak to reduce power. but.. it has nothin gto do with lag. if anything the oposite, as once the exhaust is leaking past the guide, the gate must be open, ie: on boost, so if anything it will overboost as the boost presure will be leaking past the guide intoducing a airleak in your wastegate plumbing.

thats a gt35? have you checked the turbo shaft play? also are they rx7 injectors? i put them in my fj20. the fuel line i squeezed over the end of them had the inner shieth bunched up on the end of one of the injectors resticting it. and i melted a piston.

with your plenum, not great. you should use the factor turbo one. dr30. use a 180b brake booster. much smaller if thats why you changed it.

also the na plenum is bigger and has slightly smaller runners and will give you better midrange without any loss up top. use a xf falcon throttle body.

Hi To4GTR,

Thanks for your reply, i can answer your questions to me no worries,

There is no extra timing chain rattle, in fact, i get no timing chain rattle at all.

No Cat in it, as engine is pre 85.

The gate was leaking boost pressure, ie, when i pressurised the system by putting a blanked off silicone tube over the comp cover with an air fitting on it and pressurising to 20psi, it was pissing air out of the gate. This is now resolved.

Turbo is fine, has less than 10ks on the turbo and 0 shaft play. The RX7 injectors which are in it, were tested last week. All fine as well.

The next thing is the manifold, i think a standard manifold is most probably better also, but i have had even plugs before with the same manifold. I think however, a custom plenum is next on the agenda.

Would a different heat range plug help?

G

Hi To4GTR,

The gate was leaking boost pressure, ie, when i pressurised the system by putting a blanked off silicone tube over the comp cover with an air fitting on it and pressurising to 20psi, it was pissing air out of the gate. This is now resolved.

Turbo is fine, has less than 10ks on the turbo and 0 shaft play. The RX7 injectors which are in it, were tested last week. All fine as well.

G

Hi Gareth,

I was one of the first Turbosmart reps you spoke to about this. You probably didn't know, but that last guy you spoke to, was Nic, the owner of Turbosmart . I think he was kind enough to give you a free valve guide considering.

This issue was discussed among the tech staff and collectively, we have never come across an issue like this where it was the gate (Leaking or otherwise). The leak in your gate was marginal and technically would improve your power curve.

Can I reiterate what was discussed the other day, which is your AFR is way too rich. We suggest you find another tuner for a second opinion on the AFR values.

What stands as the first glaring issue, was the sheer density of soot in the outlet of the gate. It is running extremely rich on boost and if that gate came off after a power run, it is running too rich across the boost range. The amount of soot would indicate something in the 9.5-10.5 range. Consequently, comparing to your first power run, your plugs will foul up giving you a much weaker ramp up on the next run. This would get even worse if there were no air temp compensation values, allowing it to run richer as the air got hotter and thinned. This is something that would give you those graphs also. Your first, slightly cold, run would have been pretty good but as the car got hot, it got richer and would retard your spool up.

In contrast, you will find quite a few tuners will lean out the lower rev range in certain areas, to improve spool up.

The above is merely opinion and we strongly advise you consult a qualified and well experienced tuner before making any changes.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Troy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
×
×
  • Create New...