Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

RB30DET.

Where the engine rebuilder is getting the pistons, they open up apparently this week, so its soon. ;)

If you don't go forged pistons in the RB30E short motor and use the standard NA pistons you will have a 8-8.3:1 CR, which is good for turbo. Without forged pistons you will be stuck reliably at 250rwkw with a good tune. If you start heading towards 300rwkw the cast pistons wont handle the heat and break.

I used a R32 GTS RB25DE head (Like yours) had it rebuilt, ported/polished & inlet valves deshrouded. The cam specs for the head are 240dur 7.8mm lift on the inlet and 232dur 7.3mm lift on the exhaust. I'm going to use the 240dur 7.8mm exhaust cam from my RB20DET to help open up the top end a bit more. If it makes power to 6000-6500rpm then starts to drop off I'll leave the cams standard. If it drops off before 6000rpm then I'll throw a set of 256dur 9mm lift cams in it.

Do your figures. Work out how much its going to cost to get an RB25DET & RB20DET in the car with a working ecu (RB25DET = wiring mods, RB20DET will work easily with a T ECU), then work out what it will cost to give a RB30E short motor a freshen up (~1-1.2k) buy a head gasket, bolt on your RB25DE head, pop down to a jap importer & grab your self a cheap highflowed turbo, buy an second hand exhaust (~$700) then get your ecu remaped and have a solid easy 200rwkw with no lag and quick acceleration as you idle off from a set of lights. :P

It stresses me having to play with the clutch then waiting for the turbo in first to try and take off a little quicker than normal.

..Do your figures. Work out how much its going to cost to get an RB25DET & RB20DET in the car with a working ecu (RB25DET = wiring mods, RB20DET will work easily with a T ECU), then work out what it will cost to give a RB30E short motor a freshen up (~1-1.2k) buy a head gasket, bolt on your RB25DE head, pop down to a jap importer & grab your self a cheap highflowed turbo, buy an second hand exhaust (~$700) then get your ecu remaped and have a solid easy 200rwkw with no lag and quick acceleration as you idle off from a set of lights. :P

 

It stresses me having to play with the clutch then waiting for the turbo in first to try and take off a little quicker than normal.

I should proibably point out that i only have an RB20DE atm, meaning to go to RB30-type stuff, i would need another head (RB25DE) as well as block, turbo, ecu, wiring, Dump pipes, Intercooler etc, etc. as you've already suggested. some things i was wondering about though are the RB25DET you said would require a wiring change - aren't the sensors and stuff the same? it would definitely need another ECU to handle the increased airflow, different capacity etc, but shouldn't it just plug straight into the existing harness? As for the RB20DE, would that even make a worthwhile difference ? or would it be bettter to just hold off and go all out with the RB30 idea? <- this last ones open for comment, btw.

phil

Joel,

You forgot to mention new injectors and fuel pump also, as the GTS Gear won't cope.

Trust me I added up the cost both ways for my conversion, and the RB25DET works out a lot cheaper, every time!

It's costing me:

$2100 for a 1995 RB25DET (64,000 km) engine, ecu, intercooler, wiring loom and fuel pump

$600 for a CES twin dump/front pipe (though you could get a cheaper single dump for $250)

$315 GReddy Turbo timer and Apexi pod filter

$800 labour to swap it all over

And after it's complete I can sell my RB25DE engine, ECU, and wiring - to recoupe some of the costs.

Sure a RB30DET would be nice, but when I added it all up (doing it properly and not dodgy) it was going to cost in the region of $8000 - (RB30 bottom end with forged pistons and balanced internals, turbo + manifold, dump/front pipe, intercooler + piping, blowoff valve, fuel pump, aftermarket computer to run the larger injectors). And with the RB30DET putting out so much torque, it would surely destroy my clutch and gearbox.

I am envious though Joel, if I could justify throwing the money at a RB30 conversion, I would have. But at the end of the day the RB25DET made far more sense.

Ryno

It is a bit of a bummer if you don't have turbo to start off with.

 

I'd just bolt up the turbo bits to the NA with its decent compression ratio it should go well, better than a similiar modded T.

I think go to pieces might be more accurate... :P the high compression ratio would put way to much strain on the internals, or so im told. I think there were some posts earlier on in this thread about the addition of a turbo to a N/A engine... ill have to check though...

All comes down to how much power do you want to make. Be it now or later down the track.

Its a bit of a waste of money to buy a RB25DET if you are only going to rebuild it with stronger internals, different turbo,injectors, I think this is where the RB30DET begins to become better value for money.

It can also depends how much your willing to pay extra to have a freshly rebuilt engine.

Work out the $$, the pros & cons then make a decision.

I've always liked cubes. :D

Comparing the RB25 to the RB20, 500cc's makes a hell of a difference.

While your spooling i'll be short shifting down the road. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would like more noise related info for my truly uneducated guess  Does it do it at idle or when revving, clutch engaged, and disengaged? Does it only do it when the car is moving? I've heard "similar" noises from a clutch pack that left the chat room, and CV joints that have chewed themselves out But as Matt said, how's the yokes, tailshaft and centre bearing going after their last little issue Fingers crossed it is something simple  Weird noises make me cringe 
    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...