Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi!, i am installing a gt3076r on my rb25det (hks low mount manifold) but the turbo that was installed is oil cooled only (turbo was upgraded to diesel turbo and ran out of puff) and the standard water feed line is not on the motor!!!!!! :P so need to know where the most affective and easy to reach location for the water feed to come from is? and is the return location the blanked off bolt at the back of the motor below the manifold on the same side as the oil feed line? i have heard i can "t" into the top heater hose to feed the turbo and think this sound a bit house your father!!! :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302055-where-to-get-water-feed-from/
Share on other sites

or remove the aac and move around the wiring harness there abit and you should see it, will be a bit of a F#@k around to get it on but if you cant be bothred taken the rocker off can be done

ok well when i get back home ill remove the rocker cover and have a look see, and is hard to get a speed flow fitting into this outlet? also i know this is annoying cause im sure this question has been asked many times befor but what size and thread type are all the outlets?(block only) Oil feed? oil drain? water feed? water return? :D byt the way thanks for the fast response it has made the battle i face a lote easyer :woot:

I actually like the way Nissan did the RB26's with the water return into the engines top water outlet . This ensures that any coolant boiling in the turbo/s water jackets after shut down returns steam bubbles to the radiator and preferably the overflow bottle . The RB25 looks like it returns water/steam etc via plumbing around the back of the head and into the inlet manifolds water log - then through the water outlet to the radiator .

If you did it RB26 style on an RB25 it would mean tapping into the inlet manifolds cast in water outlet - which is removable on an RB26 . It also means running a water line around the front of the engine either behind that front plate

or simply around the front of the belt cover - secured properly BTW .

I stay away from bling alloy fittings because they are expensive and not available everywhere . I use the simplest brass barbed fittings I can find with usually fuel hose , EFI hose is very hardy , and clamp it on with Wormald screw clamps . It doesn't look racer like but fittings/hose/clamps easy and cheap to get at short notice .

Also Import Wreckers will sometimes sell you good second hand OE turbo water lines and and banjo bolts which is a godsend for connecting to the turbo itself . They usually have banjo fittings and enough length of hard line to get you far enough away from the turbos heat to clamp a hose and not have it fry . From memory Garrett small frame , up to GT3582R and T04Z , BB turbos use 14mm banjo bolts and these are common to some Nissans .

The RB's standard turbo uses large banjos and bolts and not sure but these may have been the same as the water cooled T3's like say a VL Turbo has std . A lot of those "Hi Flowed" T3/T4 "hybrids" use that water cooled bearing housing and these banjo fittings . Again not sure but 18mm thread springs to mind for some reason . Check anyway .

I reckon you'd probably source a block water fitting the same way . Naturally make sure these bits are not rusted out and likely to fail . Also check that block water fitting because some Nissans used smaller ones - possibly 12mm , don't know what RB25's have .

I'd have to look at an RB engine , isn't the water supply for the turbo towards the rear of the block low down ? From memory there is a banjo fitting and steel hard line to the turbo itself .

My theory has always been find water from as low on the block as you can get , drain bung hole etc , Water would be coolest here .

Return water as high as you can get on the engine which is usually its top water outlet .

Always try to run water lines uphill to the turbo and again to the cooling systems high point . This way the coolant will thermosyphon at shut down and any steam bubbles return to the radiator - not the cylinder heads water jacket .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
.

If you did it RB26 style on an RB25 it would mean tapping into the inlet manifolds cast in water outlet - which is removable on an RB26 . It also means running a water line around the front of the engine either behind that front plate

or simply around the front of the belt cover - secured properly BTW .

Something like this?

post-19642-1262393214_thumb.jpg

post-19642-1262393293_thumb.jpg

Bear in mind getting everything fastened to avoid fatiguing the water pipe takes a bit of work.

.

I stay away from bling alloy fittings because they are expensive and not available everywhere . I use the simplest brass barbed fittings I can find with usually fuel hose , EFI hose is very hardy , and clamp it on with Wormald screw clamps . It doesn't look racer like but fittings/hose/clamps easy and cheap to get at short notice .

