Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Stock, the Nissan turbo regulator applies a 1:1 change in fuel pressure along with manifold pressure.

Fuel pressure is negated by boost so the net effect is 43psi of fuel pressure regardless of boost/vac.

Some example figures (sorry about underscores):

base___manifold__fuel____net fuel___when

43psi__-7psi_____36psi___43psi_____idle (i.e. manifold vacuum)

43psi___0psi_____43psi___43psi_____no boost, no vac

43psi___20psi____63psi___43psi_____20psi boost

A rising-rate regulator does a different thing - changes fuel pressure by some multiplier other than 1 along with boost; both the rate and the threshold "it starts working at" may be adjustable.

Corky Bell claims to have brought the "original" rising-rate regulator to the market according to Corky's comments on FPR

Some of his regulators are designed to workalongside the existing regulator, some replace it completely.

For example, the rate might be set to 2:1 and the threshold, 0psi of boost. Then we have some example figures:

base___manifold__fuel____net fuel___when

43psi___-7psi____36psi___43psi____ idle (manifold vac, no regulator action)

43psi____0psi____43psi___43psi____no boost, no regulator action

43psi____1psi____45psi___44psi____1psi boost, +2psi fuel pressure, +1psi net extra fuel pressure

43psi____20psi___83psi___63psi____20psi boost, +40psi fuel pressure, +20psi extra fuel pressure

Cheers,

Saliya

Forget about manifold pressure, i'm referring to the actual pressure that you'll see with a gauge inline. Max fuel pressure is approx 40psi or so, the pumps don't pump it any harder than that I thought, maybe I need to read up on rising rate regs, even with the return line clamped you'll see 40 psi max so how can extra pressure be available (someone explain) ??? All that little vacuum line does for a FPR is lift a valve of its seat no extra pressure is pumped into the system its just a sealed diaphragm.

Mate I think you should go have a read on how fuel systems work before you hand out advice. 80% duty cycle is preferred and its well documented why, fuel pressure regs do increase/decrease fuel pressure depending on the vacuum/boost in the manifold.

Yeah because as soon as you hit 81% duty cycle your engine automatically explodes!!!! :) Do you even know what duty cycle is? You need to put away your fast fours mag and get your hands dirty, my r33 gts-t ran 96% duty cycle for over a year without a problem you going to tell me i'm wrong? And for the record when the FPR has vacuum applied to it the line pressure will be around (from memory) 25-30 psi because the diaphragm lifts the seat and allows fuel back to the tank via a return line so even though the pump is at 40psi the line pressure is much lower than that. Under WOT or boost conditions the FPR is closed bringing line pressure up to 40psi the boost you run on top of that does not change that figure. The boost you run doesn't increase the pressure in the line it just closes it off to lift pressure.

Forget about manifold pressure, i'm referring to the actual pressure that you'll see with a gauge inline. Max fuel pressure is approx 40psi or so, the pumps don't pump it any harder than that I thought, maybe I need to read up on rising rate regs, even with the return line clamped you'll see 40 psi max so how can extra pressure be available (someone explain) ??? All that little vacuum line does for a FPR is lift a valve of its seat no extra pressure is pumped into the system its just a sealed diaphragm.

Yeah because as soon as you hit 81% duty cycle your engine automatically explodes!!!! :) Do you even know what duty cycle is? You need to put away your fast fours mag and get your hands dirty, my r33 gts-t ran 96% duty cycle for over a year without a problem you going to tell me i'm wrong? And for the record when the FPR has vacuum applied to it the line pressure will be around (from memory) 25-30 psi because the diaphragm lifts the seat and allows fuel back to the tank via a return line so even though the pump is at 40psi the line pressure is much lower than that. Under WOT or boost conditions the FPR is closed bringing line pressure up to 40psi the boost you run on top of that does not change that figure. The boost you run doesn't increase the pressure in the line it just closes it off to lift pressure.

wrong, wrong and wrong

as adriano said, clamp the line and fuel pressure will go off the end of a normal gauge with any properly working efi pump. its been said enough times, fuel pressure is referenced to manifold pressure. the reg constantly keeps fuel pressure 43psi above manifold pressure.

if your so certain your reg holds 40psi under boost then try taking the vac line off. if your right it'll be perfectly fine....

