Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, i have a R33 with the usual minor mods (Exhaust, pod, cooler) and have tuned the exhaust cam timing on a dyno to get the best air/fuel mix and power.

Recently i changed the timing belt and even though i marked where the exhaust cam adjustment was, after putting it back together i notice it is running rich and using a lot of fuel. Also lacking that little bit more power i was able to get previously.

I have searched the forums and couldnt find any other previous post regarding the adjusting of the exhaust cam.

What i would like to no is, which way does the cam timing adjust need to be turned to retard or advance this timing. Also which will be leaner, retarding or advancing.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/303540-exhaust-cam-timing-adjustment/
Share on other sites

altering the cam timing shouldn't have any effect on fuel mixture as all it is doing is determining then the cams are opening the valves (if you are talking about adjusting the actual cams). if you are talking about adjusting the ignition timing via the CAS (crank angle sensor) then that isn't adjusting the cams, just when the spark plugs make the fuel go bang, but again shouldn't really alter the fuel mixtures unless you are getting detonation and the ecu is backing off the timing and richening up the mixtures a bit.

maybe your power loss is due to the hot weather as that can affect it quite a bit if you get 1 dyno run done on a cold day and the next done on a stinking hot day.

It must be called something different to what i was told so i pointed it out on this picture below.

Previously when i ran it on the dyno, we adjusted this and managed to get 6rwkw more and and more stable and better air/fuel mix. I would just like the crack the bolts and move it slightly one way to hopefully make it a touch leaner if i can.

Can anyone tell me which way is retarding and which is advancing?

post-33678-1263277737_thumb.jpg

That's the CAS - Crank Angle Sensor - and is used to set ignition timing. The only relationship to the exhaust cam is that the exhaust cam drives the CAS.

You really shouldn't be fiddling that because you risk setting hi-load hi-rev timing that will induce detonation. Just set it so your timing at idle is 15 deg BTDC, and leave it alone after that.

As mad082 said, you may have lost a bit of power due to the hot weather.

Thankyou heaps for the info, that makes so much more sense now, caus even driving in 3rd just slowly accelerating at about 55km it has a slight flat spot like when the coils fail. Ill give that a go and see how it turns out :thumbsup:

  • 2 weeks later...

the big problem with adjusting timing is first working out how to use the timing light because they are made 4 cars with leads this can be overcome by putting a extension piece between cylinder 1 coil and spark plug. 2 u wont know how the car will react under boost and u may get detonation :O unless running on a dyno adjust 1° and give the car some bean in 1st to redline if all is good then u can go 1° more, if ur car starts to make any funny sounds then go back 1° also u will be able to tweak the timing more on high octane fuel and also when u test ur car try to do it at night as the air is cooler.

i would not tweak the timing any more than 13° unless running water injection if so go all the way to 9° :P

*note plz dont hold me responsible if any thing goes wrong

um, i'm pretty sure the stock timing is 15 degrees, and if you are going to 13 degrees you are actually retarding the timing and you will lose power and if you get pinging from retarding the engine you have some serious engine issues, or don't know what detonation is. secondly, often detonation isn't audible over the sound of a screaming engine until you are getting a hell of a lot of it. on some cars just the sound of the injectors or noisey lifters can sound like detonation.

also running the car in 1st gear to check for detonation isn't the best as in first gear the car will rev up quickly and not get as much load on it as in higher gears. the higher the load the more chance of detonation. so you would be best of checking for detonation in 4th gear, or whatever gear givs you a 1:1 ratio (for example 4 spd autos it's usually 3rd gear)

also working out how to use the timing light isn't a big problem. it's a small problem for cars with coil packs and as you said, very easy to overcome.

ok i have pulled out the nissan book and it says that a RB25det should be at 15° +/- 1° at 650 rpm +/- 50 rpm. this is the same 4 rb25det and rb25de so im guessing that the ecu will automatic retard the ignition.

im pretty shore that the closer to 0° the more compression u will have = more power right hmm but at the risk of detonation

the orange line = 0° and each white line is = to 5°

i said 1st because u wont be speeding so that makes testing on the street a lot more safer it would be better to test in a higher gear but u dont want to get done doing +120km/h in a 60 zone

timing works the other way. the earlier the spark the more bang you get, to an extent. the reason being that all the fuel doesn't ignite the moment the spark fires. this takes time. if you ignite the fuel at 0 degreesthe piston will already be falling away by the time the fuel starts to ignite and therefor will lose most of it's power as even though it is expanding as it fires, it is now expending at the same time as the area it has to expand in is also getting bigger. also it means the some of the fuel will be moving away from the flames and take much longer to get burntup, or possibly not get burnt at all.

