Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i need some advice on my setup currently

here are the mods

completey stock rb25 motor

hypergear GT3582 turbo anti surged slotted

50mm external wastegate

740cc injectors

Link G1 ecu

walbro intank pump

stock fuel regulator

splitfire coilpacks

now with the turbo exhaust side i re used my kkr .69 housing which has been modified to suit 50mm gate off it.

I got the car tuned 2 weeks ago and made 400atw on 1.3 bar boost

The dumpipe currently on the car is a 2.75" vband cast iron thing u get from otomoto which then connects to 3" front pipe thru to gutted cat and 3" xforce canon

What i wanna know is basically the car is very laggy, im not seeing 1.3 bar boost until 5000-5500rpm, even between gear changes it will lagg if i dont slam gears to build boost back up.

Could i do something to bring this on harder/sooner? bigger dumpipe? adjustable exh cam gear?

any advice would be great thanks guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/307181-need-some-advice/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

haha cant flatshift man syncros are on there way out to 8 test n tunes will do that :laugh:

nismoid, that i mite try, u mean just take off the vacum line and see how fast it builds boost hmmm i think link is set 21psi boost cut so should be fine

i think he is referring to the map based ecu cutting ignition @ anything over 21psi. so as long as it is tuned with enough tolerance for that much boost it should be o.

Does your wastegate have any preload adjustment? mine with no extra preload would quickly ramp to 15psi and then slowly edge its way to ~19psi @ 5500-6000. wind some preload into the gate and boost ramps up to 19 around 3500

Edited by TiTAN

Which kkr turbo was the housing off? FWIW i made 327rwkw on a 3582 .63 @ 18psi on a stock 26, but for the power i felt it was slow to make boost/had a high boost threashold, but was not laggy between gearchanges.

Edited by Adriano

From KKR's website it says its a .69 Turbine. But who knows. Still, 400rwhp on a fully stock Rb25 at 18psi is not bad.

The size of the turbo is just too big for fast response. Sale that and get them to make you a GT3071 equivalent or high flow your stock turbo.

  Adriano said:
NO offense, but your turbo is a bitsa, front is capable of over 360rwkw, with a tiny exhaust housing that is probably worse than the .63 garrett. Im surprised hypergear suggested such a setup

He never suggested i re use my exhaust housing, i asked for it because its already modified to fit external wastegate setup so it was less fabrication 2 be done.

The wastegate is a 50mm purple looking one from otomoto.com.au runs 1bar spring, ive actually got the top pre load screw wound all the way in to hold 1.3 bar boost

there is also 1 more vacum fitting on top of the wastegate near the pre load screw not 2 sure wot it does?

do u think i would gain anything by buying a .63 garrett exhaust housing? is 400rwhp at 18psi still achievable?

or would .82 be more the go?

not interested in gt30 series ive been in a r33 with gt3082 and it didnt wow me at all.. had near 380rwhp and felt boring as...

as for highflow , i wouldnt want to waste my money, i been thru 2 highflows from slide yrs ago and they were just plain boring.

  JonnoHR31 said:
you use both vacuum fittings if your using an ebc.

have you gone for a drive with the vac line disconnected yet? no point looking at different housings until you sort your boost issues out

not yet its been raining and storming all day :D

i will tommorrow though

  l0WRB said:
He never suggested i re use my exhaust housing, i asked for it because its already modified to fit external wastegate setup so it was less fabrication 2 be done.

The wastegate is a 50mm purple looking one from otomoto.com.au runs 1bar spring, ive actually got the top pre load screw wound all the way in to hold 1.3 bar boost

there is also 1 more vacum fitting on top of the wastegate near the pre load screw not 2 sure wot it does?

do u think i would gain anything by buying a .63 garrett exhaust housing? is 400rwhp at 18psi still achievable?

or would .82 be more the go?

not interested in gt30 series ive been in a r33 with gt3082 and it didnt wow me at all.. had near 380rwhp and felt boring as...

as for highflow , i wouldnt want to waste my money, i been thru 2 highflows from slide yrs ago and they were just plain boring.

probaby because a GT3082 is a totally rubbish mis-matched turbo and to make things worse, if that's all the power it made, it's probably .63 which makes the mis-match of compressor and turbine way worse again. If u get in a car with a RB25 and a GT3076R .82 and a really good tune and it WILL wow you!

  Adriano said:
You need to remember that the R in an A/R is effectively the radius of the exhaust turbine, so when your exhaust housing was opened up for the 3582 wheel, it decreased the A/R, possibly to .5

No amount of overboring a housing to accept larger turbine rotor will impact on the A/R.

A = cross sectional area of the scroll

R = radius from the shaft axis to centroid of the scroll at the point of measuring the cross sectional area.

Basically A/R is fixed.

I'd suggest a call to Hypergear and consult with Stao.

Dale i have had a few talks with him and he suggests exh cam gear but my tuner says it prob wont gain much if anything at all.

bradsm87

yes ur are correct its .63 and its so boring and linear power sorta just revs from 3500 onwards speedo moves but u get no kick what so ever

  l0WRB said:
bradsm87

yes ur are correct its .63 and its so boring and linear power sorta just revs from 3500 onwards speedo moves but u get no kick what so ever

DON'T use a GT3082R .63 as an example of ALL GT30 turbos.

I think your best bet is to chuck on a GT3076R .82 and U won't be disappointed. They're good for about 330rwkw (440hp) with stock cams and about 360rwkw (480hp) with some drop-in 260 tomei cams or similar. Should hit boost hard at 3500 and just HAUL to redline.

I just read your first post. I hope that's 400 kilowatts at the wheels and not horsepower. If it's horsepower, you can make MORE than that with 3076. I'm guessing it's horsepower because there's no way a walbro in-tank could supply enough fuel for 400rwkw.

Edited by bradsm87
  bradsm87 said:
DON'T use a GT3082R .63 as an example of ALL GT30 turbos.

I think your best bet is to chuck on a GT3076R .82 and U won't be disappointed. They're good for about 330rwkw (440hp) with stock cams and about 360rwkw (480hp) with some drop-in 260 tomei cams or similar. Should hit boost hard at 3500 and just HAUL to redline.

I just read your first post. I hope that's 400 kilowatts at the wheels and not horsepower. If it's horsepower, you can make MORE than that with 3076. I'm guessing it's horsepower because there's no way a walbro in-tank could supply enough fuel for 400rwkw.

My GT3082R on my RB25 was a brilliant turbo... relatively responsive and went hard.

Jesus some of you guys inflate power outputs and what people should expect from their car. Jump on the RB25 results thread, you dont see too many people with bolt on mods cracking 400rwhp (genuine). Its not that easy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 馃槩 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
  • Create New...