Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am new to this forum and new to the world of Nissan's.

I am considering buying/importing either an R32 GTR or R33 GTR and was hoping to get some suggestions on the pro's and con's of each model as I have never driven either model.

It seems to me that the R32 is great value for money, i.e. you can pick up a car with quite a few mod's already done for around the 28-33k mark. However they do not look as comfortable interior wise?

The R33 seems to have a little more space and have a more comfortable interior however for the same price range you can pick up a pretty much stock car with maybe a couple minor mod's.

Any thoughts or guidance would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Deziner

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/301801-opinions-r32-gtr-or-r33-gtr/
Share on other sites

im inpartial to the 33. but also they are 5 years younger than the 32 . and have the better oil pump drive . and that the 33 was about 30 seconds faster around the nuremberg ring . first production car to crack 8 minutes . the 33 is roomier as the wheel base is 104 (or140) mm longer . and it weighs about 100 pound more than the 32

I love both, and was looking for a 97/98 Series 3 R33 when i stumbled across the 32 N1. Being an N1 it was a no brainer and i went with the 32.

Personally, I think the 33's look "classier" and a nice late model one with minimal mods looks stunning.

If your going to mod/rebuild engines, or buy one rebuilt then it should come down to simply what shape you like better. If you're going to keep it close to stock, a late model 33 can be almost 10 years newer than an early 32, so i would go the 33.

To sum up, I am of no help as i would take either one :-)

Hi all,

I am new to this forum and new to the world of Nissan's.

I am considering buying/importing either an R32 GTR or R33 GTR and was hoping to get some suggestions on the pro's and con's of each model as I have never driven either model.

It seems to me that the R32 is great value for money, i.e. you can pick up a car with quite a few mod's already done for around the 28-33k mark. However they do not look as comfortable interior wise?

The R33 seems to have a little more space and have a more comfortable interior however for the same price range you can pick up a pretty much stock car with maybe a couple minor mod's.

Any thoughts or guidance would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Deziner

I know this is not the same but maybe worth looking at. He got the 33GTR at the end of the day.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...tt-t297580.html

Weigh your options and objection for the selection. Most people that have age as a concern will more than likely to get the 33 instead of 32. But having said that, when a good 32 comes up, dont let it go because of that. I would have gotten a series 3 GTR for the money I've got but saw this 1995 N1 which was too hard to refuse.

If you have huge plans and dont mind picking up other's mod, 32 does seem to be a good buy nowadays. With forged internals, mod transmission etc, they'll be more reliable than your stock 33s. But then again, the downside is still the interior (because you've mention it which means you mind).

Hi jaxt,

Yeah still have the Foz.

Will be upgrading the brakes on it soon, slotted & drilled rotors and decent pads (EBC Greenstuff) and then a tune I think.

Foz will be the family car and the GT-R my toy!! LOL

Think I need to do more reseach and actually get out and look at a couple to see what I like/dislike about each model.

sweet..foz sounding good.

brakes were pathetic on my XT but still wish i had kept mine and modded it more

just had green stuffs like yours and some ENKEI's ....oh well never mind it paid for my GTR and the patrol :(

plenty of info here too to help u make your decisions.....

enjoy

I was going to trade the XT in or swap to a GTR but its a great family car as it fits all of us in (me, wife, kid x1 and another on the way). So I'll keep it and buy another car.

My XT currently has: 3" XForce TBE, Hypertech CAI, MY05 STi TMIC, Alloy Y-Pipe, BOV and Samco silicon bits, 18 x 8 APEC Iniri Comp wheels, Pedders Sports Rider suspension, 22mm Whiteline RSB and Front strut brace.

+1 for keeping the Foz as well as acquiring the R33 GT-R for your garage.

I'd tend to budget for upgrading your GT-R than the Foz tho'; (despite the fact that putting new propellors/dump pipe on the Foz is a much easier task).

I'd be patient to find the right one - and then pounce!

I would say the R32... no offence to the R33 owners but i see R33's all the time on the road here in Newcastle (GTR or not), and would rather something not as common

Plus the lines of the R32 is beautiful :D

In the end its your choice, R33 GTR is newer suppose

My other option is to wait about a year and buy an R34 GTR which is ultimately what I really want.

