Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Even with the emulator you still need the tuning software to drive it otherwise you are just working in hex!

TunerPro is the only other software which works with moates for Nissans but has no user support and doesnt have integrated consult/logging capability. btw Nistune software drives the Moates and Romulator emulators

We have found that most workshops would rather work with the boards than tune with emualtors since they are plug and play similar similar to FLASH units Trent was mentioning. As I mentioned R32/Z32 are the few ones which can do this without additional hardware. Older ECUs dont have consult and newer ones require some type of daughterboard regardless

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

you can get a burner/emulator combo for a few hundred bucks if you want to tune live. should work out slightly cheaper than a nistune, which isnt so good if its for a single car, but might be an option you hsould look into trent

sorry i should have been clearer, i was talking from a customer point.

Say you tune it with std afm then make a change to a Z32 then you need to use an emulator (and software) to set it up then burn the changes.... then the customer upgrades the turbo and the process starts again.

With nistune we charge for the first tune then any upgrades the customer makes down the track are charged per HR not as another entire tune which is usually charged with eeproms as it is labour intensive. With nisune you just plug into the consult port and tune.

Guess I'm more comfortable working in hex and flashing EEPROMs from my uni days. Its not that hard to erase and reprogram anyways, just use a baby bottle steriliser to erase and start again.

Emulator + Hex Editor + serial programmer = oldschool.

Yeah its not hard to erase and reprogram once you know how. Thats where I started about eight years ago when first using ROM Editor and LiveEdit. Have you used Nistune at all? You can download and use trial for name/email. It basically overlays the hex with human readable parameters.

Its much easier to change K constant on the fly using up/down arrows to change live and then monitoring your AFRs and injection time etc to see the effects of the changes

Wish I still had my RB20 Mines ECU so I could sell it to some chump for $250 :)

a mate had one on his RB20 NICS motor, oldest I've seen, worked an absolute treat for what it was. I've also seen a silvertop Impul ECU work tops on said motor. That's about the limit of my experiences with them, guess sometimes you just luck out with some that have been tuned for lower octane fuel properly.

Do you charge a flat rate for an initial Nistune job Trent?

Wish I still had my RB20 Mines ECU so I could sell it to some chump for $250 :)

a mate had one on his RB20 NICS motor, oldest I've seen, worked an absolute treat for what it was. I've also seen a silvertop Impul ECU work tops on said motor. That's about the limit of my experiences with them, guess sometimes you just luck out with some that have been tuned for lower octane fuel properly.

Do you charge a flat rate for an initial Nistune job Trent?

yes, we spend alot of time on them too, way too many people just get loaded from car to car and run on the dyno.

GTR's are probably one of my favorite cars to tune nowadays with the nistune gear, i reccomend the nistune over the PFC anyday on alow mount sub 400awkw GTR. I still like my D-jetro pfc for the challenging big cam cars but the nistune is pretty damn hard to beat as a drive in drive out solution.

Sam (DRDRIFT) out west is also another remap champion.

Yeah I am quite intrigued by Nistune, I've been banging on about it to a couple of mates who were going to tread the same path as everyone else with their NEO motors and go PFC, which seems to me to be a bit overkill for a street motor. I have noticed that you and DrDrift seem to be the people in the know in Melbourne for them!

Pity there's no R33 Rb25 Nistune avalible, the market would be cornered then IMO

This also just crossed my mind - would it be possible to pull an image off a japanese tuning house ECU and then to put it onto a Z32 ECU running nistune?

I'm also curious about how there is obviously variations in the JDM ecu's when it comes to how the original tune has been set (I've never seen a Kakimoto ECU before though!)

Edited by bozodos

I got one (2nd one i bought after i went PFC and sold it and went back to MINES ECU).

This is my second one, highly recommend it. My opinion.

f**k paying for bullshit tunes and getting some shit kicker telling you how your engine is tired, set up not good enough, etc etc all excuses not to get power out of it and spend more money. Best bang for buck.

For all those people who say the usual that MINES leans out your car, thanks for your opinion, but no thanks. ill trust the DYNO sheet. With basic mods, exhaust, cooler, pod, (stock turbo) 208KW and most importantly great to drive... i beg to differ.