Edited by JonnoHR31
Forget about manifold pressure, i'm referring to the actual pressure that you'll see with a gauge inline. Max fuel pressure is approx 40psi or so, the pumps don't pump it any harder than that I thought, maybe I need to read up on rising rate regs, even with the return line clamped you'll see 40 psi max so how can extra pressure be available (someone explain) ??? All that little vacuum line does for a FPR is lift a valve of its seat no extra pressure is pumped into the system its just a sealed diaphragm.

Hi,

This _is_ the actual pressure that you'll see with a gauge inline. Those figures for a stock regulator GTR were read straight off the fuel and boost gauges either side of my wheel.

Yeah because as soon as you hit 81% duty cycle your engine automatically explodes!!!! :) Do you even know what duty cycle is? You need to put away your fast fours mag and get your hands dirty, my r33 gts-t ran 96% duty cycle for over a year without a problem you going to tell me i'm wrong? And for the record when the FPR has vacuum applied to it the line pressure will be around (from memory) 25-30 psi because the diaphragm lifts the seat and allows fuel back to the tank via a return line

I personally don't see a problem with running injectors up to 99.99% provided _all_ mapping points are mapped and the injector manufacturer says it's OK to do so.

However, since it's virtually-impossible to map all load points and correction factors during a tune (e.g. inlet air temp) most people like to leave "some room" for when these things change.

so even though the pump is at 40psi the line pressure is much lower than that. Under WOT or boost conditions the FPR is closed bringing line pressure up to 40psi the boost you run on top of that does not change that figure. The boost you run doesn't increase the pressure in the line it just closes it off to lift pressure.

I get the feeling you don't believe me - put a gauge on your own car, take some measurements, and you'll learn something new. I wouldn't advise popping the vac line off your reg unless you like boost-induced leanouts.

Cheers,

Saliya

Forget about manifold pressure, i'm referring to the actual pressure that you'll see with a gauge inline. Max fuel pressure is approx 40psi or so, the pumps don't pump it any harder than that I thought, maybe I need to read up on rising rate regs, even with the return line clamped you'll see 40 psi max so how can extra pressure be available (someone explain) ??? All that little vacuum line does for a FPR is lift a valve of its seat no extra pressure is pumped into the system its just a sealed diaphragm.

Yeah because as soon as you hit 81% duty cycle your engine automatically explodes!!!! :) Do you even know what duty cycle is? You need to put away your fast fours mag and get your hands dirty, my r33 gts-t ran 96% duty cycle for over a year without a problem you going to tell me i'm wrong? And for the record when the FPR has vacuum applied to it the line pressure will be around (from memory) 25-30 psi because the diaphragm lifts the seat and allows fuel back to the tank via a return line so even though the pump is at 40psi the line pressure is much lower than that. Under WOT or boost conditions the FPR is closed bringing line pressure up to 40psi the boost you run on top of that does not change that figure. The boost you run doesn't increase the pressure in the line it just closes it off to lift pressure.

Go do some reading boosted EFI FPR setups... :(

I personally don't see a problem with running injectors up to 99.99% provided _all_ mapping points are mapped and the injector manufacturer says it's OK to do so.

However, since it's virtually-impossible to map all load points and correction factors during a tune (e.g. inlet air temp) most people like to leave "some room" for when these things change.

The problem is above around 90-95% the injector will be static and completely open anyway. Sure it'll be getting a 0.9 pulse to the injector, but the injector is mechanical and physically can't open and close in the time of the off pulse so anything around 90-95% technically is maxing it out. Depending on the injector you might get some more flow at 100% but it wont be a linear increase, it will drop drop off severely around 90%.

Here is an image to demonstrate what you are likely to see.

93822076.png

So as most people have said, you should always aim for not much more than 80% duty cycle.

Edited by Rolls
wrong, wrong and wrong

as adriano said, clamp the line and fuel pressure will go off the end of a normal gauge with any properly working efi pump. its been said enough times, fuel pressure is referenced to manifold pressure. the reg constantly keeps fuel pressure 43psi above manifold pressure.

if your so certain your reg holds 40psi under boost then try taking the vac line off. if your right it'll be perfectly fine....

