Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

today, my mate in a Caldina GT-T (with aftermarket exhaust, and unknown other mods) handed it to a white RS Four S with FMIC and unknown other mods at the TLGP (i was next to them both in my Pulsar, lol)

i drove the Caldina the other day and it's a pretty quick car

i guess our 1600+kgs is too big a penalty???

fwiw, i have a stock RS Four S and it feels nowhere near as quick as the Caldina :)

discuss :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/303609-rs-four-s-vs-caldina-gt-t/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

3SGTE is a nice little motor.

There was a good comparo posted somewhere.

Do you want a smaller wagon, smaller motor and more chuckable car? or do you want a more useable wagon, well known RB and the GT-Tourer wagon Stagea?

If you want a sports car, buy an Elise, if you want a car that can fit a fridge in the boot, yet drive like a large car, enjoy your stagea.

I would stick to the stagea simply for the RB, a well known motor, and something I have owned a few of.

caldina fails in the looks department. :P kinda like a tarago had a kid with a GT Startlet. and as ryan said, a smaller wagon, not really big enough to serve as a wagon, they're more like a sporty grocery transport. You can enjoy the specials from Catalogue AU brands after driving to the store.

in stock form they make slightly less power than a stagea, but also weigh less. stagea's are fair slugs as stock and still even with basic mods, the 4cyl probably responds better the basic mods than the 6cyl?

stagea's power delivery is also very smooth, caldina being a 2ltr would be more noticeable when coming on boost and hence it would feel quicker.

i think it comes down to weather your a nissan or a toyota person, i'd say its nearly the same kind of relationship as the ford vs holden one. i like nissan, i've owned a few, and specifically RB powered ones, so IMO the stagea is the go.

Edited by QWK32

When I was first looking at Stageas, I took a Caldina for a drive to see how they were. It was fun to drive, felt like it had a bit more poke than the Stagea, but I couldnt stand the interior, and it felt very cramped inside, it somehow managed to seem even smaller than my Pulsar. Part of the reason I went for the Stagea was because it would be more comfortable for daily driving.

caldina fails in the looks department. :P kinda like a tarago had a kid with a GT Startlet. and as ryan said, a smaller wagon, not really big enough to serve as a wagon, they're more like a sporty grocery transport.

in stock form they make slightly less power than a stagea, but also weigh less. stagea's are fair slugs as stock and still even with basic mods, the 4cyl probably responds better the basic mods than the 6cyl?

stagea's power delivery is also very smooth, caldina being a 2ltr would be more noticeable when coming on boost and hence it would feel quicker.

i think it comes down to weather your a nissan or a toyota person, i'd say its nearly the same kind of relationship as the ford vs holden one. i like nissan, i've owned a few, and specifically RB powered ones, so IMO the stagea is the go.

beauty is in the eye of the beerholder :)

and compared to my stock RS Four S, and also given the fact that the stock Caldina does not deliver peak torque until 4400rpm, my mates Caldina is surprisingly linear in terms of power delivery

i think weight is giving us the biggest disadvantage

i'm neither pro or against Nissan or Toyota, i'm pro performance :)

the Stag suits my needs better at this point in time, due to the bigger boot

i wouldn't say no to a Caldina sitting beside it in the driveway though :)

The Stag's weight wouldn't have done it any favours. Chuck some semi-decent money at the RB though and the Caldina won't stand a chance. The reason the Caldina was driving so fast was that he didn't want the Stagea driver to look in and check out his sh*thouse interior :D

Put them both up against a similarly modded Legnum and watch as the Mitsi heads out in front.

However put them up against a 260RS with boost restrictor cut and a 'zaust and watch it show them how its done :)

Is it the 4G63 in the Legnum? 4G Mitsi lineage is great to this day, I used to have a Lancer GSR and loved it to bits, but that late 90's family face and 'edgy' styling on the Legnums (Similar to the late 90's Magnas, early Pathfinders etc etc) is so tired now, I'd rather get kicked in the face by a golf shoe :D

Early Caldina is shocking to behold IMO, later one is not bad though, looks more like a mini MPV than a Touring wagon. Shorter wheel base with similar height gives it Tarago'esque profile.

Edited by stageaharts

Last time I was at the strip there were 3 to 4 GT-T Caldinas, they were running low 16's to high 15's on a rather slick track surface. Comparable times to the Soarer V8's.

Not particularly impressive, the Stags that I did see run were sitting in the mid to high 15 second bracket, so I'd have to say that its quite an even match, hard to tell TBH.

Is it the 4G63 in the Legnum? 4G Mitsi lineage is great to this day, I used to have a Lancer GSR and loved it to bits, but that late 90's family face and 'edgy' styling on the Legnums (Similar to the late 90's Magnas, early Pathfinders etc etc) is so tired now, I'd rather get kicked in the face by a golf shoe :D

Early Caldina is shocking to behold IMO, later one is not bad though, looks more like a mini MPV than a Touring wagon. Shorter wheel base with similar height gives it Tarago'esque profile.

Nope. Not the 4G63.

Legnums run a twin turbo V6 don't know then engine code though

Yes they do. I believe it is the 6A13.

Edited by iamhe77

i looked at all the options before settling on the stag.

caldina. looks too much like a torago, and not that much space / shitty interior (guitarist gear would be tight fit) (cant get manual either???)

would have been interested to see what a "chaser" wagon would have looked like

legnum. looks okay.. goes well.. but parts not so easily available like the RB25

M35. i didnt really go heaps on the styling, but they can look okay with some work...... and i wanted a manual, and parts not exactly common like the C34.

:rolleyes: now i just gotta wait for the GT-R wagon to be commissioned.

Edited by atomaly

fail

define "handed it to"

and what use are we to discuss how "quick" your stagea feels to you.

caldinas are "quick" in the same way a wrx feels "quick" . pity about the agricultral 4wd system they both use ........

There is a difference between "quick" and "fast".

Gearing and power/weight, and the power/torque curves all effect this. They are two very different cars, with two very different routes.

Try comparing a Celica GT4 to a GTR or an imaginary AWD R33.5 GTST

a good friend of mine was looking at caldinas a while back. we went to compression test three in the same day (2 were in the same workshop, another one was at a yard) and all of them had at least 2 spark plugs which were wet with oil when we pulled them out.

the odds are astronomically high that we could hit three in a row, on the same day and it not be a design fault. so my mate found a legnum in good condition and bought that.

the legnums run small turbos though, smaller than a T25 from memory?

Yup.. Same as a Magna... Hence platinum plugs (100,000km life) for the rear bank of cylinders, under the manifold, and normal plugs (30,000k) for the front...

Had a mate who when his magna was serviced wondered why there were only 3 plugs listed in the parts fitted...

Yep, small turbos on the "Legumes," and any servicing work would be a PITA to do - replacing spark plugs is apparently a job which requires removing the inlet manifold.

FAIL!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can perhaps see how the R33 appreciators would think so.  
    • Thanks, I removed the fuse and the relay from the car and made my own circuit with them to test them with a test bulb.  I will look for the wiring diagram and go from there.
    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
×
×
  • Create New...