Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Why would this bottom end be ANY different in the way it drives compared to say a Tomei or HKS step 1 or 2? It's the same 2770cc as the rest of then (2738cc for Tomei and 86.5 mm pistons). Nick, your going to have what seems like a nice head to stick ontop of the step zero and thats where the result will come from. Not the stroker kit itself.

Why would this bottom end be ANY different in the way it drives compared to say a Tomei or HKS step 1 or 2? It's the same 2770cc as the rest of then (2738cc for Tomei and 86.5 mm pistons). Nick, your going to have what seems like a nice head to stick ontop of the step zero and thats where the result will come from. Not the stroker kit itself.

Nowhere in my post did I say the Step Zero would drive any different to a Tomei 2.8 or HKS Step 1 or Step 2

I purchased the kit based on real-world results - Pretty simple, in fact the entire setup I am using has been spec'd out precisely for what I want it for.

Wow good call Nick

Good luck with building your setup, hopefully it ends up quicker than your big setup years ago which got spanked by shauns stock turbo'd R32 GTR.

Anyway enough of that-let's see results. If it turns out to be a good crank then great, everyone should buy one and good on you for trying something new.

Come on now Steve, whats with the ninja edit? Are you that childish and spineless you need to resort to such comments then pull your little dig straight away hoping it won't be seen? Very sad.

Now to entertain your comment, was there some sort of race I was part of and never knew? if so please do enlighten me.

I think the way you talk on this forum really leaves a bit to be desired sometimes, you are extremely quick to talk yourself up and talk others down. Unlike you so often do, I haven't talked up what I am doing, rather posted some facts as many are interested in this kit, and stated that while resarching what kit to use the Step Zero was a very attractive option. I am really looking forward to seeing how it performs, not to run my mouth, not to gloat, but because I am keen to continue enjoying my car at the track. My car isn't intended to be a horsepower hero, just a fun all rounder, and yes the HKS Step Zero is something new and fresh to market so it will be very interesting to see if it goes really well, or otherwise.

Time will tell.

Cheers!

Hahaha, that's great, yeah if you've conveniently forgotten when I was in your car and saw it happen - oh well that cant be helped.

I cbf'd arguing, simple as that. I'm not going to resort to insults either.

As I said; Good luck with the build, if it turns out to be good then great - hopefully more people will buy them.

Results/ drive. Same difference.

What turbo's are you using again? I forget.

Im not having a digg Paul, but I don't think i said the Step Zero will provide different results to the alternatives either, rather the specifications that HKS has released for the Step Zero, combined with the results I have seen from cars overseas using the same kit, plus the price point make it seem a very attractive option so I am giving it a shot. I already have a new GT-SS kit sitting around at home so at least for the time being they will be going on so the whole thing should be very responsive, albeit not with massive power unless I eventually switch out the GT-SS's for something bigger (Highly likely)

Seriously Nick, what other motivation could there be other than the dollar factor for choosing this stroker kit over the others mentioned.

On paper it would appear to be an inferior crankshaft to the the other kits mentioned so unless they derive their 2.8 capacity from a slightly different bore stroke combo that is more suitable to your application ...or, You have your lips firmly around the appendage of someone from hks I fail to see how anybody looking to make 600 plus hp could even consider this kit over the likes of the nitto or tomei or the higher specced hks jobs.

Seriously Nick, what other motivation could there be other than the dollar factor for choosing this stroker kit over the others mentioned.

On paper it would appear to be an inferior crankshaft to the the other kits mentioned so unless they derive their 2.8 capacity from a slightly different bore stroke combo that is more suitable to your application ...or, You have your lips firmly around the appendage of someone from hks I fail to see how anybody looking to make 600 plus hp could even consider this kit over the likes of the nitto or tomei or the higher specced hks jobs.

Noel, obviously everyone has their opinion on the kit, and that is great - Nobody will really know how good or otherwise the kit goes until someone has one up and running.

