Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

My cars been at a workshop for 1 month and 1.5 months on seperate occasions with a clutch problem.

Started life as an os giken R3C clutch, it was slipping so i decided to rebuild it to a twin plate.

The workshop had trouble fitting it but eventually got it.

It was sloppy from the start but wore in, constaintly made grinding noises and eventually ended up being hard to select gears and then creeping and grinding.

Box was dropped again, clutch sent back, clutch rebuilder advised clutch was slipping on the back plate from contaminate. problem caused by gearbox seal leaking or thrust bearing always enguaged because incorrect size of bearing or bearing carrier.

Workshop says gearbox rear seal has been changed and is not leaking. so it must be the bearing or carrier.

They have been in contact with the builder and are unable to properly measure it all using his instructions by phone.

My idea was to find out the specs of the standard R3C clutch, thrust bearing and carrier sizes, subtract the difference to get the correct size of bearing and bearing carrier.

i have been in contact with os giken and have some specs for R3C push type

pressure plate size 12.1mm

Carrier size 26mm (dont know if this is for just the sleeve, or sleeve and bearing??)

Bearing size ?? standard nissan, part number 30502-14601

My rebuilt clutch does have a higher clamping rate. so i thought the springs on the pressure plate might be different so i asked for that to be measured.

I am yet to have the custom clutch measured, just looking for advice on if im measuring the correct items in order to fit it properly once and for all.

If anyone knows the size of the thrust bearing 30502-14601 it would be a help.

Would i need any other different parts like a different fork or pivot ball?

If anyone have any advice it would be greatly appreciated.

im not a mechanic, sorry if the terminology is incorrect, just trying to help grease the wheels so i can get my car back quicker.

I have attached all the info sent to be by os giken.

Rich

post-17363-1261479471_thumb.jpg

090714_3rd_Page_of_Clutch_Installation_Manual.pdf

Page_6_Clutch_Installation_Manual_Eng_0807.pdf

Edited by V-Spec

It shouldn't be such a hassle. Either the clutch hasn't been built properly (if you have taken it to someone who rebuilds clutches for a living and is good at it, then this is less likely) or the mechanics fitting it are not doing something right. You need the shorter carrier with all the OS clutches and the smaller diameter bearing. Not the standard one.

It will also depend on what the guy did when he built it. They can be built to require the standard bearing.

You need to make sure the hydraulics are functioning correctly and make sure the adjustment is correct also.

what he said :P

you need a 14mm carier with the small bearing. (early datsun something, if anyone knows please fill me in)

being a small cover sping diameter youd be best to keep it as os intended. ie r3c fitting kit. about $130 from attomotto, come with carrier and bearing ready to put in

cage and cover?

by cage you mean the springs, and by cover you mean the outside?

Sorry if answering my questions is mundane but when i talk to the people who are fixing my car and taking ages, i wanna know what im talking about

Edited by V-Spec
cage and cover?

by cage you mean the springs, and by cover you mean the outside?

Sorry if answering my questions is mundane but when i talk to the people who matter i wanna know what im talking about

The cage is the part or the clutch that holds the plates. It's usually attached or part of the flywheel. It's like a castle turret.

The cover is the piece that goes on top of the part you have in the photo.

Pretty much everything on the top and outside of the clutch aside from the plates and flywheel

thanks for explaining that

if the clamping pressure has been changed, does that mean the diaphram springs on the cover have been changed? or does it have to do with something else?

will the diaphram springs always be in the same possition? does this mean that there was no need for any different size carrier and bearing?

sorry about my clutch noobness, at least im learning

thanks for explaining that

if the clamping pressure has been changed, does that mean the diaphram springs on the cover have been changed? or does it have to do with something else?

will the diaphram springs always be in the same possition? does this mean that there was no need for any different size carrier and bearing?

sorry about my clutch noobness, at least im learning

The spring is usually retained when converting these. It will pretty much go back to within 1mm or so of where it did with the original setup.

The carrier needs to be the short version, though, and the bearing needs to be the small diameter one, not the standard one.

If you want straight advice on the topic, ring NPC clutches when they come back in January. He does the conversions so can tell you all the ins and outs. There number is 07 3277 9403

  • 2 weeks later...

the usual things to go wrong here is the bearing, carrier height, and clutch height.

bearing and carrier - mechanic probably used the wrong ones and also overlubed it.

clutch height - rebuilder probably machined off a few mil off the basket/cage since you've removed 2 discs.

after a quick read of the thread it sounds like the bearing is the wrong one and the carrier is too short. post a few pics of the bearing and the clutch in pieces, that'll help more.

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE

Clutch builder tells me only the internals of the clutch were modified, no cage or cover changes, all internal. this means that the standard os r3c bearing and carrier should fit. Clutch builder has avdised he doesnt know what carrier it came with adn the only way to be sure is to measure it all.

Workshop tells me standard r3c bearing and carrier doesnt work as theyve already tried it and they tell me they cant understand how the clutch builder wants to measure up everything.

The way i see it they got it working and driveable once, but not properly, It failed and the builder has told them whats wrong so it must be possible to get working properly. I have told the workshop to give it one last try, to speak to the builder, measure and install or its going to someone else.

Its hard for me to reverse what was done to the clutch and to be honest i trust the clutch builder. Can anyone recomend me the best in the field of clutches in Melbourne, dont mind if its a person or a workshop, my brother has a hoist and a factory.

the saga continues.

  • 3 weeks later...

UPDATE

My wokshop spent a long time measureing and discussing how to install this clutch correctly. Both parties were happy with happy with how was done.

After getting the car back it was driving the best it ever had.

Drove 300km and the clutch started slipping very very badly, couldnt change gears, had to start the car in gear to drive it anywhere.

My workshop seems to think there is a design fault with this clutch. Asked them the simple questions, seals, free play in the fork so bearing isnt always getting driven. Seem to have oovered it all.

Workshop is taking out everything, flywheel, bolts, clitch, bearing, carrier, fork, slave and sending it to clutch builder.

Both parties have been honest through this but its back to square one and i havnt had the car for a good part of 4 months.

will update

Edited by V-Spec

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
    • Hello. I have an a31 cefiro but since I am in Turkey we have a CA20S engine. I did some research. Then I found that I can swap with a ca18 but when I heard that it has the similar substructure as the s13. I thought I can swap with an sr20 because the sr20 was used with the s13. So can I easily swap the sr20 on my cefiro or is it difficult? 
×
×
  • Create New...