Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys & gals,

I'm getting an issue with my 34GTR where the 4WD and A-LSD warning lights are coming on the dash and the car is only running RWD.

It was thought that the PowerFC was faulty and the cause of the issues and so the stock ECU was put back in the car last week.

The issue seemed to go away and all was good until two days ago it started happening again.

So it seems the PowerFC wasn't the issue and now I'm hoping people here can help me diagnose the problem!

Things to note:

- I usually find out if the car will be 4WD or RWD when I first start the car. The light either comes on or doesn't come on within the first 2 seconds of starting the car.

- If it comes on then I can turn the car off and start it again until it doesn't come on.

- I've noticed that if I start the car and give it a bit of revs, then it doesn't happen.

- Sometimes in traffic when I decide to turn on the A/C or rear demister or even the headlights, it makes the 4WD/A-LSD light come on and then the car is in RWD again.

Battery is brand new, fitted 8 days ago, no voltage issues that I can see.

Does anyone have an Electronics Parts Guide that I can see the sensors to check?

Hoping to get to the bottom of this, it's frustrating :P

Thanks guys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

based on what youve told us so far id say TPS could be a likely culprit

both systems need the TPS signal (even at 0km/h) to run and pass diagnostics

if TPS is unplugged, broken, out of range, then the system fails and the lights come on

the TPS signal comes from the throttle body sensor

then runs into the main ECU harness into the main ECU

from here the ECU relays the same TPS signal onto another wire, which runs to the boot

and feeds into the 4WD/A-LSD computers. check the wire # on the engine wiring looms

ive seen my TPS go out of range and cause my A-LSD to fail like yours does

a known fix that I have seen (like yours) is to mash the accel pedal a few times

this manages to clear the out of range TPS signal and return it to normal state

TPS should 0.35v ish at idle (ie nothing on the pedal)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Paul,

I had a feeling it could be that.. the throttle sensor display has been rather irratic on the MFD (when I hold constant throttle at say 20% throttle, the display shows it jumping between 18-22% whereas if I hold the throttle at a constant in the TPS calibration, it stays steady)

Trent down at Status Tuning said that he was getting a TPS error code but when we ordered a new TPS from Nissan and put that in, it didn't have any changed effect?

So you mean try mashing the accelerator pedal when in idle or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

check the actual wiring of it

with mine

if i boot the car up and drive around shortly after TPS goes to 0.00v

A-LSD and SLIP fail and the engine revs to 1500rpm and stays there (as it panics because TPS is dead)

so i turn the car off, mash the accel pedal a few times (to quickly open/close the throttle body) and then re-start the car and it's fine

if youve replaced the sensor, i would check the wiring

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • 6 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
×
×
  • Create New...