Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My dump gasket has gone and 4 of the bolts have vibrated off, so I thought Id put a split dump pipe on

The turbine outlet is quite smaller as it is split,   This will obviously bring boost on faster but sacrificing top end flow

I believe they split them to stop the pulsing of the gases out of wastegate interrupting the flow of the turbine outlet

Are they a worthwile upgrade, or only for response and midrange

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306907-split-dump-pipe-opinions-wanted/
Share on other sites

i dont believe there is any response gain by using a split dump

when the gate is closed, it is closed and nothing comes out, so the size is irrelevant

its only relevant when the gate is open

the split dump reduces the turbulance by ensuring they each have their own seperate paths

having the turbocharger outlet hole going into the size of the split dump dump (if that makes sense) or runnign to a 3" bell mouth, i dont believe there would be any different in response

they both must travel through the smallest common denominator, which is the exhaust wheel outlet first

  paulr33 said:
i dont believe there is any response gain by using a split dump

Whenever u change the size of a pipe,  

bigger pipe=more flow at top end and reduced flow(air speed) down low.

smaller pipe= increased flow at low rpm  while being restrictive in the top end.

3 inch pipe will flow say 500hp.

Where two 1.5 inch pipes will flow 500hp will alot faster air speed and alot better response

^ I don't know where you get your advice from mate, but it's horribly incorrect.

Bigger pipe down NOT reduce down low torque. Infact it increases it by allowing the gases/air to move around more freely - so long as the motor is tuned accordinly of course.

  R31Nismoid said:
^ I don't know where you get your advice from mate, but it's horribly incorrect.

Bigger pipe down NOT reduce down low torque. Infact it increases it by allowing the gases/air to move around more freely - so long as the motor is tuned accordinly of course.

So putting a bigger exhaust on ur car will have the same response as stock,    Not a chance

So ur saying a bigger pipes air speed velocity at low rpm is the same as a smaller sized pipe.   Not a chance

The smaller the pipe, the greater the air speed velocity will be, until it gets restrictive, where it robs u of top end

Edited by Dorifta

You're first post is wrong, as Paul has stated.

Have a look @ the turbine inlet housing, then perhaps you might appreciate what happens after the turbine wheels doesn't mean a whole lot in the situation you are talking about here.

The sheer fact of the matter is, you are not right. My own car is a testament to this.

Having gone from large, 2.5" twin aftermarket dumps, BACK to factory, with exact same results. It was if i never changed parts.

Not only is my own car a great example, but the 1,000's of other cars on this forum as well.

If you think you need backpressure in the exhaust to make low end power/torque... then i'm throwing in the towel before this goes any further.

So whatever you reckon mate - i'm not going to argue with you if you think you are right as i have proof, you have a theory.

N/A cars don't need it either. Issue is the same there as i said earlier.

People put exhausts on, and don't have the car retuned.

So the N/A feels sluggish all of a sudden as the car is setup/tuned for emissions and straw sized exhausts.

One thing is for sure the bigger the dump pipe and exhaust on a turbo car the better. Less restriction means turbo spools up quicker increasing response, decreasing lag and also increases top end. Its better in every way.

I have heard of people putting larger exhausts on an N/A car and saying they lost a bit of down low torque but gained mid range and top end. Although I am no expert on that so will leave it there.

As said by paulr33, the split dump will not help with response but will help top end flow. How much I do not know. Surely someone has done a back to back dyno.

Edited by Harey

1. To present the greatest difference in pressure across the turbos' turbine (to make it work the best), you want to have zero backpressure after the turbine. Bigger is usually better, but you also want to limit changes in cross sectional area.

2. Split dumps should help when the wastegate is closed as well, due to their ability to limit turbulence just downstream of the turbo. Turbulence = backpressure.

3. Split dumps are much more sensitive to sizing than bellmouths. With Bellmouths you can pretty much bolt any dump to any turbo and it should work fine. With splits you need to take some care.

^^ that's all theory. Reality may be different.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...