Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Back in the day, you can drive a manual car with an Auto license as long as you're a full.................but that got change also a while ago (god i'm an old kunt) so basically if you've got your Auto license after the year 19something then you can't drive a manual vehicle.

Then you can fight it then.

Sitting in the seat doesnt mean a lot

Course it does. It's intention to drive the vehicle. Same thing when you are tanked up on alcohol. If you are sitting in the drivers seat you can get done for drink driving

Only if the keys are in the ignition - proving intent :D

Sleeping in your car drunk with the keys in the glovebox or something does not show intent.

It's still arguable in a court of law is the point.

Back in the day, you can drive a manual car with an Auto license as long as you're a full.................but that got change also a while ago (god i'm an old kunt) so basically if you've got your Auto license after the year 19something then you can't drive a manual vehicle.

Intersting... I had no idea they changed the rules. Lucky I got my manual licence when I was learning :D

Only if the keys are in the ignition - proving intent :D

Sleeping in your car drunk with the keys in the glovebox or something does not show intent.

It's still arguable in a court of law is the point.

That's true but the police would have used their own judgment. A guy that is alone with a girl, who is too youg to even have her licence. I don't think they had a doubt in their mind who drove the car there.

who is too young to even have her licence

:P

on topic.. i would fight it, as implausible as it sounds you may have just been waiting near/in the car for a friend

no use giving in when they don't have the smoking gun so to speak

That's true but the police would have used their own judgment. A guy that is alone with a girl, who is too youg to even have her licence. I don't think they had a doubt in their mind who drove the car there.

Look - you know more about the situation, and with every post a bit more info comes out.

How is anyone going to give solid advice if it's taken nearly 2 pages to get the facts?

screw it all. auto manual... pshhh bicycle is where its at. just finishing putting an external on it now with every pedal i let off a roar of 140db's. watch out eastlink bike path

screw it all. auto manual... pshhh bicycle is where its at. just finishing putting an external on it now with every pedal i let off a roar of 140db's. watch out eastlink bike path

Dude now all you need to do is buy one or two of these babies!! TurboSpoke. Forget the ol' footy cards in teh spokes trick, thats for n00bs lol

Back in the day, you can drive a manual car with an Auto license as long as you're a full.................but that got change also a while ago (god i'm an old kunt) so basically if you've got your Auto license after the year 19something then you can't drive a manual vehicle.

Not true. The automatic condition is not there when you get a full license.

yeah im old too. I remember when you got an auto lic you could only drive an auto vehicle. Not sure where it stands now, but I think if you have an auto lic unless you pass a manual lic test you shouldnt be able to drive a manual.

Its a very different way of driving and some extra skill is really required.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, the advent of canbus was supposed to cut down on wiring weight, then some bright marketing wonk says "oh, look at all these wonderful tech gadgets we can cram in here now that we have this wonderous technology" and some arsehole safety legislator says "oh, look at all the wonderful surveillance and tracking gadgets we can cram in here now that we have this wonderous technology" and some dipshit young engineer who has grown up thinking that an extra 500000 lines of code is not a problem because storage is cheap these days says "oh look at all this wonderful shit I can do to one up those dipshit arsholes over at VW" and the Karens of the world all go "oh look at all these fancy things I can do on my screen (so long as I am not driving on a bumpy road wherein touch screens immediately become the single most stupid shit idea ever shoveled into a car) and my 19 zone airconditioning keeps my sweaty fat folds a bit less damp and the windows close themselves because I'm too fat and lazy to wind them up for myself and these reversing sensors would have been great if I'd paid attention to them instead of smashing them on the bollard while I was reversing and staring fixedly forward that day I went to pick up little Charlize from ballet" and the sweaty mongoloids who say "oh this wonderful collision avoidance technology with these 45 excellent radar antennae scattered across the front of my car mean I can tailgate like a methed up tradie at full speed with no fear because the car and the 35 airbags will protect me if it all goes wrong" ...... </shallistopranting?>
    • There's a post from a member (can't recall who), went down the path of a twin scroll G30-660 and it's doing over 300kW+ AND comes on about the same as a high flow RB25DET turbo. Have your cake and eat it too in this case. TBH, if I had a 2nd chance of building my car again (i.e. someone gave me what I wanted for my shit box, but the deal was I had to re-build another R33 and keep the change) I would just pop in a stock NEO motor (with new seals, rod bearings, ARP studs, head gasket, sump, Nitto pump), get a smaller twin scroll turbo, modify the stock low mount (keep the divider in place), and make a solid 300kW on 98RON and call it a day. 
    • It's all the sound deadening, and extra shit piled into them, plus all the extra (even though it's thinner) material for crumple zones. I can't fathom in modern cars why they need canbus to the headlights, and why the headlights must be vin coded on some cars to the ECU, BCM, and security module! Especially when they claim it's for security, yet, the canbus at the headlights let's thieves steal the car in minutes, so even more cars are being stolen! The Mercedes Sprinter 907 vans. They're a huge van, but a "basic" van. Yet they have that many canbus networks, plus two Lin networks, AND an Ethernet network. Logging a single network alone of 8 byte data frames, and they will generate a 20mb log file in 5 minutes. That's one network, and I can't remember the exact amount, but there's over 10 full CAN2.0B networks in them. I'm not a fan of modern cars, oddly, more and more I hate DBW, and all the bullshittery the cars try and interfere with. But all that bullshittery adds weight, plus crazy regulations on crumple zones, plus, ever picked a modern seat up, half of them have like 4 electric motors in them and will weigh 30+kg each. Then all the motors for things like adjustable steering columns blah blah blah. And did I mention the sound deadening so you can even hear an ambulance right behind you even if you 7.2surround sound is off?
    • Ah ok, yeah it should be flat, I believe the r34 battery tray has these 3 bumps in them they makes it line up and everything is flat, don't see how it would tilt if everything is secured.
    • Agreed it actively wants to kill you which I love driving fast cars slow is my stick
×
×
  • Create New...