I am starting to lean towards this option rather than "settle" because I am in a rush.

Also, those of you who have owned a Foz/Rex etc. how would you compare the AWD or them compared to the GTR's? I love the way the AWD puts power down and handles and have never driven a GTR so was just wondering how they compare?

You seem to have researched your XT upgrades really well. I presume you used the HD linkages with your W'line RSB?

Personally, I find that I can brake later and apply power earlier with the GT-R than the Subie > greater corner speed.

I like the way the predictability of how the GT-R handles is superb as the torque split engages AWD from RWD thru the twisties.

The Subie to me in a cornering maneouvre can tend to understeer at first with a noticeable weight shift mid-corner. Increasing front tyre pressure reduces this somewhat. I like the way the torque comes in low as one accelerates out of the corner tho' and can come out of a hairpin a bit better. The GT-R has just so much more balanced, sustained power through other types of curves (as you'll see for yourself).

If you can save up for the R34 GT-R then do it!

iv owned both, went from 32 to 33 and back to 32 gtr

the 33 feels big when driving and wasnt as nimble or as fun to drive as the 32

atessa system works a bit quicker in the 33 but who dosnt like a bit of sideways action

plus r32 gtr is the real godzilla

My other option is to wait about a year and buy an R34 GTR which is ultimately what I really want.

I am starting to lean towards this option rather than "settle" because I am in a rush.

Also, those of you who have owned a Foz/Rex etc. how would you compare the AWD or them compared to the GTR's? I love the way the AWD puts power down and handles and have never driven a GTR so was just wondering how they compare?

well if that's the case I would wait too and terry couldn't have explained any better with the comparo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ah right. Maybe my rb just loves chewing through batteries lol.
    • On the R34 can't you just unplug the IACV? This is the way I've always done it on the R33. Disconnect IACV, get it idling around 650rpm, and then do a power reset on the ECU to get it to relearn idle (factory ECU).   The big reason no one has touched on as to why you'd want to get the base idle right, is that it means the computer needs to make smaller adjustments to get a good idle at 700-750rpm.   Also, cleaning the IACV won't normally make the car suddenly idle lower or higher. The main issue with the IACV gumming up is that the valve sticks. This means the inputs the ECU gives, aren't translating to changes in air flow. This can cause idle choppy ness as the ECU is now needing to give a lot of input to get movement, but then it moves too far, and then has to do the same in reverse, and it can mean the ECU can't catch stalls quickly either.
    • 12.8 for a great condition, fully charged battery. If the battery will only ever properly charge to about 12.2V, the battery is well worn, and will be dead soon. When I say properly charge, I mean disconnect it from the car, charge it to its max, and then put your multimeter on it, and see what it reads about an hour later. Dieing batteries will hold a higher "surface charge", but the minutest load, even from just a multimeter (which in the scheme of things is considered totally irrelevant, especially at this level) will be enough over an hour to make the surface charge disappear.   I spend wayyy too much time analysing battery voltages for customers when they whinge that our equipment (telematics device) is causing their battery to drain all the time. Nearly every case I can call it within about 2 months of when the battery will be completely dead. Our bigger customers don't even debate it with me any more ha ha ha. A battery at 12.4 to 12.6 I'd still be happy enough with. However, there's a lot of things that can cause a parasitic draw in a car, first of which is alarms and immobilisers. To start checking, put your multimeter into amps, (and then connect it properly) and measure your power draw with everything off. Typical car battery is about 40aH. Realistically, you'll get about half this before the car won't start. So a 100mA power drain will see you pretty much near unstartable in 8 days.
    • Car should sit at 12.2 or more, maybe 12.6 or 12.7 when fully charged and happy. If there is a decent enough parasitic load then it will certainly go lower than 12.2 with time. You can't beat physics.
    • Ok guess I can rule out the battery, probably even the starter and alternator (maybe) as well. I'm gonna clean those leads and see what happens if it's still shit I might take it to an auto electrician. Unless the immobiliser is that f**king heavy, but it shouldn't be.  If I start the car every day, starts up perfectly never an issue. Isn't 12v low, shouldn't it be around 12.5v?
×
×
  • Create New...