if you make the timing fire sooner (advance, so make the number higher) you end up increasing the pressure in the cylinder as you have more fuel getting burnt before maximum compression. and as we all know, hot air is less dense than cold air, so once it is fully compressed then you have a higer pressure and it will push the piston back down with more force. where detonation/pinging comes into this is that by having more fuel burnt, and more gases in the chamber there is more heat. and the more you compress something the hotter it gets (hence why we have intercoolers), you get higher cylinder temps and engine temps. then once the engine is on its next cycle and fresh fuel/air comes in, there is more heat being radiated out of the cylinder walls, and as the piston starts compressing the air and fuel, this extra heat can cause the fuel to ignite prior to the spark being fired (hence the term pre-ignition) or can just make the fuel burn unevenly.

pre-ignition is most obvious in an older car not running fuel injection. if you drive it hard when the timing is a bit out or it is a bit lean and get the cylinder temps too high then stop and turn the car off it may continue to run. this is because when you turn the car off only the spark stops, but the carby supplies fuel based off vaccum and while the engine is turning it is creating vaccum so it continues to pump in fuel and any hot spots in the cylinders will make the fuel ignite and the car will continue to run until it cools down enough to not ignite the fuel anymore, or until you put the car in gear and stall it. the missus old datsun stanza used to do this occasionally on hot days if you drove it hard.

that is my understanding of timing. may not be 100% correct, but i think it's pretty close.

Mad, thats a great explanation, thanks.

Can someone explain what kind of extension to use between the coilpack and spark plug to hook a timing light up to? Just any kind of wire with 3 prongs, or something more sophisticated?

i used a extension piece from a socket set and some electrical tape it was very dodge but it worked

ok mad

i have looked around and u are right about ignition timing i was wrong sorry if i confused any body

its just if u think about it like i was if the spark plug is firing b4 TDS wont the engine spin backwards. "every body ignore this statement as it could be confusing"

i know what you mean about thinking about shouldn't the engine spin backwards. if all the fuel combusted the exact instant that the spark fired then that would be the case, but since it takes time ignite and burn then it doesn't cause the engine to spin backwards.

  • 4 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'd be installing 2x widebands and using the NB simulation outputs to the ECU.
    • Nah, it's different across different engines and as the years went on. R32 era RB20, and hence also RB26, the TPS SWITCH is the idle command. The variable resistor is only for the TCU, as you say. On R33 era RB25 and onwards (but probably not RB26, as they still used the same basic ECU from the R32 era), the idle command is a voltage output of close to 0.45V from the variable resistor.
    • It's actually one of the worst bits of Nissan nomenclature (also compounded by wiring diagrams when the TCU is incorporated in ECU, or, ECU has a passthru to a standalone TCU).... the gripe ~ they call it the TPS, but with an A/T it's actually a combined unit ...TPS (throttle position switch) + TPS (throttle position sensor).... ..by the looks of it (and considering car is A/T) you have this unit... https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/2262002u11 The connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit, is the TPS (throttle position sensor) ...only the TCU reads this. The connector on the unit body, is the TPS (throttle position switch) ...ECU reads this. It has 3 possible values -- throttle closed (idle control contact), open (both contacts open, ECU controls engine...'run' mode), and WOT (full throttle contact closed, ECU changes mapping). When the throttle is closed (idle control contact), this activates what the patent describes as the 'anti stall system' ~ this has the ECU keep the engine at idling speed, regardless of additional load/variances (alternator load mostly, along with engine temp), and drives the IACV solenoid with PWM signal to adjust the idle air admittance to do this. This is actually a specific ECCS software mode, that only gets utilized when the idle control contact is closed. When you rotate the TPS unit as shown, you're opening the idle control contact, which puts ECCS into 'run' mode (no idle control), which obviously is a non-sequitur without the engine started/running ; if the buzzing is coming from the IACV solenoid, then likely ECCS is freaking out, and trying to raise engine rpm 'any way it can'...so it's likely pulling the valve wide open....this is prolly what's going on there. The signal from the connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit (for the TCU), should be around 0.4volts with the throttle closed (idle position) ~ although this does effect low throttle shift points if set wrong, the primary purpose here is to tell TCU engine is at idle (no throttle demand), and in response lower the A/T line pressure ... this is often described as how much 'creep' you get with shifter in D at idle. The way the TPS unit is setup (physically), ensures the idle control contact closes with a high margin on the TPSensor signal wire, so you can rotate the unit on the adjustment slots, to achieve 0.4v whilst knowing the idle control contact is definitely closed. The IACV solenoid is powered by battery voltage via a fuse, and ground switched (PWM) by the ECU. When I check them, I typically remove the harness plug, feed the solenoid battery voltage and switch it to ground via a 5watt bulb test probe ; thing should click wide open, and idle rpm should increase... ...that said though, if it starts & idles with the TPS unit disconnected, and it still stalls when it gets up to operating temperature, it won't be the IACV because it's unused, which would infer something else is winking out...  
    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
×
×
  • Create New...