Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I'm from over in the Uk and have recently purchased an Autech Stagea, in quite standard form. It has a Nismo ECU and lots of other Nismo parts. Question is, what engine does the car have, is it a Nismo Block and turbos ?

How would I find out ? :D

Moff

Edited by Moff
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/303449-atuech-stagea-engine/
Share on other sites

Post up your vin no and someone may be kind enough to look it up on the FAST system

The Stagea 260Rs was built by Autech from standard RS4T off the assembly line. There was a smaller number of these made as Nismo versions with more power or you may just have the RS260 intowhich someone has added the Nismo goodies.

I've had a quick look on fast, but doesn't seem to give much info on the engine and turbo itself

wgnc34-105842

I had it dyno'd at 1 bar, managed 315 BHP hubs and 305 lb/ft (de-cat, exhaust and Panel filter) on a RWD dyno.

Is there anyway I can tell what variant ?

Stock 260RS's has R33 engine's, just normal 05U blocks, not N1's which is commonly beleived, they also only have stock 33 GTR turbo's.

Depending on the dyno 315 at the hubs is close on 1bar for stock turbo's etc.

Hi Guys,

I'm from over in the Uk and have recently purchased an Autech Stagea, in quite standard form. It has a Nismo ECU and lots of other Nismo parts. Question is, what engine does the car have, is it a Nismo Block and turbos ?

How would I find out ? :D

Moff

Can you post up some pics? Never seen a Nismo Stag other than advertisements. Porn.

Cheers GW

I do not know if it is a Nismo version, that is what I am trying find out... Can anyone with an Autech confirm if their ECU is the same as mine ?

The number plate came with the car :D

14331_214161748937_517068937_3033478_581377_n.jpg

14331_214161773937_517068937_3033479_7165133_n.jpg

14331_214161778937_517068937_3033480_6454523_n.jpg

14331_214161793937_517068937_3033481_5400584_n.jpg

14331_214161803937_517068937_3033482_642447_n.jpg

09012010089.jpg

09012010087.jpg

09012010092.jpg

SCAN0197.JPG

SCAN0195.JPG

SCAN0196.JPG

Edited by Moff
09012010092.jpg

Haven't got an AWD dyno?

Couldn't be stuffed ripping out the front shaft and fuse to make it run in RWD?

Don't stress!

Just jack up the front of the car with two standard jacks to get the front wheels off the ground and start your power run!

Can't possibly see anything going wrong here...

Haven't got an AWD dyno?

Couldn't be stuffed ripping out the front shaft and fuse to make it run in RWD?

Don't stress!

Just jack up the front of the car with two standard jacks to get the front wheels off the ground and start your power run!

Can't possibly see anything going wrong here...

OMFG.....ROFL....just realised....nah there not doing that are they... :(

BTW....love the RS260.....there an awesome wagon once you get em going.....still wish I had gone that way instead of the M35!

it's okay chassis dyno... Rear wheels have been removed and the hubs are actually bolted to the dyno...

Given that they advertise as Skyline specialists, I would imagine that this is farely normal for them...

http://www.mgt-racing.com/

To answer the original question, you've got an Autech 260RS that was sent to the Nismo Omori factory for Sports Resetting, which included and intake, computer and plugs. Think of it as a remap (a very expensive one, I might add) that gives you probably 30bhp over standard, but it's mainly designed to boost torque across the midrange to compensate for the thing being so heavy :(

http://www.nismo.co.jp/omori_factory/origi...m/sr/index.html

Quote "I do not know if it is a Nismo version, that is what I am trying find out... Can anyone with an Autech confirm if their ECU is the same as mine ?

The number plate came with the car "

Unquote

Thanks for the pics anyway moff, Nice wagon! Looks just like mine used to..........only much cleaner. The reason I wanted to see a pic btw is the Nismo jobs have a different grill, same shape as de pulsar gtir. Or at least the pic I have seen did. Would be able to tell straight up if she was the Nismo version in that case I reckon. No doubt others will disagree but my 2c.

Cheers GW

Just changed the cat to a de-cat, and it was a racing cat that was in there.

You guys are right :blink:

So far it seems, ECU, racing cat, induction kit are different.

Does anyone know of any other differences I should look for ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...