Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

jap average is around 15k even though for some reason everyone assumes otherwise. This is why it should be assumed that cars are wound back.

If they were such perfect low km examples, they would have been bought by the domestic market, not flogged to overseas customers at the auctions :)

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I paid a good price :)

The car was imported in 2000 with 2,000kms on the clock. That owner had it for 2.5 years and put another 12,000 on it. So yeah - I was lucky. Just like a run-in new car.

I think a lot depends on locality. A lot of people in the Tokyo area only use their cars on the weekend, so a lot of those cars can go 2 or 3 years without putting on any serious K's. Where I am, out in the mountains, there isn't much public transport, everything is spread out and owning/driving a car on a daily basis is just about unavoidable...

in the last 2 years I've owned the car I think I put about 25000 k's on the car. I got it at a cool 40000k's (with books and service manuals from a nissan authorised dealer to back it up) and the servicing was as regular as clockwork too, I think the previous driver was a hot jap babe or sumfin (knowing my luck it'll be a non-milfish mom).

Bought the car 2 1/2 years ago with 42,000 on the clock. The condition of the car and the log books matched the KM stated.

Now it's up to 85,000 and hasn't missed a beat.

Had the front castor rod thingies replaced but that's it.

J

bought it with 65000km, now 96000km. Bought it in july 2001. travelled 200kms a week to work, major problems was the worn front castor bushes and busted stock clutch(what do you expect from 180rwkw@CAS) otherwise a great car. 100000km major service now due along with worn rear tyres.

How much did it cost to get these replaced and what difference if any did you notice after they had been replaced ?

G'day Ben,

I had the same problem. The factory castor rod bushes are filled with some sort of gell/fluid stuff and are prone to leaking.

Mine were picked up at the last wheel alighnment I had done.

I couldn't tell you if there was any handling improvement cause at that stage I went from the JIC coilovers to standard shocks with 25mm lower springs (hence why I got the alighmnet done :D ).

One thing I did notice was that it now has a slight squeak sometimes !

I think the cost was $120 for the parts and about $60 for fitting.

Cheers

J

I had the front bushes replaced in my car and noticed a difference in the turning response. It was a lot quicker and sharper. The stock ones were shot, had tears in them. I got the polyurathane ones (i think thats what they were made of) and they are a lot stiffer than the old ones.

I got mine a bit over 2yrs ago with 62 000k and just tonight clocked over 110 000k, the only problem I have had is the crank case seal went about 6 months ago otherwise perfect. That includes skidpan and track days, many runs down the 1/4 at willowbank and trips to Sydney from Brisbane. Been a great car so far.

Edit: Oh yeah forgot, had to do the caster bushes when I first got the car.

I bought mine with 101 000 on the clock and got the timing belt done. The mechanic said it was its first belt (becuase it was so shagged) so there is a good chance the km's are geniune. Now there is 123 000 ks on the clock. I have driven about 20 000ks in about 8 months, so my new years resoultion is to start catching the bus to work and leave the car at home to keep the ks down.

I also had to get the castor bushes replaced because they were leaking oil. Couldnt notice any handling difference because I only had the car a day when I got the work done.

Other problems with it were the clutch (general wear & tear I'd say) and a couple of exhaust manifold studs missing. Other than that, i think its a healthy RB20.

Changed the plugs a couple of days back (about 30 000ks old) and they seemed to be in pretty good condition (all had the same sort of wear).

/end rant

got it with 89,000kms, have now done 145,000kms..

only problem was the muffler which I replaced it when i first imported it...and just recently somethings shorting out in the steering column causing the indicators to go haywire (still to be fixed).

I bought my '33 with 74,000 on the clock (skeptical), now has 164,000. Only things that have gone wrong is the clutch (it just wore out) and the ECU stopped sending tacho signals, but otherwise worked perfectly?? The only problem with the engine is one lash adjuster seems to be worn so it has a light ticking noise occasionally, but otherwise it's been 100% reliable. I service it every 5,000km -7,500km with full synthetic oil and filters changed etc and treat it with mechanical sympathy, so that's gotta help longevity.

Seems a lot of people have had problems with the radius rod bushes tearing etc. (Just as I did) The mechanic told me when I had mine replaced that they quite often fail by 60,000kms.

Those of u that have replaced them, are u getting the stiffer ones or the stock ones from nissan.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...