Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Ive been investigating where to put an oil cooler on my R34 GTR and it seems there arent a lot of options. Ive investigated the Nismo kit (nengun) (http://www.nengun.com/nismo/oil-cooler-kit). Not ont is it bloody expensive, it also requires a Nismo bumper. Ive yet to get the price on that but based on the fact the 400R bars for the R33 are about $4500 delivered I think I'll pass because all up thats close on $7k just to get a well designed oil cooler arrangement!

I want to keep the car either all genuine R34 GTR parts or Nismo where possible. IE: No non sub-standard quality parts. It seems the other kits (greddy/hks/etc) all seem to put the oil cooler in front of the radiator and behind the aircon evaporator. Not exactly ideal placement.

The only other place ive found that seems like a good place is behind the gril in front of the aircon evaporator where the horns are. I think it was the 400R N1's that ran an oil cooler in there, or it might have been the Mines R33... I cant remember I figure I can move the horns further apart and then put a 15"x3"x3" oil cooler in there. There will be room to run -10 oil lines out of there pretty easly too.

So does anyone elase have any suggestions, pictures appreciated.

Cheers,

Ian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/301597-r34-gtr-oil-cooler-placement/
Share on other sites

Why not just get a Trust or HKS kit for the passenger side like almost everybody else uses?

Thermostat avail, direct fitment, quality gear, decent price.

If you want to stay Nissan/NISMO you'll be spending big dollars

I thought both the hks and trust kits put the cooler in front of the radiator? So there is a Trust kit that puts the cooler in the front bar passenger side?

Do they come with a decent mount for the cooler or is it something you have to fabricate yourself? The only kits ive seen were the cooler, hoses and filter adapter.

You do realise that you can make new lines to the cooler core???

If your worried about placement, purchase a brand name kit, then make new lines and a bracket to suit your preffered placement. Or purchase a pwr radiator with an internal oil cooler and make lines to suit from a sandwich plate.

The problem is placement of the cooler, not running lines to it. If the cooler were put inside the front bar, passenger side, it will only get airflow from the small gril covered hole that is in the front bar.

The Nismo setup has a duct next to the indicator that ducts air to it, and the cooler itself is shrouded in so the air has to go through the core instead of being able to flow around it uselessly.

I do like the idea of the heat exchanger in the radiator core, but have already got a PWR radiator in the car. I should have had PWR but an oil cooler in it when they made the core but neglected to do that.

Now that I think about it a bit more, I think it was ARC that made an oil cooler that goes in the horn gril area. I still cant find any good pictures of it though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...