Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt-r Injectors


Cam84
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just a quick one guys.

looking at doing afew mods this year, looking to push 250-270kw. just wondering if GT-R injectors would do this? and would it be safe or at thier limits.

tanks guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had 255rwkw with stock injectors fuel pump and turbos before upgrading. The tuner advised at that point that my AFM were maxed out but the injectors were fine. I only just upgraded to nismo 600cc so if you're after some R34 gtr injectors I've a set for sale so PM me if you're interested mate...

Edited by full_stick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had 255rwkw with stock injectors fuel pump and turbos before upgrading. The tuner advised at that point that my AFM were maxed out but the injectors were fine. I only just upgraded to nismo 600cc so if you're after some R34 gtr injectors I've a set for sale so PM me if you're interested mate...

Doesnt sound right... anyway nothing is the same when you're comparing old cars.

Just to give TS an idea, I know someone on the forum with another 33 N1 that has 330rwkw with close to 98% injector duty cycle and the only mod he's done are ecu, avcr, catback and cat (not 100% sure about cat but should be right). The only difference between N1s and standard gtrs are the engine, oil cooler, oil pump, water pump and no a/c. The other features doesnt really affect your power as much anyway (kelvar front diffuser etc).

Having said that, thats with an aggressive tune according to him and mine's running a safe tune with 255awkw at less than 90% duty cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesnt sound right... anyway nothing is the same when you're comparing old cars.

Hey mate just wondering what doesn't sound right? The maxed out AFMs at 255rwkw? It was Dr Drift who did that original tune and who provided that advice.

Edited by full_stick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey mate just wondering what doesn't sound right? The maxed out AFMs at 255rwkw? It was Dr Drift who did that original tune and who provided that advice.

Yes, they should not be any where near maxing out at 255kW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, they should not be any where near maxing out at 255kW.

+1. Never heard of anyone maxing out stock afm around 300awkw. Stock items should be sufficient for that but I must agree, injectors, fpr and fuel pump are very nice to have items to archieve that. Maybe check if the afm you have now are clean and in sound condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

being an ass n budding in... im after around 230awkw on my r32 rb20... will r32 gtr injectors fit my rb20 ? after reading they might save me buying new ones u kno... if so ill just get some 2nd hand gtr ones n get them cleaned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

being an ass n budding in... im after around 230awkw on my r32 rb20... will r32 gtr injectors fit my rb20 ? after reading they might save me buying new ones u kno... if so ill just get some 2nd hand gtr ones n get them cleaned

I think the difference between them are side and top feed + low impedance (gtr).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok doing some research found a old topic (search feature didn't work found through google.)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Gt...det-t62674.html

In all gtr injectors fit but u need the resistor pack and u gotta do some soldering :thumbsup:

but i dont think that hassle is worth it coz if u get different injectors later on taking off the resistor pack again will be draining... but i dunno if you will need to meh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok doing some research found a old topic (search feature didn't work found through google.)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Gt...det-t62674.html

In all gtr injectors fit but u need the resistor pack and u gotta do some soldering :thumbsup:

but i dont think that hassle is worth it coz if u get different injectors later on taking off the resistor pack again will be draining... but i dunno if you will need to meh...

Check out my thread for info on how to fit the resistor pack. A bit simpler than ripping apart the whole loom.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Gt...hl=gtr+injector

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, higher than 85% is ok if they are in good nick.

You'll end up leaning out, if you want to blow your engine run your injectors at 90% duty cycle + for a small period of time and watch what happens :(

The injectors go static and your fuel delivery goes out the window, you'll end up with a blown head.

A tuner shouldn't be tuning your injectors to run close to 100%, if he is, then he is a moron and just wants you back into the shop so he can rebuild your engine and get some extra cash :laugh:

Check out my thread for info on how to fit the resistor pack. A bit simpler than ripping apart the whole loom.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Gt...hl=gtr+injector

I don't really reccomend the resistor packs, they are usually dodgy, spend the extra and get a FJO Injector Driver and it will work properly.

http://www.fjoracing.com/products/injdrvr/

Edited by Parag0n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll end up leaning out, if you want to blow your engine run your injectors at 90% duty cycle + for a small period of time and watch what happens :)

The injectors go static and your fuel delivery goes out the window, you'll end up with a blown head.

