Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ive seen the effects of using less octaned fuel..

ive ran 95 for a couple weeks and didnt notice much difference but decided to run 98 to be safe..

a friend on the other hand, used 91 in his sr20det and after a few weeks had big problems with lag, backfiring, and idling really rough..

why have a performance car if you dont want to look after it? its a price we gotta pay.

Sorry Mad RON is RON in whatever country you are in. We used to test RON with a variable compression motor, now it is an IR reading and other hi tech stuff. Mixing 92 and 110 will give about a 100-101 RON so it's ok but levelride I though your fuel would have been cheap enough .

You need to take the cheep fuel out of your tank to get your car going. Skylines cannot have this crap fuel in them unless all the seals in the fuel system have been changed too handle these types of fuel.

The fuel is simply 98octane if the car is set too run stock fuel. What has happened as when you were driving with the cheap fuel in there the seals in the fuel system have swolen up and restricted fuel flow. Thats why you slowly got power loss and when you came too idle the drop in fuel pressure was enough for the fuel supply too cut off and stall the car.

I have seen this exact problem you are describing many times with skylines and a 300zx so i can say go ahead too fix it

Ok so being the noob I am, I've been running 91 octane (Shell or Caltex) for the past 9 months in my car. Idles fine, no misfiring etc. Isn't a rocket, but still felt ok to me performance wise. After being told a few days ago I should be running BP Ultimate 98, I've since done over 500kms with this fuel. Car certainly likes it alot better :), and my gas mileage has gotten way better. Havn't noticed any black soot either on my exhaust. But then again I've only done 500km so far with this fuel.

Have I done any lasting damage to my car by running 91? I knew not to run that E10 rubbish, but figured the different octane levels were for performance only, and not the health and well being of the car.

Sorry Mad RON is RON in whatever country you are in. We used to test RON with a variable compression motor, now it is an IR reading and other hi tech stuff. Mixing 92 and 110 will give about a 100-101 RON so it's ok but levelride I though your fuel would have been cheap enough .

sorry mate but i never said RON did i? i said octane (not quite the same thing). and if you do a bit of research you will find that the US octane ratings ARE different to ours because we go off the RON rating and america goes off (RON + MON)/2. and since the MON rating is generally about 8 less than the RON rating (but not always), when you add the 2 together and then halve it it comes out about 4 less than the RON rating.

RON = Research Octane Number

MON = Motor Octane Number

as for fuel being cheap in america, that is somewhat true, but you also have to remember that the minimum wage there is about half of what it is here.

Ok so being the noob I am, I've been running 91 octane (Shell or Caltex) for the past 9 months in my car. Idles fine, no misfiring etc. Isn't a rocket, but still felt ok to me performance wise. After being told a few days ago I should be running BP Ultimate 98, I've since done over 500kms with this fuel. Car certainly likes it alot better :), and my gas mileage has gotten way better. Havn't noticed any black soot either on my exhaust. But then again I've only done 500km so far with this fuel.

Have I done any lasting damage to my car by running 91? I knew not to run that E10 rubbish, but figured the different octane levels were for performance only, and not the health and well being of the car.

there isn't anything wrong with E10 fuels. i've been running it for a few years now, in various cars, as have others i know, without any troubles at all. generally people who have trouble with it aren't actually having trouble with the fuel but the cleaning properties that the fuel has and it breaks down a lot of the garbage in the fuel tank or the fuel filter and it gets deposited in the injectors. this is normally in cars where the fuel filter hasn't been replaced for a few years and is probably full of crap and not filtering very well anyway. very few people have had issues caused by the fuel itself.

as for performance of different fuels, there is actually very little difference in the actual fuel as far as how much performance it gives you. where the performance comes into it is from the octane rating, which is how hard it is to ignite. the higher the octane rating, the harder it is to ignite, so the more advanced timing you can run. on most modern cars the engine has knock sensors which register any pinging and then retard the timing to save the engine from damage. so if you run a car on the lower octane fuel that was designed for higher octane fuel on lower octane fuel then the ecu will retard the timing and you will have less power, meaning you have to use more accelerator (and therefore more fuel) to accelerate or even just cruise at a fixed speed. that is how you are able to get better fuel economy from higher octane fuels. but if you take a basic car that is designed to run on basic fuel you often won't see any gains from running higher octane fuels.

as for any damage you may have done, if the knock sensors aren't working properly, or the engine is still getting pinging once the ecu retards the timing then it can damage spark plugs or ringlands.

