Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Willall Racing just ran a 1 min 12.19 at Mallala today in their JDM R35 GTR.

Faster than the group A R32 GTR!

Congratulations Keir & Martin. You guys are flying now.

E85 looks like the way to go, when are you going to fit the bigger turbos?

Wish I was there................. oh well. I will keep working.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/307957-r35-faster-than-group-a-r32-gtr/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

congrats, its great that a relatively standard 35 gtr tweaked by a few cluey guys in the city of churches has outdone a 21 year old R32 with extensive race history funded by a rich tobacco company with part factory backing run by one of the best in the business :)

:laugh:

Today was one of those fruitful testing sessions where the track is 'in the slot' versus other times recently when we have been there where the drifters have convered the corners is dirt, or the supertrucks had laid diesel everywhere. No excuses today, it was a good solid fast track condition day and with plenty of time we were able to run some good data on the car and start to dial in the suspension and wing settings. Best part though is that after a couple of months working on our EVO programme I was able to get back in the chair of the GTR and have a feel of the setup....I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity of 'de-greening' the slicks in the morning session, which is kind of like trying to drive a 9 second drag car on ice.

The biggest problem the GTR faces in its current guise is that it is traction limited. Believe it or not, even with a set of new Michelin medium compound slicks on board and properly bedded in controlling wheelspin through the esses and out of turns three and five is a real problem, and one that can panic the four wheel drive electronics if not managed correctly. You really need to feed the throttle to stop the fronts and rears lighting up and pushing the car into a big sideways moment. I found this out early on in the piece when the tyres were still green. The pure raw straighline speed of the car is unnerving as it builds speed so quickly, and is stretching well into fifth gear at the braking points, as is keeping the throttle into it through the kink and the long left hander out of the nothern hairpin. Its a difficult balancing act, and one I wasnt prepared to push the limits of after the break, so 14s over the three laps I did was acceptable. The whole time you need to keep the thought that this is a 700hp+ road car chassis in the back of your head and drive accordingly. It would be interesting to take one of the 'these cars drive themselves' crew for a passenger lap for the sport of it one day. My only suggestion would be to bring an adult diaper or be prepared to pay a cleaning fee :(

'Power down' engine management settings (TPS controlled boost mapping) for corner exit speed and then adjusting the relationship between bump/rebound and tyre pressure for the varying track temperatures over the day gave us the pace increase, no magic here, just a methodical work structure of test and tune. Sensibly on fresh tyres there is no reason why we shouldnt be able to record consistent 1:10 laps in this car. That might sound a little far fetched now, but 6 months ago the idea of a 1:12 in a road car would have been bordering on unbelievable, particularly as this is a stock engine, stock turbo, stock transmission car. Some well thought out modifications, a set of slick tyres and ongoing testing and development are the keys to this cars pace :(

We have some way to go still to beat the Winfield cars by the looks of it, Skaife had it on pole there in 1991 with a 1.09 or similar. One must always have targets! However we are only 3 tenths of the outright Carerra Cup lap record to put the whole thing in perspective :nyaanyaa:

Edited by Martin Donnon

+1 on the brake water spray progress..

And not to cast aspersions on you and Keir's driving skills Martin, but you have to remember it was "Thee Mark Skaife" driving that R32. We need to compare apples with apples here. What additional time would him or some other professional driver well on his game be able to extract out of your R35?

Edited by fungoolie

Interestingly enough the brake cooling system raised its head in anger when I had overlooked part of my job. Essentially I didnt mark off the bottle was filled between sessions, and sure enough there was enough water surge away from the pickup of the pump to ensure that before the low level warning was on (there was still over a litre in the tank) that the car was off an into the dirt with the brake pedal on the floor. At this pace we have four laps of full stint running before we have to refill the stock washer bottle, or risk boiling the brake fluid. To give you an idea of the temperature difference we now have a cooling system in the pits for the front brakes and the frontal cooling system of the car, when it came in with no water left in the tank the left hand side front pads caught alight, and thats after two cool down laps! :)

Sure enough though we have done some math on the car today and have worked around what I believe is some sensible SA engineering thats still roadable to get this car comfortably into the 1:10 zone at the track :domokun:

give me a drive, 3rd lap I promise you a 1.09 :)

or at least die trying !!

nice work, great read.

currently home-prepping my rb26 track car ready for its 1st rundown on 12/4/01 at the sau:sa track day

Martin

what are you max lateral g's now, vs say prior ro the slicks and/or wing? Might be handy to put a scale on the right hand of the chart

Or even post your G force polar plot please.

I didnt get around to a full G-plot today (forgot actually!)

What I can tell you though Fungoolie is that in the Esses we are seeing around 1.35-1.4 lateral G loading,

and the big one -1.2G at 202km/h on the face of the kink. Thats why it feels a little scary :down:

I didnt get around to a full G-plot today (forgot actually!)

What I can tell you though Fungoolie is that in the Esses we are seeing around 1.35-1.4 lateral G loading,

and the big one -1.2G at 202km/h on the face of the kink. Thats why it feels a little scary :P

Cogs of steel guys! 1.2G in the kink? Glad you had slicks on! :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...