Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I always wanted confirmation on the smallest compressor trim version of the HKS GT3037 and finally found it .

This would be the one that's rated same as the GT2835 56T and likely the Garrett GT3071R though I reckon the larger diameter smaller trim compressor would work better .

Cartridge no 700177-5005 corresponds with turbo number 700382-8 in my HKS parts numbers lists . This turbo is obviously made with a non port shrouded comp cover only , the next number 700382-9 is the non shrouded GT3037 52T and 700382-10 is the GT3037 52T with port shrouded comp cover .

post-9594-1264280456_thumb.jpg

post-9594-1264280485_thumb.jpg

post-9594-1264280523_thumb.jpg

Edited by discopotato03
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/305232-positive-id-on-hks-gt3037-48t/
Share on other sites

Turbos always look strange when you take a closeish shot from that angle . The fella has his thumb over the A/R number but I think it says 0.60 . It's not a T04B housing either .

T04E comp housings always look smaller with the std inlet boss because for memory they are 2 3/4" where the port shrouded one is I think 4" .

The wheel looks a little small at the inducer but the difference between 48/52/56T is 52.8/55/57mm so a whole 4.2mm smallest to largest .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
    • Are you sure the gasket is blown? What are the issues? Thermocure is the only flush I've seen do anything with rust, very impressed with that, Prestone, rust will be by the pool having a cigarette.  
    • And since the flush you have a blown head gasket? Have you lifted the head off yet?
    • The answer is to get a hold of the wiring diagram, work out what voltage is supposed to be where, when, and then work out why it is not there, then. I can't speak to the HR34 stuff, because I have never paid any attention to the NAs. There is a possibility that the turbo diagram will help, but it could also be different - depending on whether there is an FPCM on the NAs.
×
×
  • Create New...