Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

got my car back from gtech performance on thurseday, car is tuned on e85 fuel running a vipec ecu the car made 317.1 rwkw

they did get it to 328rwkw but wasnt very safe as there was a missfire anything over that and also injectors are at 85%.

good this is when u pop the bonnet you can hardly tell anything is done to it, apart from the big ass 50mm pro gate :D

car is not complete yet but safe to drive on this power level, will be going back there in February when they open up agian for bigger injectors, different ignition setup and another tune

lets see how she goes.

i will be putting standard supsension in the car soon enough, a set of slicks and taking it down the strip for some 1/4mile action.

heres a pik from there christmas party the other day, and also have just a sample video of the car (nothing major just a bit of up and down the street screaming)

D34DLYatgtech.jpg

ps. the r33 rims are only on the back as the 18s had wires hanging out and wasnt suitable for the dyno.

Edited by WARLORD BAS
  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

for the fuel setup i have 2 x bosch 044 fuel pumps, surge tank, 800cc injectors (or there abouts), surge tank, braided fuel lines in the boot, new fuel lines from boot to fuel rail, new fuel rail, vipec ecu, garrett gt3540, catch can setup,

and thats the basis really

e85 is only available at the hoppers crossing petrol station on old geelong road, pump number 10.

car is all over the road, but i cant even drive it really as i dont get my license back until 05/05

Ah nice work, I am thinking of upgrading to a surge tank, and considering replacing lines while im there, and mayb try e85 on a new tune. Do you need special ethanol injectors or pumps for e85? Or just a higher flowing system?

in regards to whether you need special injectors, im not sure, but as u can see i have 2 bosch 044 fuel pumps which u can get most places.

the thing to remember though is that e85 burn ALOT quicker.

not sure exactly, as i got it done as a packege mate.

nytsky - i know that e85 needs a much higher cc injector and there dyno is quiet a low reading dyno, but as i said its not complete 100% so everything will be sorted out in 6 weeks,

and as they say, a dyno should only be a tuning tool so im hanging to take out to calder/heathcote and see what mph/et i can get.

feels absolutely mental :D, couldnt be happier.

GT35 only made 320rwkw on E85? How much boost is being used?

I ask because you can virtually do that on PULP, with a 3076!

Regardless of the fact it is a low reading dyno - cause lets face it - every 2nd post says the dyno they used reads low these days.

Indeed take it to the track, i would imagine the MPH will match 320rwkw. However it should be 400++

Ah nice work, I am thinking of upgrading to a surge tank, and considering replacing lines while im there, and mayb try e85 on a new tune. Do you need special ethanol injectors or pumps for e85? Or just a higher flowing system?

you definately dont need to upgrade lines.

Seen plenty of cars make 450rwkw+ on factory Nissan lines. More about the fuel pump being decent :D

r31 nismoid, as i said, its having missfire issues and the tuning is not finished, also as i said dyno dont mean anything, its about the mph thats what im waiting for

the turbo is a gt3540 with the .64 rear and on 18psi boost

i run 323 rwkw on e85 on virtually the same boost and a smaller turbo...

as for fuel, 2 x 044's and a surge tank are not req'd (nice to have tho)

i run nismo 555 injectors, a nismo drop in fuel pump and stock fpr, lines, rail etc

What did the Vipec ECU set you back?

Vi-PEC plug-in ecu is $1881 inc GST

As a side note...

we put some new Injector Dynamics 1000cc jobbies in a completely standard car the other day...the Vi-PEC controlled them beautifully. At idle the AFR's didn't jump around at all, i reckon we could have put 2000cc ID injectors in and it would have been just as good. These new injectors we are getting out of the States are the latest technology and when driven by the Vi-PEC are very impressive indeed.

Edited by DiRTgarage
GT35 only made 320rwkw on E85? How much boost is being used?

I ask because you can virtually do that on PULP, with a 3076!

Regardless of the fact it is a low reading dyno - cause lets face it - every 2nd post says the dyno they used reads low these days.

Indeed take it to the track, i would imagine the MPH will match 320rwkw. However it should be 400++

i run 323 rwkw on e85 on virtually the same boost and a smaller turbo...

as for fuel, 2 x 044's and a surge tank are not req'd (nice to have tho)

i run nismo 555 injectors, a nismo drop in fuel pump and stock fpr, lines, rail etc

You might want to think about reading the post again, Bas stated the car IS NOT COMPLETE, 317kw is the current tune as they had injector issues, as for 400++ wow, stock bottom end, no worries :)

Did you read? There were no injector issues at all. 85% duty is not a worry... read on and you shall see why...

Now further detail is provided... a GT35 in .63 is pretty much at the limit @ 330rwkw miss firing aside. You'll also probably find the miss firing could also be induced by .63 rear.

It is horribly restrictive for that compressor.

There should not be issues with fuel because of the following...

1. 800cc/E85 is more than enough for 370rwkw+

2. Two Bosch 044's with E85 will support 400rwkw+

Given the above... You'll never reach those limits with a GT35/.63, so all is well and good. Leaves one issue. Miss firing.

Would likely be coil packs and/or plug choice, but i wouldn't be surprised as i said above, if it was indeed the rear housing choice playing a factor.

ALL ISSUES ASIDE, here is a little clip of what the car sounds like.

as i said, im extremelly happy with how it has turned out and cannot wait till its finished, so we will see what happens once i take it to calder.

Edited by WARLORD BAS
Did you read? There were no injector issues at all. 85% duty is not a worry... read on and you shall see why...

Now further detail is provided... a GT35 in .63 is pretty much at the limit @ 330rwkw miss firing aside. You'll also probably find the miss firing could also be induced by .63 rear.

It is horribly restrictive for that compressor.

Thats intersesting i would have thought that turbo be good for 380+ on E85 considering my little HKS 3037 .68 has seen 350 on numerous dyno's.

What mods are used to make this power? Have you done anything special to be able to run e85?

And where abouts do you you get e85 in melb from? Last I hered there were only 2 servos selling it.

The other servo that has e85 is fueltown(heading towards the city) next to southland on nepean hwy. Look for the big banner cant miss it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...