I get what you're saying in reference to constant 43psi in relation to manifold, just never seen any factory efi pump get that high( i've looked at quite a few). Obviously i'm wrong, guess you learn something new every day.

Cheers.

P.S for the record I did mention that I might need to be some research in an earlier post, just thought I know how it worked, i didn't, now i do. I'm always open to new info even if I am a stubborn so and so.

The problem is above around 90-95% the injector will be static and completely open anyway. Sure it'll be getting a 0.9 pulse to the injector, but the injector is mechanical and physically can't open and close in the time of the off pulse so anything around 90-95% technically is maxing it out. Depending on the injector you might get some more flow at 100% but it wont be a linear increase, it will drop drop off severely around 90%.

Hey,

Cheers for the data, but if you're mapped for the load/RPM and you have the right AFRs, it doesn't _really_ matter whether the injector is open for 100%, 90%, or 20% - it's still correctly-mapped.

I would assume that if this is a common property to all injectors, the ECU's corrections for "slightly-off-map" points would account for it where extrapolation is required.

As an aside: that graph looks like simple PWM input vs flow output (the ECU's correction for lag time may not be included).

So I still think the idea of "allowing 20%" is antiquated :thumbsup: Maybe someone that does this for a living could step in and provide some real-world data?

I know only what I've seen on my own car(s).

Cheers,

Saliya

Hey,

Cheers for the data, but if you're mapped for the load/RPM and you have the right AFRs, it doesn't _really_ matter whether the injector is open for 100%, 90%, or 20% - it's still correctly-mapped.

I would assume that if this is a common property to all injectors, the ECU's corrections for "slightly-off-map" points would account for it where extrapolation is required.

As an aside: that graph looks like simple PWM input vs flow output (the ECU's correction for lag time may not be included).

So I still think the idea of "allowing 20%" is antiquated :thumbsup: Maybe someone that does this for a living could step in and provide some real-world data?

I know only what I've seen on my own car(s).

Cheers,

Saliya

The 80% is not a hard and fast rule. Its just a guide when you are sizing injectors. That way it gives you a bit of room if you underestimate your requirements.

Cheers for the data, but if you're mapped for the load/RPM and you have the right AFRs, it doesn't _really_ matter whether the injector is open for 100%, 90%, or 20% - it's still correctly-mapped.

Yes this is completely true, sorry my point was more that people should realise that above 90-95% they aren't going to get more fuel. The reason I say this is if say you mapped everything at 90% and it is running fine you might go to yourself "Oh I still have 10% to play with so if we get an extra cold day it will be fine" However as seen from the graph it is a false sense of security, you should be treating 90% as the absolute maximum.

As an aside: that graph looks like simple PWM input vs flow output (the ECU's correction for lag time may not be included).

Yes that is all it is, a very simplistic estimated flow vs PWM output. If you know the open and close time for the injector along with the frequency of the PWM signal I could generate an accurate graph for you.

Personally I think the allow 10-20% is a good rule, whilst you may have tuned your car so that it correctly mapped, you still are guessing for changes in boost and air temp. What if you tuned the car in 10c weather and maxed out the injectors? (lets say a very cold day) and then you go out for a drive in the rain in the hills where the air temp is say 4c and the rain on the intercooler causes it to work far more efficiently? You are almost certainly going to need that 10% of headroom.