Brass fittings and high quality hose does not cost the earth, and can still look - and do - the goods provided bling isn't the aim. :P

post-19642-1262393642_thumb.jpg

post-19642-1262393044_thumb.jpg

post-19642-1262393569_thumb.jpg

If you go here:

http://www.chriswilson.tv/RB25_build/RB25_build.html

my RB25DET spare engine build is shown, it has an HKS low mount turbo on it and the coolant and oil lines are detailed well.

thanks for the pic's and information as to where to pic up the water return and feed. it has made life easy as now i know where to look, and i had the system flow the wrong way in my head i thought water flowed top to bottom not bottom to top, and i have wanted to know what the limit is of the gt3076r with the 0.82r housing, as this is being bolted to a motor that had everything done to it, as i stated befor the turbo installed first off ran out of puff at 350rwhp! (big let down!!!!!!!) so this turbo i hope will see me to the magic 500rwhp!!!!!! i hope!

Hate to burst your bubble but a 3076R 0.82 will not get you 500rwhp...

dam it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :P now ill be doing things like water methanol injection to try and reach that goal! :)

I think you'd need the largest or 1.06 A/R turbine housing to get anywhere near 500 RWHP . Like I keep saying the exhaust gas flow goes up a sizeable amount between the 0.82 and the 1.06 GT30 turbine housings , more so than between the 0.63 and the 0.82 ones .

Yes you would get a certain amount of turbine lag with that 1.06 housing but you are asking for more than double the factory 240 odd CHP and at the wheels now .

Have a look at ATP's website , there is mention of a 1.06 A/R twin scroll turbine housing profiled for (from memory) GT3582R's and GT3076R's .

Almost sure to have a twin entry T4 International flange so maybe not much use to you .

Some won't agree but in my opinion you're going to need some fairly serious gas paths to make something like 220 WHP per litre engine size .

I dunno where you go from here but either an RB30 or at least an RB26 headed engine is possibly a good start . HKS did a single split pulsed turbo manifold for RB26's as part of a kit using a Garrett TA45S turbocharger . Personal theory but I reckon a Garrett GT4088R on one would be very impressive , particularly with the 30 bottom end .

Your call , cheers A .

I think you'd need the largest or 1.06 A/R turbine housing to get anywhere near 500 RWHP . Like I keep saying the exhaust gas flow goes up a sizeable amount between the 0.82 and the 1.06 GT30 turbine housings , more so than between the 0.63 and the 0.82 ones .

Yes you would get a certain amount of turbine lag with that 1.06 housing but you are asking for more than double the factory 240 odd CHP and at the wheels now .

Have a look at ATP's website , there is mention of a 1.06 A/R twin scroll turbine housing profiled for (from memory) GT3582R's and GT3076R's .

Almost sure to have a twin entry T4 International flange so maybe not much use to you .

Some won't agree but in my opinion you're going to need some fairly serious gas paths to make something like 220 WHP per litre engine size .

I dunno where you go from here but either an RB30 or at least an RB26 headed engine is possibly a good start . HKS did a single split pulsed turbo manifold for RB26's as part of a kit using a Garrett TA45S turbocharger . Personal theory but I reckon a Garrett GT4088R on one would be very impressive , particularly with the 30 bottom end .

Your call , cheers A .

well thats just great, so do you know what the upper limmit of this set up will be, i have forged bottom end, worked head by jhh, cams pfc, injetors, greedy plenum bla bla bla......... nothing has been missed and yet still wont get this goal? when i was ordering this turbine i was informed that this turbo could flow enough to support that amount of out put? ;)

ive put a circle on the water feed line and thats a nice turbo set up im got the same one on a hks low mount its a tight fit around the eng mount but goes hard

i went and had a look an cant use this pick up point as the motor is in the car, and im using a greedy plenum so factory water outlets are gone it so annoying.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...