Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I'm from over in the Uk and have recently purchased an Autech Stagea, in quite standard form. It has a Nismo ECU and lots of other Nismo parts. Question is, what engine does the car have, is it a Nismo Block and turbos ?

How would I find out ? :D

Moff

Edited by Moff
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/303449-atuech-stagea-engine/
Share on other sites

Post up your vin no and someone may be kind enough to look it up on the FAST system

The Stagea 260Rs was built by Autech from standard RS4T off the assembly line. There was a smaller number of these made as Nismo versions with more power or you may just have the RS260 intowhich someone has added the Nismo goodies.

I've had a quick look on fast, but doesn't seem to give much info on the engine and turbo itself

wgnc34-105842

I had it dyno'd at 1 bar, managed 315 BHP hubs and 305 lb/ft (de-cat, exhaust and Panel filter) on a RWD dyno.

Is there anyway I can tell what variant ?

Stock 260RS's has R33 engine's, just normal 05U blocks, not N1's which is commonly beleived, they also only have stock 33 GTR turbo's.

Depending on the dyno 315 at the hubs is close on 1bar for stock turbo's etc.

  Moff said:
Hi Guys,

I'm from over in the Uk and have recently purchased an Autech Stagea, in quite standard form. It has a Nismo ECU and lots of other Nismo parts. Question is, what engine does the car have, is it a Nismo Block and turbos ?

How would I find out ? :D

Moff

Can you post up some pics? Never seen a Nismo Stag other than advertisements. Porn.

Cheers GW

I do not know if it is a Nismo version, that is what I am trying find out... Can anyone with an Autech confirm if their ECU is the same as mine ?

The number plate came with the car :D

14331_214161748937_517068937_3033478_581377_n.jpg

14331_214161773937_517068937_3033479_7165133_n.jpg

14331_214161778937_517068937_3033480_6454523_n.jpg

14331_214161793937_517068937_3033481_5400584_n.jpg

14331_214161803937_517068937_3033482_642447_n.jpg

09012010089.jpg

09012010087.jpg

09012010092.jpg

SCAN0197.JPG

SCAN0195.JPG

SCAN0196.JPG

Edited by Moff
  Moff said:
09012010092.jpg

Haven't got an AWD dyno?

Couldn't be stuffed ripping out the front shaft and fuse to make it run in RWD?

Don't stress!

Just jack up the front of the car with two standard jacks to get the front wheels off the ground and start your power run!

Can't possibly see anything going wrong here...

  iamhe77 said:
Haven't got an AWD dyno?

Couldn't be stuffed ripping out the front shaft and fuse to make it run in RWD?

Don't stress!

Just jack up the front of the car with two standard jacks to get the front wheels off the ground and start your power run!

Can't possibly see anything going wrong here...

OMFG.....ROFL....just realised....nah there not doing that are they... :(

BTW....love the RS260.....there an awesome wagon once you get em going.....still wish I had gone that way instead of the M35!

it's okay chassis dyno... Rear wheels have been removed and the hubs are actually bolted to the dyno...

Given that they advertise as Skyline specialists, I would imagine that this is farely normal for them...

http://www.mgt-racing.com/

To answer the original question, you've got an Autech 260RS that was sent to the Nismo Omori factory for Sports Resetting, which included and intake, computer and plugs. Think of it as a remap (a very expensive one, I might add) that gives you probably 30bhp over standard, but it's mainly designed to boost torque across the midrange to compensate for the thing being so heavy :(

http://www.nismo.co.jp/omori_factory/origi...m/sr/index.html

Quote "I do not know if it is a Nismo version, that is what I am trying find out... Can anyone with an Autech confirm if their ECU is the same as mine ?

The number plate came with the car "

Unquote

Thanks for the pics anyway moff, Nice wagon! Looks just like mine used to..........only much cleaner. The reason I wanted to see a pic btw is the Nismo jobs have a different grill, same shape as de pulsar gtir. Or at least the pic I have seen did. Would be able to tell straight up if she was the Nismo version in that case I reckon. No doubt others will disagree but my 2c.

Cheers GW

Just changed the cat to a de-cat, and it was a racing cat that was in there.

You guys are right :blink:

So far it seems, ECU, racing cat, induction kit are different.

Does anyone know of any other differences I should look for ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...