Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Currently I dont even have an muffler on my 3" system, but I do have the original 2" 'double exhaust' muffler.

Would it be a good idea to put the 2" muffler on the 3" system, the flang's match up and everything, im just worried about the exhaust flow being restricted, plus the exhaust is a double barrel so there would be a bit of added turblance in the muffler.

Just looking for some advice.

I can post pictures if it helps.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306641-2-muffler-on-a-3-system/
Share on other sites

Ok well Ive put the 2" muffler on and its running ok, and for some reason a bit smoother, its certainly not stalling when pulling up to intersections when the engines cold like it was before. At least it seems that way for now.

The only issue is the sound, its considerably quieter, which is good I guess cause the cops wont nag me as much, but I wouldnt mind it being a bit louder/deeper... :P

Im just wondering if this 2" muffler setup could be a issue for the engine, which could be tuned for a 3" system? Im not sure..

This is how it was before, just a simple, defectable, pipe:

under001.th.jpg

Now with the 2" muffler: (I believe this is the stock muffler?)

undernew.th.jpg

And this is a future 3" inlet muffler with 4" cannon on the back, Im hoping to put it on to get a more desired sound, but needs a flange welded onto it which was cut off for the pipe in the first pic before I can attach it.

under3rd.th.jpg

Edited by LexDelta

It shouldn't really make that much of a difference with back pressure but personally id just wait till you can fit the 3" muffler correctly and not worry about the 2"

Its strange that the 2" muffler you have (if its stock like you say) already has a 3" flange???

the flange probably isn't 3", but it probably bolts up. when i got my 33 it had a 3" front pipe bolted to a 2.5" cat bolted to a 2" catback. then before i get a new cat i had a 3.5" catback system bolted to that 2.5" cat. generally all the bolt holes are pretty close

the flange probably isn't 3", but it probably bolts up. when i got my 33 it had a 3" front pipe bolted to a 2.5" cat bolted to a 2" catback. then before i get a new cat i had a 3.5" catback system bolted to that 2.5" cat. generally all the bolt holes are pretty close

Yes thats exactly right, the flange's match up, even tho the pipes are different diameter.

Im glad its not something that will cause any major problems, but I will keep the deathly quiet 2" on for a bit while I work on getting to the 3".

Thanks for all the feedback, if anyone else has concerns it would be good to hear!

Edited by LexDelta

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...