Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i need some advice on my setup currently

here are the mods

completey stock rb25 motor

hypergear GT3582 turbo anti surged slotted

50mm external wastegate

740cc injectors

Link G1 ecu

walbro intank pump

stock fuel regulator

splitfire coilpacks

now with the turbo exhaust side i re used my kkr .69 housing which has been modified to suit 50mm gate off it.

I got the car tuned 2 weeks ago and made 400atw on 1.3 bar boost

The dumpipe currently on the car is a 2.75" vband cast iron thing u get from otomoto which then connects to 3" front pipe thru to gutted cat and 3" xforce canon

What i wanna know is basically the car is very laggy, im not seeing 1.3 bar boost until 5000-5500rpm, even between gear changes it will lagg if i dont slam gears to build boost back up.

Could i do something to bring this on harder/sooner? bigger dumpipe? adjustable exh cam gear?

any advice would be great thanks guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/307181-need-some-advice/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

haha cant flatshift man syncros are on there way out to 8 test n tunes will do that :laugh:

nismoid, that i mite try, u mean just take off the vacum line and see how fast it builds boost hmmm i think link is set 21psi boost cut so should be fine

i think he is referring to the map based ecu cutting ignition @ anything over 21psi. so as long as it is tuned with enough tolerance for that much boost it should be o.

Does your wastegate have any preload adjustment? mine with no extra preload would quickly ramp to 15psi and then slowly edge its way to ~19psi @ 5500-6000. wind some preload into the gate and boost ramps up to 19 around 3500

Edited by TiTAN

Which kkr turbo was the housing off? FWIW i made 327rwkw on a 3582 .63 @ 18psi on a stock 26, but for the power i felt it was slow to make boost/had a high boost threashold, but was not laggy between gearchanges.

Edited by Adriano

From KKR's website it says its a .69 Turbine. But who knows. Still, 400rwhp on a fully stock Rb25 at 18psi is not bad.

The size of the turbo is just too big for fast response. Sale that and get them to make you a GT3071 equivalent or high flow your stock turbo.

NO offense, but your turbo is a bitsa, front is capable of over 360rwkw, with a tiny exhaust housing that is probably worse than the .63 garrett. Im surprised hypergear suggested such a setup

He never suggested i re use my exhaust housing, i asked for it because its already modified to fit external wastegate setup so it was less fabrication 2 be done.

The wastegate is a 50mm purple looking one from otomoto.com.au runs 1bar spring, ive actually got the top pre load screw wound all the way in to hold 1.3 bar boost

there is also 1 more vacum fitting on top of the wastegate near the pre load screw not 2 sure wot it does?

do u think i would gain anything by buying a .63 garrett exhaust housing? is 400rwhp at 18psi still achievable?

or would .82 be more the go?

not interested in gt30 series ive been in a r33 with gt3082 and it didnt wow me at all.. had near 380rwhp and felt boring as...

as for highflow , i wouldnt want to waste my money, i been thru 2 highflows from slide yrs ago and they were just plain boring.

you use both vacuum fittings if your using an ebc.

have you gone for a drive with the vac line disconnected yet? no point looking at different housings until you sort your boost issues out

not yet its been raining and storming all day :D

i will tommorrow though

He never suggested i re use my exhaust housing, i asked for it because its already modified to fit external wastegate setup so it was less fabrication 2 be done.

The wastegate is a 50mm purple looking one from otomoto.com.au runs 1bar spring, ive actually got the top pre load screw wound all the way in to hold 1.3 bar boost

there is also 1 more vacum fitting on top of the wastegate near the pre load screw not 2 sure wot it does?

do u think i would gain anything by buying a .63 garrett exhaust housing? is 400rwhp at 18psi still achievable?

or would .82 be more the go?

not interested in gt30 series ive been in a r33 with gt3082 and it didnt wow me at all.. had near 380rwhp and felt boring as...

as for highflow , i wouldnt want to waste my money, i been thru 2 highflows from slide yrs ago and they were just plain boring.

probaby because a GT3082 is a totally rubbish mis-matched turbo and to make things worse, if that's all the power it made, it's probably .63 which makes the mis-match of compressor and turbine way worse again. If u get in a car with a RB25 and a GT3076R .82 and a really good tune and it WILL wow you!

You need to remember that the R in an A/R is effectively the radius of the exhaust turbine, so when your exhaust housing was opened up for the 3582 wheel, it decreased the A/R, possibly to .5

No amount of overboring a housing to accept larger turbine rotor will impact on the A/R.

A = cross sectional area of the scroll

R = radius from the shaft axis to centroid of the scroll at the point of measuring the cross sectional area.

Basically A/R is fixed.

I'd suggest a call to Hypergear and consult with Stao.

Dale i have had a few talks with him and he suggests exh cam gear but my tuner says it prob wont gain much if anything at all.

bradsm87

yes ur are correct its .63 and its so boring and linear power sorta just revs from 3500 onwards speedo moves but u get no kick what so ever

bradsm87

yes ur are correct its .63 and its so boring and linear power sorta just revs from 3500 onwards speedo moves but u get no kick what so ever

DON'T use a GT3082R .63 as an example of ALL GT30 turbos.

I think your best bet is to chuck on a GT3076R .82 and U won't be disappointed. They're good for about 330rwkw (440hp) with stock cams and about 360rwkw (480hp) with some drop-in 260 tomei cams or similar. Should hit boost hard at 3500 and just HAUL to redline.

I just read your first post. I hope that's 400 kilowatts at the wheels and not horsepower. If it's horsepower, you can make MORE than that with 3076. I'm guessing it's horsepower because there's no way a walbro in-tank could supply enough fuel for 400rwkw.

Edited by bradsm87
DON'T use a GT3082R .63 as an example of ALL GT30 turbos.

I think your best bet is to chuck on a GT3076R .82 and U won't be disappointed. They're good for about 330rwkw (440hp) with stock cams and about 360rwkw (480hp) with some drop-in 260 tomei cams or similar. Should hit boost hard at 3500 and just HAUL to redline.

I just read your first post. I hope that's 400 kilowatts at the wheels and not horsepower. If it's horsepower, you can make MORE than that with 3076. I'm guessing it's horsepower because there's no way a walbro in-tank could supply enough fuel for 400rwkw.

My GT3082R on my RB25 was a brilliant turbo... relatively responsive and went hard.

Jesus some of you guys inflate power outputs and what people should expect from their car. Jump on the RB25 results thread, you dont see too many people with bolt on mods cracking 400rwhp (genuine). Its not that easy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...