Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hoping someone may be able to help us out

just got my new motor going forged internals big sump etc. etc.

Head was checked out and setup to run my Tomei poncams I had used previously

Now its running and all seems happyish

except only seeing -35 kpa vac at idle (factory spec -65 kpa)

this on the stock gauge appears as the mark half way to -700 mmHg (factory spec should be -480 mmHg)

would love to know what others with poncams are seeing

cams will obviously effect vacume at idle but this seems a bit excessive

have checked and cant seem to find any other vac leaks???????????????

any assistance apreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304566-rb26-vacuum-at-idle/
Share on other sites

Yeh cams will affect vacuum, wats the duration and lift of these cams?

also double, triple, and quadruple check your intake side, for vacuum leaks. Im fighting a leak right now, and its a prick of a thing.

but id say its just the cams. does it rev and idle ok?

if it pops, farts and stumbles when you rev it, thatll be a vacuum leak, otherwise, its the cams.

thanks for the replys

car runs well idle is a bit up'n down 900ish to maybe as high as 1000 rpm

but seems to be reasonably steady round 950ish once properly warm

car is not making much power though at really small throttle openings

eg trying to get up a steep driveway

new motor and new twin plate OS Giken so a new learning curve I spose as well

Have not done a real tuning run for power yet just checked afr's etc and loaded it up for a bit on the dyno

need rego next to put some km's on it

Am hoping once i get the cam timing done an a proper power tune it will be better

edit: poncams so 264 9.6 on both (if memory serves me right)

Edited by noone

sorry man i dont have much experience with 26s... ill just say that in advance lol

stock duration is 240 deg IIRC so youve got an increase of 15deg there, should shift your powerband up a fair bit, but i cant see it having that much of a drastic affect of your idle, the overlap wouldnt be THAT major. compared to say, the 285s that some people use. in theory, if 265s cause you to loose that much idle vacuum, a car with 285s would barely idle sub 1000rpm!

but

idle is a bit up'n down
that is a classic symptom of a vacuum leak on a MAF sensored car. try spraying carb cleaner/aero start around the intake manifold, and if your idle changes or your misfire etc, youve found your vacuum leak.

i guess you're gonna have to hear from another 26 owner as to the vacuum they see...

do you still have the ITBs?

Yeah ITB's am wondering if I still have a leak the cams are not that big

tried some carby cleaner but no real joy

After reading bout your drama with injector o-rings will try n blast some aerostart or somesuch

around there an see if that shows anything up

yeh that fkn o-ring was my problem... prick of a thing to get to on my car, entire top half of the intake manifold needs to come off to get to the fuel rail (like half an hour job even though ive done it like 10 times now)

good luck bro, hope ya get it sorted. darwin needs more GTR love on the streets lol

car is not making much power though at really small throttle openings

eg trying to get up a steep driveway

Am hoping once i get the cam timing done an a proper power tune it will be better

Well you have a problem, and you know what's likely causing it...

The setup by your own admission isn't even done yet.

Its very hard to say what is wrong or right, if you've yet to sort it all out...

Side note - you may well find the driveway issue won't go away. Part and parcel of larger cams.

These cams are not exactly new to me

Ran they in my last motor as stated in the first post

though had cam timing sorted on install so I spose without cam gears adjusted they might be that doughy down low

but I doubt it

Basic setup has been done, just not power tune :)

afrs etc looked fine tuner didnt really notice anything amiss till he did a lap of the block

to make sure no drivability issues, an there it was, along with an oil leak from the cam cover half moon seal

Appreciate the help though guys

Darwin definitely needs more GTR's

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy on your suggestion on another thread I had a look at those injectors and ended up getting them because of the quality.  Got the expensive ones.  
    • Hey guys been looking everywhere to try and find the correct gtr hood latch support part number but only found the first half and when I search with that number it sends me to an r34. The first part I found was 62515. If anyone could help me with the rest then I’d really appreciate it. Or if there’s some alternative hood latch support that would work even better cause I can’t find any for sale. (Searched on upgarage, partsouq,buyee,rhdjapan) 
    • If you've only done the upper control arms on the rear, AND you have changed their length (by more than about 1mm) to set the camber you want, then you will definitely need/want to install traction arms also. Adjusting the camber arms on their own WILL introduce bump steer and make the car unpleasant to drive. Most owners have no idea that their car could behave infinitely better than what they put up with. I'm not entirely sure what the Stageas need, but I am thinking that unless you have massive front spring rates and pretty soft rear springs, you have waaaay too much rear bar. Oversteer city, in my estimation. Combined with possible excessive bump steer from maladjusted arms, that could be a recipe for nastiness. ATR43SS2 is not a highflow. It is an outright replacement turbo. It's a little bit bigger than the largest highflow profile that Tao does. Probably a solid 300rwkW turbo where the bigger highflows will be about 30-40rwkW less. Nevertheless, we're only talking about ~300 rwkW, which is well within the abilities of the stock ECu to run with a Nistune on board. I would do so without hesitation - and I will be doing so when I get my finger out and actually get the injectors and AFM installed. But, if you would prefer to drop a whole lot more money on the ECU side, then I suspect you're looking at Haltech. The Haltech fanbois here will all spout on about all the available engine protection you can have, that you can't have with the Nistune option. And they're right. But it doesn't really come for free either. You will spend more money on extra sensors and the like, plus the work to install them. If the engine was built and therefore represented a big investment to protect, then I'd say definitely do it. If you view the current (and forever into the future) shortage of replacement engines as something to prompt similar protection, then also, do it. If you see a destroyed RB25 as an opportunity to put in a Mercedes or other V12 (like I kinda do)... then your perception of the risk/reward might differ. These are good injectors. You can also get a "better" set of the same with more flow matching, for more $$. 1000cc is where you will want to be. You will need an R35 AFM and adapter tube if you want to stay with Nistuned stock ECU. Otherwise, if going Haltech, you can ignore. As for intercooler. Just about anything will do. You're only talking about ~300rwkW. Just put a big core in there. Be aware that return flows do add significant pressure drop and will cost power and will make the turbo work harder to achieve the same goals. If you can manage a proper crossflow, do it. I'm keeping my very good return flow because I'm only expecting to be in the ~250rwkW range, and will live with whatever outcome I get.
    • I have a heap that i have collected if you want some authentic ones still. Pm me if your interested!
×
×
  • Create New...