On the other hand you can buy a PFC (1200+)

And tune which costs 500+ but somehow always ends up more (1550+ my case)

** plus other expenses, ill take the basic mods and MINES ecu.

image026.th.jpg

How do you know the Mines chip/tune has not been altered/fiddled with since it was done?

Oh wait... You don't. :)

Therefore all you are doing is taking a gamble with your motor based on nothing more than a guess.

There is no "other side" to the argument. There are to many risks, to many variables all for the sake of being a tightass :(

If you are going to get a Mines ECU, you are better off sticking with the factory one. At least it'll shutdown via rich/retard.

How do you know the Mines chip/tune has not been altered/fiddled with since it was done?

Oh wait... You don't. :D

As far as i know you cant alter them. If there is someone that can, let me know, i wouldnt mind looking into it. Last time i check with Sam (Dr drift) he said you cant tune MINES ecu.

Therefore all you are doing is taking a gamble with your motor based on nothing more than a guess.

You are taking a gamble if you tune it anyway. Everything is a gamble to some extent.

There is no "other side" to the argument. There are to many risks, to many variables all for the sake of being a tightass :down:There sure is. Not about being tightass, i tried PFC etc and i prefer this.

If you are going to get a Mines ECU, you are better off sticking with the factory one. At least it'll shutdown via rich/retard.

And no your not, with factory ecu you struggle to run 12 psi, doesn't run properly or anywhere near as hard. Now it runs more smoothly, has much better top end. No limiter and more aggressive tune to it.

ANYWAY, there is always to sides to the coin. That was all my opinion and experience so far.

For all those people who say the usual that MINES leans out your car, thanks for your opinion, but no thanks. ill trust the DYNO sheet. With basic mods, exhaust, cooler, pod, (stock turbo) 208KW and most importantly great to drive... i beg to differ.

On the other hand you can buy a PFC (1200+)

And tune which costs 500+ but somehow always ends up more (1550+ my case)

** plus other expenses, ill take the basic mods and MINES ecu.

image026.th.jpg

why was that run done in 3rd? its not quite right.

As far as i know you cant alter them. If there is someone that can, let me know, i wouldnt mind looking into it. Last time i check with Sam (Dr drift) he said you cant tune MINES ecu.

Yes you cant modify the ECU because there is epoxy over their chips to prevent removal. But you can download the maps from the MINES ECU and view them, change them and put into another ECU if you really wanted do. If the AFRs are fine for your car then great, from what I have seen the MINES chips dont change them much from factory anyway

As far as the PFC goes it all depends how the tuner maps it. You could map in the MINES tune to the PFC or Nistune if you really wanted to. Doesnt matter either way... but with that MINES ECU you are stuck with that tune with that ECU and no way to adjust it further, even remapping to another EPROM chip. The ECUs are useless because of that inflexibility, especially if you go the way of upgrading injectors/AFM

Therefore all you are doing is taking a gamble with your motor based on nothing more than a guess.

You are taking a gamble if you tune it anyway. Everything is a gamble to some extent.

Taking a ECU with a generic map or even specifically programmed map with no idea of the boost which the fuel and timing maps were programmed to is more of a gamble than tuning a vehicle and knowing what injection time and timing you are appling into the ECU at each RPM and load point and watching the feedback of the AFRs and listening for knock whilst doing that.

We find that most of these mail order ECUs will play it safe with the tune meaning most times it could be better optimised

For all those people who say the usual that MINES leans out your car, thanks for your opinion, but no thanks. ill trust the DYNO sheet. With basic mods, exhaust, cooler, pod, (stock turbo) 208KW and most importantly great to drive... i beg to differ.

On the other hand you can buy a PFC (1200+)

And tune which costs 500+ but somehow always ends up more (1550+ my case)

** plus other expenses, ill take the basic mods and MINES ecu.

image026.th.jpg

Its pretty obvious that the Mines ship HAS leaned out your car compared to the 9.5:1 the stocker can go down to.

ye I was under the impression that you were meant to buy certain MINES products to go with the ECU lol.

What I'm getting at is the potential of a MINES map to be used on a Nistune ECU as a basemap until the owner has the chance to get it tuned properly.

if you check the original packaging that comes with the MINES ECU, there's usually a list of mods that are recommended like intake, exhaust etc.

you can also take the serial number off the gold plate and email mines directly and they will give you the details of the ecu.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...