I went for the kit based on the fact it was highly recommended by a well regarded HKS Pro Dealer in Japan, that has built a stack of very quick circuit cars over there using the Step Zero, and to my knowledge none of which have yet found fault nor limitation with the kit itself, all at or over 600PS. I am not an expert but did some of my own research as well following the recommendation and for the price I was able to pick the kit up for thanks to a few contacts, it appears it will deliver what I am after, reliably, at almost half the price of the Nitto 2.7 for example. For what its worth, as far as the whole cost thing goes, I was originally looking at the Tomei kit, but after the Step Zero was suggested to me, and after evaluating what I am planning on using my car for at this point its pretty hard to justify spending (in my case) an extra ~$3k on the crank rods and pistons alone if I was realistically not going to need it. I can't quite see why you are in such disbelief over my choice, its my car, and really no concern of yours whatsoever. Im not making claims or talking it up here, just sharing some info about what direction I am taking on my build, it really is that simple. If you don't like the kit, move along and leave this thread for those that are interested in it and want to know more.

By posting it on a public forum you made it a concern of every body who cares to read it.

Dont misinterpret what i said. I for one hope it works above and beyond. Its about time something reasonably priced came from japan. Given they manufacture bugger all and just rebrand other well known products Then add the jap tax.

its about time something like this came along.

wow, this thread got spicy. no need for the digs guys. nick is just sharing his build like everyone else and hasn't had anything negative to say about anyone else's product or set-up.

it makes perfect sense to me. he was simply saying that apart from the fact it's cheaper than all the other set-ups he has also seen excellent results from tuners using this gear in japan for cars that are far outside the parameters listed in the HKS spec sheet (GTSS, mild power, low rpm use). He's talking cars with bigger turbos, 600+ps, circuit use etc. if it can stand up to that it would make sense that for someone like Nick who wants it for a road car with small turbines it's going to be more than capable. and given the cost of buying a new nissan crank, some rods and pistons is the same (if not more) than the HKS kit it made good sense to give it a try.

I want to see how much power he can push from GTSS. I was planning to do it myself till I got sidetracked and went with Jun/Tomei stroker and 2530s. my plan was high revving 2.6, headwork to get more power per psi of boost (sacrificing a little response which I figured was fine considering the small turbos), match port everything on both exhaust and inlet, all alloy hard piping, big tomei dumps, twin 70mm front pipes into single 100mm exhaust, so basically no restrictions anywhere to allow the turbos to breathe as well as they could then wind it up past 25psi and see just whether or not 350kw was possible from them. Basically all the little 1% gains you can do that most people don't bother with. my hope was all of that stuff together would get me there but I really don't know.

and given the cost of buying a new nissan crank, some rods and pistons is the same (if not more) than the HKS kit it made good sense to give it a try.

Exactly what I was thinking and is why I think this kit is such a great alternative. I certainly hope to build a 2.8 in the future and with a mortgage and a child price will play a big part, hence why this would be my choice.

So in short this is a much cheaper 2.8 alternative that has a proven record with tuners in Japan. Correct??

Like Nick said to people who don't like the kit and think it is not a great idea, move along.

Is there any real benefit to a 2.8 kit. a 26 will bore to 2.7 so it seems like an awful lot of coin to tip in for an extra 100cc's ?

Its the stroke increase. Yes its only 4 mm, but they drive so much better.

You'll have to pardon my ignorance here, What is the standard 26 bore ?

The line of questioning is going down the path to ascertain if a 2.8 kit could be punched out to 2.9 or thereabouts which would go as neas as hell to giving you the 3 litre without the grief.

So these 2.8 stroker kits are built on a standard bore ?

STD 73.7 mm stroke, 86 mm bore

Tomei 77.7 mm stroke, 86.5 mm bore (2738 cc), 87 mm bore (2770cc), 87.5 mm bore (2802cc)

HKS 77.7 mm stroke, 87 and 87.5 mm bore

You get the idea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thing I'd be doing, is pulling it out, and just getting the tune cleaned up for now. Before that even happens, checking over everything, like vac hoses, fuel hoses, etc. No point dropping thousands on sensors if the moment you start it back up all the oil leaks out, or it has massive vacuum leaks etc.   But really, to know what to do, depends on what your use case is. Hard core track car? Throw most sensors available at it. Street car, I'd probably just run oil pressure, oil temps, water pressure, water temp, probably fuel pressure too. I don't know exactly what the Link can handle and do with those though. And if it's mainly just to cruise the streets, rather than mountain runs, you can probably skip most of the above if you've already got them in as gauges and warning lights.   PS, inb4 "sell it and buy a modern sportscar"
    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
×
×
  • Create New...