We do actually use a RON and MON in Australia. It's just in the oil industry we use RON for simplicity. Before our 98 RON was released ,years of blending and dyno work was done to get the MON up to a high level. As you know MON is more of a driveabilty scale than RON. Research Octane Number is a comparison of the Platformate or Reformate [or what process is used in Catalytic Reforming to in crease the octane of the HSR ]to N-Heptene scale. The reformate or platformate leaves the units and goes to a Ben sat unit to remove the benzene down to levels mandated by govts. Heavy runs to tankage at around 102-105 RON and the lights go a reactor for conversion of the benzene. All these streams and other rundowns go to the blend tank for testing of RON and MON before release to the public. I can't go into specifics as the blending is proprietory knowledge. Obviously in Queensland all or nearly all your gaso comes from Caltex Lytton or BP Bulwar . A small amount may be imported .or in times of shortage or production problems from Caltex Kurnell or Shell Clyde. Though you may get some from India or SE Asia.

you are still ignoring the fact that US octane ratings will always be about 4 octane lower than here. it is common knowledge and has been for about the past god knows how many years. the fuel companies may still us MON when testing fuel, however when it comes to saying what octane their fuel is the simple say what RON it is. you may have a good knowledge of australian fuels, but you seem to have little knowledge about other countries octane ratings.

a prime example of this would be any cars shipped to th US designed to run on premium fuels would have dramatically lower power outputs if the US octane was actually only 92 RON for the premium fuel. the manufacturers would have to detune all the cars, and infact all cars, not just cars designed to run on premium would have to be detuned. yet they all seem to have the same power outputs and don't get detuned.

I guess that as this started as an australian fuel thread , australian RON was main thread ,until level ride, came in with north american octane. since they use AKI as their basis of their octane figure . Still mixing the lower and the higher octane together you will get an improvement on the lower one. 50/50 would give a very close to mid range of the difference. Yes their ECU would be retuned for the differing fuel specs over here, though there isn't a great number of american cars coming this way compared to cars from SE Asia who use a rating the same of very close to ours. But back to australian octane per the thread, on our cars with closed loop systems with knock sensors you will get more power from the higher RON and noticable at that. so use the highest RON you can afford. Interestingly , the sales of 95 ron are up due to govt mandating E 10 with the phasing out of 91. I hope I have a passing knowledge of Australian fuels and manufacture as I have been making it for long enough.

  • 3 weeks later...

depends on what mods you have. if your car is completely stock then you could get away with it, but 98 is the better option. if you are running higher boost or aftermarket ecu (that was tuned on 98) then you'll want to stick with 98. unfortunately that is just one of the many ways that owning a turbo import will empty your wallet.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's something we all have to consider as time marches on. Also consider lifted rally MX5 conversion at that point.
    • I should be fine for a few more years, whilst I do have arthritis I also exercise and do mobility training every day to keep as fit and healthy as I can, military life, which is the actual cause of most of my joint issues, has set daily regimes, which I weirdly enjoy I also train alot smarter now, not really focusing on lots strength or puffy muscles, I'm more focused on maintaining what I have for my future older self, I actually train as much mobility now as I do exercising Check out this "simple" drill I have been doing daily prior to training now for a while now, this has worked wonders in my all round mobility   
    • I'd say one thing that may make you sell is the same reason the guy with the hard top roof sold his. He got old, and his back was giving him too much grief stopping him getting in and out... Old guy said he was 73! He looked and sounded younger than 73 to me! Or maybe I'm just aligning with old people more...
    • Already looked at a few prior to getting the MX5, really nice car, had all the mod cons, but I wasn't really sold on the new "look" I did miss my 2017 Limited, and I personally prefer the "look" of the older car over the new model, but, when pondering I kept going back looking at MX5's But it was same same for the new ND's, I wasn't sold on the new "look", especially the RF with its weird roof, which only half goes down, like a targa top sort of thing As I stated before, I did look at NC's, but the cars I looked at were PRHT's, but I didn't like their roof line "look" of the PRHT, until I saw the soft top version, (someone on SAU posted a for sale ad for one with a soft top that caught my attention, you can blame them for my choice.....🤣) and.... that old style detachable hard tops were available for them, which keeps the old MX5 more smoother flowing roof line, and the more rounded body style, similar to the NA-NB, to me, the arse end of the ND looks to "modern" Much like how I prefer the NC1 front bar, over the later models How long will I keep this car for is unknown, but currently, there's nothing else out there that "floats my boat" for a small, fun, little "sports car", that I can play with and enjoy looking at and driving But, who knows what the future holds, and going off current new car styling, if I replace it, it will be a older model something something       
    • looking forward to your t56 swap man its a game changer if it works! 
×
×
  • Create New...