Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not all VG30 turbos are plain bush.

I had 2 VG30 Ball Bearing turbo's. They have a huge exhaust a/r, and a smaller compressor than the RB25 turbo. In turn they are laggy (4000rpm 11psi on a RB20DET)

I had bad luck with the 2 second hand turbo's I got. First one that was sitting in the crate got a little bit of moisture on the bearings and developed a small rust spot that caused the bearings to wirr on idle and when on boost obviously. The second turbo (replacement for the dud) had excessive shaft play that scraped on the housing ever so slightly causing a loud screeching noise when on boost.

So I got my moneyz back.

Don't get a VG30 turbo. Go for a 2530 or a RB25 turbo.

The VG30 turbo is around $500. The 2530 is up over 1.5k.

if you have the money to get the 2530 - dont waste your time making a decision. just go buy it.

I have a HKS2530 on my RB20 and it is awesome! on a stock ecu it was making 207rwkw at (0.8bar) 12psi. the only thing stopping me from running more boost was maxing out the AFM signal. From what ive heard they are very impressive between 1.2bar to 1.5bar. once my ecu has been tuned ill run 1.2 and let you know, but judging on its performance so far it should be good.

do a search on the forum of both turbos, i found the info very useful when i was making the same decision as you. just remember you will have to get all the oil and water lines to fit the HKS turbo. but well worth it, and most of the ones sold on this forum are comming with lines for RB20/25.

The extra lag you get from the vg30 exhaust a/r with the rb25 compressor wouldn't be work the extra 10 or so rwkw extra up top end. The car, I think would end up being slower and less responsive, stick to the RB25 turbo or the HKS2530 for a good streetable RB20DET.

Stick with stock sized exhaust a/r until you start getting over 450hp at the motor (250rwkw). Even nudging up towards 300rwkw it is debatable if the larger exhaust a/r improves the cars overall acceleration.

If I had a 2530 i wouldn't think twice about getting it tuned at 1.4bar. Providing it still makes more overall power than the lower 1.2bar. But it comes down to if you can trust your tuner to tune safe enough so that you won't crack ring lands like so many noob and not so noob tuners have done in the past.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Nah no bearings, just slip fit.  Would be a reasonably challenging but not impossible job to modify it to run bearings but I'm hoping that's not necessary as I may have well built one myself if I end up spending hours modifying it!
    • Brumbys with good shells are bloody expensive, I've looked at 2 "cheaper" cars, and walked away from both,  plus after some research spare parts are fairly sparce I'm starting to think that I missed the boat on finding a clean one that is straight (ish) and without alot rust I'm starting to think about a old Hilux as panels and other parts are much more available as they sold tens of thousands of them I use to be indecisive but now I'm not sure
    • A Brumby would probably fit a big metal toolbox in the back... this is how it begins  
    • Picked up a new OEM boot seal for the MX5 today as the old one got ripped a bit by me being a idiot by seeing if I could fit a large metal tool box in it, it didn't fit, and ripped the seal with the corner of the tool box I am still waiting on time to get the cams and new balancer installed, as well as the repairs to the boot Time will not be an issue soon though
    • I was more thinking so it doesn't flop around as much rather than for rotating it. Once you have the balance right, it should rotate well enough, depending on how much resistance there is on the pivot. I think you said the pivot point was on a bearing though didn't you?
×
×
  • Create New...