Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

for drift simon.. but im keen on the switch!

i just finished tuning a std R33 (PFC, FMIC and EXHAUST), i put it on the dyno and tuned it, then fitted cams and cam gears (vct removed) and lost no power anywhere (on identical boost), here are the graphs. Lots of Cam gear dialing but it was worth the effort. Next mod turbo.

post-34927-1266462779_thumb.jpg

whats this hks3037 everyone talks about? what is it equal to in the garrett range?

I could ask "How was your sleep"? :/

Equilavent to a genuine 3076 but it slightly different in set up, do a search on 3037 = 56vs60 and 72vs 82 HKS vs Garrett etc etc

Good stuff, i'd prefer to call myself skeptic though, but each to their own. :/

I'm happy knowing that I've highlighted your factually incorrect statement.

Nothing worse than misleading users of this forum with blatantly wrong information and claims... Claims like Hub dynos are in RWKW - which are wrong.

ladies ladies.. the curve is the curve so lets all calm ourselves and dry the tears :/ the dyno is a tuning tool not the be all and end all of how fast the car is, we all know 3071s are faster... :cool:

lol this was one of the current informative GT30 threads but it seems to have gone off track a touch :cool: back to it shall we?

The HKS 3037S usually makes around 300rwkw/20psi, with the larger .73 rear.

Now take less boost, smaller rear.

You can see where this is going i'm sure...

Yep, no where.

56T vs 52T comp wheel. Not a true comparison.

May as well say my 3071 makes 285rwkw and Juggernauts makes 290 odd. both have the same trim gt30 turbine and different comp wheels too.

Compressor maps to show the 'signifigant' difference between the two Dave?

You'd expect there to be one by the wording of your post...

So there is nothing worse than all your posts?

I didn't realise this was about me...

Good to see you're still a fan :rofl:

Compressor maps to show the 'signifigant' difference between the two Dave?

You'd expect there to be one by the wording of your post...

ask and you shall receive

the following are the comp maps for GT37 series compressors 56T and 52T

based on 90% VE and calculated at 1.4 bar boost from 3000 to 8000rpm in 1000rpm intervals

the best part is, copy those values into the 3071 map :rofl:

post-43588-1266477173_thumb.jpg

post-43588-1266477181_thumb.jpg

I believe these will come in handy later for people wanting to do the research anyhow.

The HKS 3037S usually makes around 300rwkw/20psi, with the larger .73 rear.

Now take less boost, smaller rear.

You can see where this is going i'm sure...

The .73 rear is a specific HKS ex housing that has a T2 sized inlet flange and GT30 outlet http://www.hksusa.com/categories/more.asp?id=1092, whereas Simons using a Garrett .63 T3 4 bolt rear which has a T3 sized inlet flange and GT30 outlet.

So I'm not sure whether it would be correct to say the HKS T2 .73 is actually larger than the Garrett T3 .63.

Edited by juggernaut1
I have no idea what im looking at with those maps? hahahaha

lol each island indicates a turbos efficiency range, the higher the % the more efficient it is..

idealy you would want a turbo that as your motor spools and revs it passes straight thru the centre island of the map. in this case iv picked max boost (i was conservative as the 1.5 results were far too biased to the smaller comp) then plotted at that boost only to show surge or overheating.

if you cross the edge of the map to the left side the compressor surges, if you cross the right side it starts pumping hot air. both are bad.

Apart from the annoying Garrett scaling... very very interesting Scott.

I can see why when you go the next compressor up how the surging comes about given the 56T is on the borderline :)

Also interesting that the 52T would be fairly well off the map in most scenario's upper RPM's and should fall off...

They are both more or less very similar until upwards of ~7,000rpm

Yet once on the cars it doesn't seem to be the case at all if they make/hold power till 8k without a problem (in the 52t scenario)

That's always made me wonder about some of the maps, never got my head around that part for some reason hehe...

I have no idea what im looking at with those maps? hahahaha

http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=258035

That should help you a bit, it's a little bit "simpler" than the Garrett site if you are wanting a basic/quick run down of whats going on without serious number crunching.

Garrett site is better overall, but you will have to read it a couple of times and think about it :rofl:

Those trims are not exactly comparable (but gives some insight) ..as the 56 trim has a .6 a/r housing and the 52 trim has a .54 a/r.

So you'd expect the 52 trim to flow more in a .6 a/r comp - which incidently are available through GCG. Also the port shrouded 52 trim .6 flows more than the non-port shrouded comp (440 vs 450) according to the HKS specs.

Edited by juggernaut1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
    • There are guys on Facebook under, Infiniti Owners Australia   https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1Z3RbPqx4k/?mibextid=wwXIfr What Whp are you after and I can help, and join this Q group in the states. https://www.facebook.com/share/g/19A59cN3JR/?mibextid=wwXIfr
×
×
  • Create New...