Jump to content
SAU Community

Next Project? E36 M3, E46 M3, R34 Gtr?


glaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

I agree with the M3 sound. Sounds....whooshy. I prefer Hondas or the NSX by comparison.

I do love the M3 though, great performance for an NA combined with the usual BMW luxury with plenty of space. Not sure if you can get a convertible here in Australia but there are quite a few in UK (and going at good prices too). Personally if I were to spend that much I would go for the AMGs from Mercedes specifically the E55. 1/4 mile in under 13 seconds that thing hauls.

To add, I am very impressed with the Skyline 370GT, its a gorgeous looking car :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_49C4S3hdlI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi.

I got a e46 M3 aswell as a couple of GTR's and to be totally honest with you the Gtr's shit on the M3.

Mines a 2005 6 speed coupe and i've been whipped by a few Wrx's lol.

Mine has a Remus exhaust, extractors, Mspeed ecu and CAI.

Defiantly slower than my stock R33 GTR. Abit more responsive than the Gtr's but they run out of puff after 100km/h or so.

I own several cars and time after time i end up going back to my R32 GTR. Best car i've owned in my opinion.

So an unbiased opinion.. go the R34 GTR if you must or just stick to your R33. There really not that expensive to mod if you look around and do it right mods first time you can basically get 300kw with just a few mods unopened.

What area are you in?? Wouldn't mind giving you a test drive of my M3.

I'm selling the M3 for $55k but i reckon don't bother, Their just a boulivard/cruiser car and overrated in my opinion.

Interesting about your comparison Candy33...

The specs in writing of the E46 M3 look to be inline ball with the R33 GTR.

Stock for stock that is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think candy33 nailed it,

He owns both and summed up the M3 as a boulivard/cruiser... thats all it is really. dont get me wrong I think the E46 is awesome - it will just leave you with blue balls if you know what I mean after having all the years of GTR ownership!

Go the 34 GTR and you'll never look back - best piece of car I've ever driven.

we must be into the dollars now so thats my $4.25c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$4.25, the best value I could get:)

All your info is most helpful and with a budget it is looking more and more like keeping my R33 and focus on doing some minor work to that to get 250-275AWKW is the best value.

But as I said, I am test driving a few different vechiles over the next few weeks and am starting to look at a lot of different models so I can make a thorough decision.

Cheers All!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just thought I would let you know I test drove a 2005 HSV Clubsport in 6sp manual and was quite disappointed. Loved the sound but when I put my foot down was a little sluggish.

On the other hand, I test drove the new Golf GTI and I was super impressed, so great little torque early on in rev range and a great looking interior!!

Very Impressed:)

Has thrown a few spanners in the works that for sure as I never thought of an Golf GTI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting about your comparison Candy33...

The specs in writing of the E46 M3 look to be inline ball with the R33 GTR.

Stock for stock that is...

I'm not sure of the specs for a M3, but all i can tell you is they lack the torque and top end rush of a GTR. Their two different type of cars aimed at different people. The power delivery of a M3 is more like a Vtec than anything else,but sounds worse in my opinion.. the exhaust note reminds me of a handfull of marbles getting shaked in a Milo tin. :P

Each to their own i guess, but not my cup of tea. M3 is a car for an executive/businessman and doesn't deliver great performance in the real world, much like alot of other cars out there. Trust me if you drive one you'll know what i mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks candy, I didnt think of these as I thought they might be out of my price range.

I drove a beautiful E36 M3 tonight that has been meticulously looked after with some nice mods, Exhaust-PowerChip-Suspension and has low kms and immaculate condition.

I think my GTR is going up For Sale while this baby is still available!!

Very impressed!!!!!

Who wants an immaculate R33 GTR?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as i love the GTR 34 i'd pick e46 M3 for my daily, the reason are simple,it doesn't attract cops as much as the GTR, it looks nice, it has nice interior and cool gadget, and for 3.2 litre N/A it has decent power for daily driving. CAI,ECU flashed and exhaust will do the job i reckon and besides you don't really need 1000 HP car for your daily. anyway for that price range there are other options such as merc AMGs or Audi's RS/S. if you want more torque go AMG, the new AMG with 6.3l V8 is just crazy in the straight line. but each to their own i guess.

Edited by EKSMUD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure of the specs for a M3, but all i can tell you is they lack the torque and top end rush of a GTR. Their two different type of cars aimed at different people. The power delivery of a M3 is more like a Vtec than anything else,but sounds worse in my opinion.. the exhaust note reminds me of a handfull of marbles getting shaked in a Milo tin. :thumbsup:

Each to their own i guess, but not my cup of tea. M3 is a car for an executive/businessman and doesn't deliver great performance in the real world, much like alot of other cars out there. Trust me if you drive one you'll know what i mean.

I see.

Yeah your right, 2 different type of cars.

Good thing is, you have both cars and can say what the difference is :thumbsup:

One day, you might have to take me for a spin in the M3 E46. :( Haha!

Glaze.

Have you considered the new Evo X MR?

I drove my mates one and was rather impressed and the interior is one of the best ive seen from a japanese car.

Just a thought.

EVO X would make a good daily.

Just the light mods, like exhaust and high flow panel filter, it be perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
    • For that influx of Spammers we had I made no pic posting and no PM's for first ten posts. This is group based and I've manually updated @Beanie to the Members group which will open up the images and PM's. 
    • Thx for the reassuring reply. I’ve got above legal clearance  going in for roadworthy Friday… fingers crossed it’s keeping me awake  bloody nanny state 
    • I was actually going to try and dig out a datalog with turbine speed and EMAP haha
    • Wait until @Lithium posts a compressor map and tries to explain what's going on. There is a strong possibility that the OP lives in a digital world and is not comfortable with analogue machines. A turbo is just about as analogue as it gets, with plenty of non-linear behaviours added in on top. Most of us who think we know how they work are actually only getting by on 2nd and 3rd order mental models that abstract away from the actual physics and bring it back to the sort of kindergarten level concepts we can hold in our heads. This is important when you need to hold 10 such concepts in your head at the same time. You need to reduce the complexity of the individual concepts to allow them to be simultaneously held and manipulated. Too much complexity in the base models makes it very difficult to make them work with each other mentally.
×
×
  • Create New...