Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I have been doing research here and there, and it seems Mitsubishis incorporate lean spool by factory. Their ECUs are so powerful in comparison to ours, dual maps (lo & hi octane), lean spool features, etc.. ra ra ra...

BUT I own a Nissan and I love them, enough of the crap ;)

I have been re-tuning my car here and there and I would like to see how others have their A/F set vs Spool.

Currently, I've played with my PowerFC and when the car comes onto boost it's quiet lean, on full boost A/F is around 11.7~12 which is safe and timing is at 13 degrees @ 18PSI, for some reason when I dial in even 1 extra degree I get retarted knock on a 30degree day, but at 13 degrees its fine, knock no more than 30.

So, could everyone post up their Boost vs A/F graphs? that would be great.

R31Nismoid, YES I have looked in the RB25 Dyno results. Mainly its all Power Graphs which I'm not interested in. :banana:

Sorry, I'm trying to establish what you are trying to determine - you mention spool but it sounds more like you are trying to work out why you are knock limited when trying to add timing at 18psi of boost?

I assume you are road tuning? Bare in mind not all things are equal with different cars, an obvious which would apply to your example would be turbo choice. If your car is experiencing high exhaust manifold pressure then you will be able to run far less timing than if you have no major restriction on the hot side. Same would good for good intake charge quality (good intercooling, not maxed out compressor, WMI etc...).

I have no AFR graphs for my car printed, but am targetting similar afrs - ranging from Stoich at very light load to around 11.6 at full (17ish psi on an RB25 running a GT3076R) boost.

Edited by Lithium

I agree, since i started playing with late model evo's, my thoyughts on spool a/f have changed. I no linger have any dramas tuning my cars to run 14.5 at 2psi, and 13.5 at 5 psi, this is dependent on the car and mods though obviously.

Hi All,

I have been doing research here and there, and it seems Mitsubishis incorporate lean spool by factory. Their ECUs are so powerful in comparison to ours, dual maps (lo & hi octane), lean spool features, etc.. ra ra ra...

BUT I own a Nissan and I love them, enough of the crap :)

I have been re-tuning my car here and there and I would like to see how others have their A/F set vs Spool.

Currently, I've played with my PowerFC and when the car comes onto boost it's quiet lean, on full boost A/F is around 11.7~12 which is safe and timing is at 13 degrees @ 18PSI, for some reason when I dial in even 1 extra degree I get retarted knock on a 30degree day, but at 13 degrees its fine, knock no more than 30.

So, could everyone post up their Boost vs A/F graphs? that would be great.

R31Nismoid, YES I have looked in the RB25 Dyno results. Mainly its all Power Graphs which I'm not interested in. :blush:

um nissan has had all that for decades also...

agreed, mitsu is factory tunable. evo 7 and up needs no modification PERIOD to be tuned. plug in and go. earlier models require a 7+ ecu and a minor re-pin, even the earlier models with the different motor. no less than excellent.

Yet I wonder, what would happen if you dropped the AFR to something a little richer and then tried to add the timing. Considered this?

um nissan has had all that for decades also...

Sorry trent, would have to disagree on this one, mitsu ecu's are far more powerful than the nissan rb ecu's.

SInce when does nissan have lean spool, which is an rpm/time/load dependant feature, active(knock monitered) ignition mapping on individual load points, and a total knock count ingition map trim?And mivec of course

what do you think is causing the knock?

do you think its the AFR's?

do you think its the intake temp?

do you think its the ign timing?

why do you need to run 18psi?

is your compressor efficient at that level

turbochargers once out of the efficiency island give diminshing results, that is, for every psi extra you dial in, you dial in assloads of hot air

the more hot air you dial in, the more the engine detonates

so - reasses - is 18psi efficient and giving you good gains, ie from 17 to 18psi do you gain 10kw or do you gain 1kw?

omg, I just read what I wrote, didn't make sense! trying to multitask at work, failed!

Forget about what I wrote about full load, I'm quite happy with the result I got, I'm just working on getting the boost to come on earlier.

anyways, what I am actually after is the A/F everyone runs when coming onto boost. I know the leaner the harder it will spool due to exhaust gases.

Paulr33, FYI I'm running HKS2535 and supporting mods, so chillax I'm not running a stock turbo like you!

No need to lecture me about turbo efficiency ra ra ra, yes HKS2535 is rated most optimum at 1bar but many have run them at 1.3bar and get quite outstanding results, such as Robo, and a few other people

So what I am after mainly are dyno graphs which have the boost vs a/f ratio pre full load

Sorry trent, would have to disagree on this one, mitsu ecu's are far more powerful than the nissan rb ecu's.

SInce when does nissan have lean spool, which is an rpm/time/load dependant feature, active(knock monitered) ignition mapping on individual load points, and a total knock count ingition map trim?And mivec of course

remmeber compare apples to apples ie year model to year model, the early evo stuff is pretty clunky also. Most of what you post is tweakable with aftermarket mapping gear.

lean spool = R32 gtr ecu feature

active(knock monitered) ignition mapping on individual load points= r32 gtr std ecu feature

total knock count ingition map trim= r32 gtr std ecu feature

mivec= nissan fail :) not till much later

the mitsy stuff of the same era (1990) was no better but if your comparing evo 6 onwards than yes they are a better beast.

to be honest the best stuff around is the holden (ls) and ford (fg) gear there is more features than nissan and mitsy combined (current r35 excluded)

somethings going on with that power curve .

knock knock whos there?!

and isnt 10psi and 15:1AFR at 3250rpm bad mmkay? thats just asking for EGT issues IMO...

knock knock whos there?!

and isnt 10psi and 15:1AFR at 3250rpm bad mmkay? thats just asking for EGT issues IMO...

nah the ramp afr's are pretty much ok, remmeber there is a lag between engine and tail pipe and a cat, so i reckon its closer to 13:1 and 5-6psi.

Trent from your experience, what A/F ramps are safe? do you have a graph I can look at?

Also, I notice I mainly get knock off lift off, why's that? there's no explanation on the web! I tried to alleviate the problem by dialling in more fuel and pulling back timing, it just results in FLAMES on the overrun LOL

i get random knock spikes at the exact point i lift off too, havent worried about it too much. use it as an excuse to keep going through to limiter :)

last worshop tune i got was on the very safe side and started at 14:1 at 2psi then linearly down to 11.5 at peak torque at 17psi, then back to 12:1 for the rest of the way. was 13:1 at around 6-7psi

Edited by JonnoHR31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
×
×
  • Create New...