A tuner shouldn't be tuning your injectors to run close to 100%, if he is, then he is a moron and just wants you back into the shop so he can rebuild your engine and get some extra cash :)

I already know of someone who ran Targa with 98% (max) a couple of times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are a few variables here, some are relevant but not critical (IMHO) to help answer your question. The two major things: 1) Ignoring anything to do with forced induction - all engines have their own natural torque curve, and it will ALWAYS roll over higher in the rpm.  There is a fixed relationship between power and torque.  When dealing with kw and nm, the relationship between them is roughly: kw = (rpm * nm) / 9549 nm = (kw / rpm) * 9549 The peak torque of an engine (without boost) will typically climb until somewhere nearish the middle of it's operating rev range, give or take a bit - then start dropping again.   The nearer the minimum and maximum rpm of the engine the steeper that drop off tends to be. 2) Boost simply increases the density of the air going into the engine, which inflates the torque at that point.  The ramp up in the torque curve you see on a turbo engine is due to the boost rising, but it's essentially just multiplying the torque you'd see if it was naturally aspirated.  The roll over you see at the end will typically be what would have always happened with the engine, whether it was naturally aspirated or turbocharged.   If the torque never started dropping then power would climb infinitely. The cool thing about this is you absolutely can tune the power delivery to suit the needs of the owner and/or the limitations of the car, and I regularly do this.    With modern turbos we've got to the point where a setup that someone may run well over 20psi of boost with could actually reach target boost well under 4000rpm if the tuner/owner WANTED to - and a lot of people seem to do this when there is actually no realistic benefit, generally it just adds a massive amount of strain to the engine and drivetrain and often actually makes the car harder to drive. As a general rule I tend to tune the boost curves for cars I tune to reach a "useful" torque level through the rev range and will often end up with a curve that ramps hard to a point, then creeps for the rest of the rev range - not to make the boost curve "soft" as such, but more to make sure its neither laggy nor pointlessly violent in it's delivery.   There have been cars I've tuned to be almost like a centrifugal supercharger (or naturally-aspirated-ish) where they actually only hit like 8psi of boost before opening the gate, then ramp up the next 10psi over the rev range... if the car is "loose enough" to drive. On the flip side I've tuned a car that had stock cams and the engine's natural torque curve fell over HARD in the higher rpm and resulted in a slightly awkward power curve to work with, in that case I actually started ramping up boost to boost torque in a way to offset the engines "NA" torque drop off... at peak rpm actually running a good 5psi+ more boost that what the "flat curve" would have defined.  This gave the owner an extra 500rpm or so of useable rev range, and had a fairly solid impact on times he was running at motorsport events due to being able to hold gears a bit longer and also falling into a more useful part of the rev range in the following gears. Here's an example of an RB in a GTSt I've done the "softened" boost curve to not pointlessly ramp straight to the max boost target early in the rpm, but still made sure it builds useful boost.  If you went in the car you'd not guess at all that the boost curve was doing anything "weird", it feels like it spools immediately and accelerates relentlessly (traction dependent) and holds to max rpm.   I don't know if you'd guess what the boost curve was doing by driving the car, or even looking at the dyno plot... but imho it suits the combination.  
    • therefore on the first examples, as we see, changing cams (graph 2) influences the quantity of torque at high revs its OK for me. so a tuner can act on the wastegate via the boost controller to increase the boost at high revs? on the last example, the boost does not decrease ok, but the torque does. this can come from cams etc etc ok. but on the other curves the boost is not constant, it increases, this is what I find strange to my mind. even more so if it comes from the relief valve. sorry I'm very new don't blame me. in my mind I couldn't imagine how the boost could be higher after the spool  
    • right, but fundamentally, for a given mechanical setup, you are either using all the torque (and therefore power) it will give, or you are choosing to run it less efficiently. Many tuners will have a practice of identifying peak available torque and then winding it back a couple of % for safety, but unless you are working around a very specific issue like a weak gearbox, there is nothing to be gained by making 20 or 30% less than the engine can
    • You can manipulate the torque delivery by ramping in boost gently, then throwing it all in after peak torque to keep the torque flat. It's nothing magical.
    • Tuning the wastegate to do it. That is all. Most people want the boost to not fall off like the most recent example. Those also look like dyno runs with an Auto/Torque converter setup, which does fun things to the graph. The boost tapers down like that because the turbo cannot supply the same amount of air at 7000rpm that it can at 3000 in terms of PSI. That, or the tuner has decided that it tapering off like that is what someone chose to do. IF you have a wastegate that can't bleed enough air to slow the turbine, and IF that turbo can flow enough air to feed the engine at high RPM, you get 'boost creep' which is a rise of boost pressure beyond what you are capable of controlling and/or want. None of these show symptoms of that, but if you had a run that was 20psi at 3000rpm, and 27psi at 7000rpm, it could be an example of that. Or simply that the person wanted boost later for their own reasons... The dyno graphs don't always show the full context.
×
×
  • Create New...