Edited by Rolls

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Back again. I returned to Japan in Jul/Aug to spend time with the car on my birthday and remind myself what all the sacrifice and compromise is for. It happened to line up with the monthly morning meet in Okutama, which I have been wanting to go to for a long time. It's a unique event at a unique spot with really rare, interesting, and quirky cars. It's where all the oldheads and OGs gather. The nighttime scene at DKF certainly has its place and should be experienced if you're into cars, but there's too much bad attention and negativity around it now. IMO the better time is Sunday morning at DKF or Okutama; it's more chill and relaxed. I'm glad I was finally able to go, but not sure it's worth the drive from all the way from Nagoya immediately the day before, unless I was already staying in Tokyo for the days right before the meet, because you have to wake up quite early to make it in time. Funnily enough though I didn't drive the car all that much this trip because it was just too damn hot. While there were zero issues and running temps were nominal and the A/C was strong, RBs already run crazy hot as it is. Sure, it took it all like a champ but something about driving these cars in the ridiculous heat/humidity bothers me and makes me feel like I'm asking too much of it. I'm just me being weird and treating the car like a living thing with feelings; I'm mechanically sympathetic to a fault. Instead I was mainly driving something else around - a KX4(silver) 2001 X-Trail GT, that I acquired in May. There's a few different flavors to choose from with Xs, but visually it's the Nissan version of the Honda CR-V. Mechanically it's a whole different story as this, being the top-trim GT, has an SR20VET mated to a four-speed auto and full-time AWD! It was a very affordable buy in exceptional condition inside and out, with very low mileage...only 48k kms. Most likely it was owned by an older person who kept it garaged and well-maintained, so I'm really happy with how it all worked out. It literally needs zero attention at the moment, albeit except for some minor visual touch-ups. I wanted something quirky, interesting, and practical and for sure it handily delivers on all three of those aspects. I was immediately able to utilize the cargo and passenger capacity to its full extent. It's a lot of fun to drive and is quite punchy through 1st and 2nd. It's very unassuming -in the twisty bits it's a lot more composed than one would think at a glance- and it'll be even better once I get better tires on it(yes, it's an SUV but still a little boat-y for my liking). So...now I have two golden-era Nissans in silver. One sports car and one that does everything else; the perfect two-car solution I think👍 The rest of the trip...I was able to turn my stressed brain off and enjoy it, although I didn't quite get to do as much as I thought. I did some interesting things, met some interesting people, and happened into some interesting situations however, that's all for another post though only if people really want to know. Project-wise, I went back to Mine's again to discuss more plans and am hoping to wrap that up real soon; keep watching this space if that interests you. Additionally, while working in the tormenting sweatbox that is the warehouse, I was able to organize most of the myriad of parts that my friend is storing for me along with the cars, and the 34 has a nice little spot carved out for it: And since it can get so stupid hot in there, that made it all the more easy -after I was standing there looking at the car and said 'f**k it'- to finally remove all the damn gauges that have mostly been an eyesore all this time. Huzzah. The heat basically makes the adhesive backing on the gauge mounts more pliable to work with, so it was far less stressful getting this done. I didn't fully clean it up or chase the wiring though; that will happen once I have the car in closer possession. Another major reason to remove all that stuff is to give people less reasons to get in my car and steal s**t while it's being exported/imported when/if the time comes, which leads us to my next point... ...and that is even though it's time in Japan is technically almost up since it's a November car and the X would be coming in March, I'm still not entirely sure where my life and career is headed; I don't really know what the future looks like and where I'm going to end up. I feel there's a great deal of uncertainty with me and as a result of that, it feels like I'm at a crossroads moreso now than any point in my life thus far and there are some choices I need to make. Yes, I've had some years to consider things and prepare myself, however too much has happened in that time to maintain confidence and everything feels so up in the air; tenuous one might say. Simply put, there's just too much nonsense going on right now from multiple vectors. Admittedly, I'm struggling to stay in the game and keep my eyes on the prize. So much so in fact, that very recently I came the closest I ever have before to calling it quits outright; selling everything and moving on and not looking back. The astute among you will pick up on key subtext within this paragraph. In the meantime I've still managed to slowly acquire some final bits for the car, but it feels nice knowing there's not much left to get and I'm almost across that finish line; I have almost everything I'll ever want for my interpretation and expression on what it is I think an R34 should be. 'til later.
    • Thanks for that, hadn’t used my brain enough to think about that. 
    • Also playing with fire if they start to flow more air down low than what the stock twins can. It's not even up top you need to worry, it can be at 3000rpm and part throttle and it's getting way more flow than it should.
    • Any G40/1000 or G40/1250 results out there?  
    • You still want a proper tune on the stock ECU though. Stock tune + stock ECU with GT-SS/-9s is probably playing with fire if you're running more than stock airflow/power.
×
×
  • Create New...